Cargando…
Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children
BACKGROUND: The CardioSTAT is a single-lead ambulatory electrocardiography monitor that has been validated for use in adult patients. Recording is made through 2 electrodes positioned in a lead-I configuration, and the device allows monitoring for 2, 7, or 14 days. We sought to investigate the effic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.06.011 |
_version_ | 1784609363895255040 |
---|---|
author | Côté, Jean-Marc Chetaille, Philippe Abadir, Sylvia Gosselin, Louise Simonyan, David Dallaire, Frédéric |
author_facet | Côté, Jean-Marc Chetaille, Philippe Abadir, Sylvia Gosselin, Louise Simonyan, David Dallaire, Frédéric |
author_sort | Côté, Jean-Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The CardioSTAT is a single-lead ambulatory electrocardiography monitor that has been validated for use in adult patients. Recording is made through 2 electrodes positioned in a lead-I configuration, and the device allows monitoring for 2, 7, or 14 days. We sought to investigate the efficacy of this device in children with paroxysmal palpitations. METHODS: In phase I, the quality of tracings from simultaneous CardioSTAT recordings and D1-lead recordings of a standard 12-lead electrocardiography machine in 23 children were compared. Phase II was a prospective observational cohort study comparing arrhythmia detection using the CardioSTAT vs currently used devices (24-hour Holter monitor and the Cardiomemo loop recorder) in 52 children complaining of palpitations. RESULTS: In Phase I, all but 3 rhythm strips were correctly identified. The pacing spikes on 3 strips were not adequately identified by the observers for the CardioSTAT recording. In Phase II, symptomatic episodes were reported in 42%, 73%, and 100% of subjects during monitoring with the Holter, Cardiomemo, and CardioSTATdevices, respectively. An abnormal rhythm was detected in 13%, 23%, and 35% of subjects by the Holter, Cardiomemo, and CardioSTAT monitors, respectively. The underlying rhythm during symptomatic events was determined in 90% of cases with the CardioSTAT monitor, whereas it was determined in only 19% and 29% of cases using the Holter and Cardiomemo monitors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CardioSTAT monitor provided good-quality tracings and was superior to the 24-hour Holter monitor and the Cardiomemo loop recorder in determining the presence or absence of pathologic arrhythmia in the study cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8640594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86405942021-12-09 Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children Côté, Jean-Marc Chetaille, Philippe Abadir, Sylvia Gosselin, Louise Simonyan, David Dallaire, Frédéric CJC Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The CardioSTAT is a single-lead ambulatory electrocardiography monitor that has been validated for use in adult patients. Recording is made through 2 electrodes positioned in a lead-I configuration, and the device allows monitoring for 2, 7, or 14 days. We sought to investigate the efficacy of this device in children with paroxysmal palpitations. METHODS: In phase I, the quality of tracings from simultaneous CardioSTAT recordings and D1-lead recordings of a standard 12-lead electrocardiography machine in 23 children were compared. Phase II was a prospective observational cohort study comparing arrhythmia detection using the CardioSTAT vs currently used devices (24-hour Holter monitor and the Cardiomemo loop recorder) in 52 children complaining of palpitations. RESULTS: In Phase I, all but 3 rhythm strips were correctly identified. The pacing spikes on 3 strips were not adequately identified by the observers for the CardioSTAT recording. In Phase II, symptomatic episodes were reported in 42%, 73%, and 100% of subjects during monitoring with the Holter, Cardiomemo, and CardioSTATdevices, respectively. An abnormal rhythm was detected in 13%, 23%, and 35% of subjects by the Holter, Cardiomemo, and CardioSTAT monitors, respectively. The underlying rhythm during symptomatic events was determined in 90% of cases with the CardioSTAT monitor, whereas it was determined in only 19% and 29% of cases using the Holter and Cardiomemo monitors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CardioSTAT monitor provided good-quality tracings and was superior to the 24-hour Holter monitor and the Cardiomemo loop recorder in determining the presence or absence of pathologic arrhythmia in the study cohort. Elsevier 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8640594/ /pubmed/34901802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.06.011 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Côté, Jean-Marc Chetaille, Philippe Abadir, Sylvia Gosselin, Louise Simonyan, David Dallaire, Frédéric Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children |
title | Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children |
title_full | Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children |
title_short | Diagnostic Efficacy of a Single-Lead Ambulatory 14-Day ECG Monitor in Symptomatic Children |
title_sort | diagnostic efficacy of a single-lead ambulatory 14-day ecg monitor in symptomatic children |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.06.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cotejeanmarc diagnosticefficacyofasingleleadambulatory14dayecgmonitorinsymptomaticchildren AT chetaillephilippe diagnosticefficacyofasingleleadambulatory14dayecgmonitorinsymptomaticchildren AT abadirsylvia diagnosticefficacyofasingleleadambulatory14dayecgmonitorinsymptomaticchildren AT gosselinlouise diagnosticefficacyofasingleleadambulatory14dayecgmonitorinsymptomaticchildren AT simonyandavid diagnosticefficacyofasingleleadambulatory14dayecgmonitorinsymptomaticchildren AT dallairefrederic diagnosticefficacyofasingleleadambulatory14dayecgmonitorinsymptomaticchildren |