Cargando…

Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites

The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fowler, Floyd J., Sepucha, Karen R., Stringfellow, Vickie, Valentine, KD
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811
_version_ 1784609309195239424
author Fowler, Floyd J.
Sepucha, Karen R.
Stringfellow, Vickie
Valentine, KD
author_facet Fowler, Floyd J.
Sepucha, Karen R.
Stringfellow, Vickie
Valentine, KD
author_sort Fowler, Floyd J.
collection PubMed
description The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliability and validity of the measure to assess shared decision-making at clinical sites. Patients at sites using decision aids to promote shared decision-making for hip, knee, back, or breast cancer surgery had significantly higher scores than national cross-section samples of surgical patients for 3 of 4 comparisons and significantly higher scores for both comparisons with “usual care sites.” Reliability was supported by an intra-class correlation at the clinical site level of 0.93 and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56. The results document the reliability and validity of the measure to assess the degree of shared decision-making for surgical decisions at clinical sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8640277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86402772021-12-04 Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites Fowler, Floyd J. Sepucha, Karen R. Stringfellow, Vickie Valentine, KD J Patient Exp Research Article The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliability and validity of the measure to assess shared decision-making at clinical sites. Patients at sites using decision aids to promote shared decision-making for hip, knee, back, or breast cancer surgery had significantly higher scores than national cross-section samples of surgical patients for 3 of 4 comparisons and significantly higher scores for both comparisons with “usual care sites.” Reliability was supported by an intra-class correlation at the clinical site level of 0.93 and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56. The results document the reliability and validity of the measure to assess the degree of shared decision-making for surgical decisions at clinical sites. SAGE Publications 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8640277/ /pubmed/34869847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Fowler, Floyd J.
Sepucha, Karen R.
Stringfellow, Vickie
Valentine, KD
Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_full Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_fullStr Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_short Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_sort validation of the sdm process scale to evaluate shared decision-making at clinical sites
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811
work_keys_str_mv AT fowlerfloydj validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites
AT sepuchakarenr validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites
AT stringfellowvickie validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites
AT valentinekd validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites