Cargando…

Validity of Categories Related to Gender Identity in ICD-11 and DSM-5 Among Transgender Individuals who Seek Gender-Affirming Medical Procedures

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The most recent versions of the two main mental disorders classifications—the World Health Organization's ICD-11 and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM–5—differ substantially in their diagnostic categories related to transgender identity. ICD-11 gender incongr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robles, Rebeca, Keeley, Jared W., Vega-Ramírez, Hamid, Cruz-Islas, Jeremy, Rodríguez-Pérez, Victor, Sharan, Pratap, Purnima, Shivani, Rao, Ravindra, Rodrigues-Lobato, María Inés, Soll, Bianca, Askevis-Leherpeux, Françoise, Roelandt, Jean-Luc, Campbell, Megan, Grobler, Gerhard, Stein, Dan J., Khoury, Brigitte, Khoury, Joseph El, Fresán, Ana, Medina-Mora, María-Elena, Reed, Geoffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100281
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The most recent versions of the two main mental disorders classifications—the World Health Organization's ICD-11 and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM–5—differ substantially in their diagnostic categories related to transgender identity. ICD-11 gender incongruence (GI), in contrast to DSM-5 gender dysphoria (GD), is explicitly not a mental disorder; neither distress nor dysfunction is a required feature. The objective was compared ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic requirements in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, discriminability and ability to predict the use of gender-affirming medical procedures. METHOD: A total of 649 of transgender adults in six countries completed a retrospective structured interview. RESULTS: Using ROC analysis, sensitivity of the diagnostic requirements was equivalent for both systems, but ICD-11 showed greater specificity than DSM-5. Regression analyses indicated that history of hormones and/or surgery was predicted by variables that are an intrinsic aspect of GI/GD more than by distress and dysfunction. IRT analyses showed that the ICD-11 diagnostic formulation was more parsimonious and contained more information about caseness than the DSM-5 model. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the ICD-11 position that GI/GD is not a mental disorder; additional diagnostic requirements of distress and/or dysfunction in DSM-5 reduce the predictive power of the diagnostic model.