Cargando…
Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
PURPOSE: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral si...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34855012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00419-x |
_version_ | 1784609245647339520 |
---|---|
author | Familiari, Filippo Hochreiter, Bettina Gerber, Christian |
author_facet | Familiari, Filippo Hochreiter, Bettina Gerber, Christian |
author_sort | Familiari, Filippo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral side. METHODS: Between April 2011 to November 2013, 5 patients (3 men, 2 women, mean age 46.4, range 35-57) with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint, were treated with a humeral head replacement combined with replacement of the glenoid surface with an osteochondral, glenoid allograft. RESULTS: Overall, clinically, there was one excellent, one satisfactory and three poor results. Mean preoperative subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 34% (range: 20-50%) and preoperative relative Constant-Murley-Score (CSr) was 43 points (range: 29-64 points). Three patients with poor results had to be revised within the first three years. Their mean pre-revision SSV and CSr were 38% (range: 15-80%) and 36 points (range: 7-59 points) respectively. One patient was revised 9 years after the primary procedure with advanced glenoid erosion and pain and one patient has an ongoing satisfactory outcome without revision. Their SSVs were 60% and 83%, their CSr were 65 points and 91 points, 9 and 10 years after the primary procedure, respectively. Mean follow-up was 7 years (2-10 years) and mean time to revision was 4 years (range: 1-9 years). CONCLUSION: The in-vivo pilot study of a previously established in-vitro technique of osteochondral glenoid allograft combined with humeral HA led to three early failures and only one really satisfactory clinical outcome which, however, was associated with advanced glenoid erosion. Osteochondral allograft glenoid resurfacing was associated with an unacceptable early failure rate and no results superior to those widely documented for HA or TSA, so that the procedure has been abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8640012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86400122021-12-15 Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid Familiari, Filippo Hochreiter, Bettina Gerber, Christian J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral side. METHODS: Between April 2011 to November 2013, 5 patients (3 men, 2 women, mean age 46.4, range 35-57) with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint, were treated with a humeral head replacement combined with replacement of the glenoid surface with an osteochondral, glenoid allograft. RESULTS: Overall, clinically, there was one excellent, one satisfactory and three poor results. Mean preoperative subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 34% (range: 20-50%) and preoperative relative Constant-Murley-Score (CSr) was 43 points (range: 29-64 points). Three patients with poor results had to be revised within the first three years. Their mean pre-revision SSV and CSr were 38% (range: 15-80%) and 36 points (range: 7-59 points) respectively. One patient was revised 9 years after the primary procedure with advanced glenoid erosion and pain and one patient has an ongoing satisfactory outcome without revision. Their SSVs were 60% and 83%, their CSr were 65 points and 91 points, 9 and 10 years after the primary procedure, respectively. Mean follow-up was 7 years (2-10 years) and mean time to revision was 4 years (range: 1-9 years). CONCLUSION: The in-vivo pilot study of a previously established in-vitro technique of osteochondral glenoid allograft combined with humeral HA led to three early failures and only one really satisfactory clinical outcome which, however, was associated with advanced glenoid erosion. Osteochondral allograft glenoid resurfacing was associated with an unacceptable early failure rate and no results superior to those widely documented for HA or TSA, so that the procedure has been abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8640012/ /pubmed/34855012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00419-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Familiari, Filippo Hochreiter, Bettina Gerber, Christian Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
title | Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
title_full | Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
title_fullStr | Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
title_full_unstemmed | Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
title_short | Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
title_sort | unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34855012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00419-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT familiarifilippo unacceptablefailureofosteochondralglenoidallograftforbiologicresurfacingoftheglenoid AT hochreiterbettina unacceptablefailureofosteochondralglenoidallograftforbiologicresurfacingoftheglenoid AT gerberchristian unacceptablefailureofosteochondralglenoidallograftforbiologicresurfacingoftheglenoid |