Cargando…

Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid

PURPOSE: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Familiari, Filippo, Hochreiter, Bettina, Gerber, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34855012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00419-x
_version_ 1784609245647339520
author Familiari, Filippo
Hochreiter, Bettina
Gerber, Christian
author_facet Familiari, Filippo
Hochreiter, Bettina
Gerber, Christian
author_sort Familiari, Filippo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral side. METHODS: Between April 2011 to November 2013, 5 patients (3 men, 2 women, mean age 46.4, range 35-57) with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint, were treated with a humeral head replacement combined with replacement of the glenoid surface with an osteochondral, glenoid allograft. RESULTS: Overall, clinically, there was one excellent, one satisfactory and three poor results. Mean preoperative subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 34% (range: 20-50%) and preoperative relative Constant-Murley-Score (CSr) was 43 points (range: 29-64 points). Three patients with poor results had to be revised within the first three years. Their mean pre-revision SSV and CSr were 38% (range: 15-80%) and 36 points (range: 7-59 points) respectively. One patient was revised 9 years after the primary procedure with advanced glenoid erosion and pain and one patient has an ongoing satisfactory outcome without revision. Their SSVs were 60% and 83%, their CSr were 65 points and 91 points, 9 and 10 years after the primary procedure, respectively. Mean follow-up was 7 years (2-10 years) and mean time to revision was 4 years (range: 1-9 years). CONCLUSION: The in-vivo pilot study of a previously established in-vitro technique of osteochondral glenoid allograft combined with humeral HA led to three early failures and only one really satisfactory clinical outcome which, however, was associated with advanced glenoid erosion. Osteochondral allograft glenoid resurfacing was associated with an unacceptable early failure rate and no results superior to those widely documented for HA or TSA, so that the procedure has been abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8640012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86400122021-12-15 Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid Familiari, Filippo Hochreiter, Bettina Gerber, Christian J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral side. METHODS: Between April 2011 to November 2013, 5 patients (3 men, 2 women, mean age 46.4, range 35-57) with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint, were treated with a humeral head replacement combined with replacement of the glenoid surface with an osteochondral, glenoid allograft. RESULTS: Overall, clinically, there was one excellent, one satisfactory and three poor results. Mean preoperative subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 34% (range: 20-50%) and preoperative relative Constant-Murley-Score (CSr) was 43 points (range: 29-64 points). Three patients with poor results had to be revised within the first three years. Their mean pre-revision SSV and CSr were 38% (range: 15-80%) and 36 points (range: 7-59 points) respectively. One patient was revised 9 years after the primary procedure with advanced glenoid erosion and pain and one patient has an ongoing satisfactory outcome without revision. Their SSVs were 60% and 83%, their CSr were 65 points and 91 points, 9 and 10 years after the primary procedure, respectively. Mean follow-up was 7 years (2-10 years) and mean time to revision was 4 years (range: 1-9 years). CONCLUSION: The in-vivo pilot study of a previously established in-vitro technique of osteochondral glenoid allograft combined with humeral HA led to three early failures and only one really satisfactory clinical outcome which, however, was associated with advanced glenoid erosion. Osteochondral allograft glenoid resurfacing was associated with an unacceptable early failure rate and no results superior to those widely documented for HA or TSA, so that the procedure has been abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8640012/ /pubmed/34855012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00419-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Familiari, Filippo
Hochreiter, Bettina
Gerber, Christian
Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
title Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
title_full Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
title_fullStr Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
title_full_unstemmed Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
title_short Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
title_sort unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34855012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00419-x
work_keys_str_mv AT familiarifilippo unacceptablefailureofosteochondralglenoidallograftforbiologicresurfacingoftheglenoid
AT hochreiterbettina unacceptablefailureofosteochondralglenoidallograftforbiologicresurfacingoftheglenoid
AT gerberchristian unacceptablefailureofosteochondralglenoidallograftforbiologicresurfacingoftheglenoid