Cargando…
Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
Background. Unrecognized visual deficits (VDs) following an acquired brain injury (ABI) may impact clients’ rehabilitation. Little is known about evaluation tools used in vision rehabilitation. Purpose. To systematically explore the literature describing evaluation tools used for VD on adults with A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174211042955 |
_version_ | 1784609307439923200 |
---|---|
author | Dubé, Camille Jin, Yu Powers, Brienne G. Li, Ginny Labelle, Amélie Rivers, Meghan S. Gumboc, Ivy M. Bussières, André E. |
author_facet | Dubé, Camille Jin, Yu Powers, Brienne G. Li, Ginny Labelle, Amélie Rivers, Meghan S. Gumboc, Ivy M. Bussières, André E. |
author_sort | Dubé, Camille |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Unrecognized visual deficits (VDs) following an acquired brain injury (ABI) may impact clients’ rehabilitation. Little is known about evaluation tools used in vision rehabilitation. Purpose. To systematically explore the literature describing evaluation tools used for VD on adults with ABI. Method. Using a scoping review methodology, we searched in MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the grey literature from inception to 2020. Quantitative and thematic analyses were performed. Findings. Of the 83 studies reporting on 86 evaluation tools, 47% used multiple tools to assess VD. Tools were mostly used by occupational therapists and psychologists to evaluate intermediate, intermediate to high, and high-level visual skills. Clinicians tend to select specific tools that focus on different levels of the hierarchy of visual skills. Implications. Future research should investigate the optimal timeframe for assessment of VD and the psychometric properties of tools to ensure comprehensive VD evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8640270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86402702021-12-04 Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review Dubé, Camille Jin, Yu Powers, Brienne G. Li, Ginny Labelle, Amélie Rivers, Meghan S. Gumboc, Ivy M. Bussières, André E. Can J Occup Ther Original Articles/Articles originaux Background. Unrecognized visual deficits (VDs) following an acquired brain injury (ABI) may impact clients’ rehabilitation. Little is known about evaluation tools used in vision rehabilitation. Purpose. To systematically explore the literature describing evaluation tools used for VD on adults with ABI. Method. Using a scoping review methodology, we searched in MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the grey literature from inception to 2020. Quantitative and thematic analyses were performed. Findings. Of the 83 studies reporting on 86 evaluation tools, 47% used multiple tools to assess VD. Tools were mostly used by occupational therapists and psychologists to evaluate intermediate, intermediate to high, and high-level visual skills. Clinicians tend to select specific tools that focus on different levels of the hierarchy of visual skills. Implications. Future research should investigate the optimal timeframe for assessment of VD and the psychometric properties of tools to ensure comprehensive VD evaluation. SAGE Publications 2021-10-18 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8640270/ /pubmed/34658251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174211042955 Text en © CAOT 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles/Articles originaux Dubé, Camille Jin, Yu Powers, Brienne G. Li, Ginny Labelle, Amélie Rivers, Meghan S. Gumboc, Ivy M. Bussières, André E. Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title | Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping
Review |
title_full | Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping
Review |
title_fullStr | Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping
Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping
Review |
title_short | Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping
Review |
title_sort | vision evaluation tools for adults with acquired brain injury: a scoping
review |
topic | Original Articles/Articles originaux |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174211042955 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dubecamille visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT jinyu visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT powersbrienneg visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT liginny visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT labelleamelie visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT riversmeghans visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT gumbocivym visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview AT bussieresandree visionevaluationtoolsforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryascopingreview |