Cargando…
Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders
There is a long-standing failure to create an ethical culture around substance use disorders (SUDs) or dependence that actively supports people’s recovery efforts. Issues which impede the development of prorecovery environments are complex, but include the far-reaching effects of the social stigma t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106661 |
_version_ | 1784609233300357120 |
---|---|
author | Williamson, Laura |
author_facet | Williamson, Laura |
author_sort | Williamson, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a long-standing failure to create an ethical culture around substance use disorders (SUDs) or dependence that actively supports people’s recovery efforts. Issues which impede the development of prorecovery environments are complex, but include the far-reaching effects of the social stigma that surrounds SUDs; and the failure to harness relational and social support that allows debates to transcend blaming individual substance users. As part of efforts to create prorecovery environments, it is important to acknowledge that bioethics debate on SUDs is narrow in scope, prioritising topics related to its traditional interests in individual autonomy and novel technologies. As a result, it has not played a significant role in helping to transform the ethical cultures in which substance use recovery takes place. For example, it largely neglects the ethical challenges of developing an empathic, person-centred approach to substance use problems that listens and responds to the voices of clients. It has also participated little in efforts to develop a positive response to reducing the toxic effects of stigma. Indeed, some contributions from the field fan stigma, rather than alleviate it. The aim of this paper is to seed broader ethical debate, in academic literature and lay/professional communities, on how societies should respond to SUDs: steering a course between the critical, but narrow approach of bioethics and the empowerment discourse of evidence-based treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8639939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86399392021-12-15 Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders Williamson, Laura J Med Ethics Original Research There is a long-standing failure to create an ethical culture around substance use disorders (SUDs) or dependence that actively supports people’s recovery efforts. Issues which impede the development of prorecovery environments are complex, but include the far-reaching effects of the social stigma that surrounds SUDs; and the failure to harness relational and social support that allows debates to transcend blaming individual substance users. As part of efforts to create prorecovery environments, it is important to acknowledge that bioethics debate on SUDs is narrow in scope, prioritising topics related to its traditional interests in individual autonomy and novel technologies. As a result, it has not played a significant role in helping to transform the ethical cultures in which substance use recovery takes place. For example, it largely neglects the ethical challenges of developing an empathic, person-centred approach to substance use problems that listens and responds to the voices of clients. It has also participated little in efforts to develop a positive response to reducing the toxic effects of stigma. Indeed, some contributions from the field fan stigma, rather than alleviate it. The aim of this paper is to seed broader ethical debate, in academic literature and lay/professional communities, on how societies should respond to SUDs: steering a course between the critical, but narrow approach of bioethics and the empowerment discourse of evidence-based treatments. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8639939/ /pubmed/33177147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106661 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Williamson, Laura Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
title | Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
title_full | Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
title_fullStr | Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
title_short | Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
title_sort | creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsonlaura creatinganethicalculturetosupportrecoveryfromsubstanceusedisorders |