Cargando…

Continuity of care, measurement and association with hospital admission and mortality: a registry-based longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether continuity of care (COC) with a general practitioner (GP) is associated with mortality and hospital admissions for older patients We argue that the conventional continuity measure may overestimate these associations. To better reflect COC as a GP quality indicator, we pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hetlevik, Øystein, Holmås, Tor Helge, Monstad, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051958
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess whether continuity of care (COC) with a general practitioner (GP) is associated with mortality and hospital admissions for older patients We argue that the conventional continuity measure may overestimate these associations. To better reflect COC as a GP quality indicator, we present an alternative, service-based measure. DESIGN: Registry-based, population-level longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Linked data from Norwegian administrative healthcare registries, including 3989 GPs. PARTICIPANTS: 757 873 patients aged 60–90 years with ≥2 contacts with a GP during 2016 and 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause emergency hospital admissions, emergency admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions, and mortality, in 2018. RESULTS: We assessed COC using the conventional usual provider of care index (UPC(patient)) and an alternative/supplementary index (UPC(GP list)) based on the COC for all other patients enlisted with the same preferred GP. For both indices, the mean index score was 0.78. Our model controls for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, prior healthcare use and municipality-fixed effects. Overall, UPC(GP list) shows a much weaker association between COC and the outcomes. For both indices, there is a negative relationship between COC and hospital admissions. A 0.2-point increase in the index score would reduce admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions by 8.1% (CI 7.1% to 9.1%) versus merely 1.9% (0.2% to 3.5%) according to UPC(patient) and UPC(GP list), respectively. Using UPC(GP list), we find that mortality is no longer associated with COC. There was greater evidence for an association between COC and all-cause admissions among patients with low education. CONCLUSIONS: A continuity measure based on each patient’s contacts with own preferred GP may overestimate the importance of COC as a feature of the GP practice. An alternative, service-based measure of continuity could be suitable as a quality measure in primary healthcare. Facilitating continuity should be considered a health policy measure to reduce inequalities in health.