Cargando…
Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliabil...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811 |
_version_ | 1784609309195239424 |
---|---|
author | Fowler, Floyd J. Sepucha, Karen R. Stringfellow, Vickie Valentine, KD |
author_facet | Fowler, Floyd J. Sepucha, Karen R. Stringfellow, Vickie Valentine, KD |
author_sort | Fowler, Floyd J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliability and validity of the measure to assess shared decision-making at clinical sites. Patients at sites using decision aids to promote shared decision-making for hip, knee, back, or breast cancer surgery had significantly higher scores than national cross-section samples of surgical patients for 3 of 4 comparisons and significantly higher scores for both comparisons with “usual care sites.” Reliability was supported by an intra-class correlation at the clinical site level of 0.93 and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56. The results document the reliability and validity of the measure to assess the degree of shared decision-making for surgical decisions at clinical sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8640277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86402772021-12-04 Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites Fowler, Floyd J. Sepucha, Karen R. Stringfellow, Vickie Valentine, KD J Patient Exp Research Article The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliability and validity of the measure to assess shared decision-making at clinical sites. Patients at sites using decision aids to promote shared decision-making for hip, knee, back, or breast cancer surgery had significantly higher scores than national cross-section samples of surgical patients for 3 of 4 comparisons and significantly higher scores for both comparisons with “usual care sites.” Reliability was supported by an intra-class correlation at the clinical site level of 0.93 and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56. The results document the reliability and validity of the measure to assess the degree of shared decision-making for surgical decisions at clinical sites. SAGE Publications 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8640277/ /pubmed/34869847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fowler, Floyd J. Sepucha, Karen R. Stringfellow, Vickie Valentine, KD Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites |
title | Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites |
title_full | Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites |
title_fullStr | Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites |
title_short | Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites |
title_sort | validation of the sdm process scale to evaluate shared decision-making at clinical sites |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fowlerfloydj validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites AT sepuchakarenr validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites AT stringfellowvickie validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites AT valentinekd validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites |