Cargando…
Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study
INTRODUCTION: Existing mobility endpoints based on functional performance, physical assessments and patient self-reporting are often affected by lack of sensitivity, limiting their utility in clinical practice. Wearable devices including inertial measurement units (IMUs) can overcome these limitatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050785 |
_version_ | 1784609378679128064 |
---|---|
author | Mazzà, Claudia Alcock, Lisa Aminian, Kamiar Becker, Clemens Bertuletti, Stefano Bonci, Tecla Brown, Philip Brozgol, Marina Buckley, Ellen Carsin, Anne-Elie Caruso, Marco Caulfield, Brian Cereatti, Andrea Chiari, Lorenzo Chynkiamis, Nikolaos Ciravegna, Fabio Del Din, Silvia Eskofier, Björn Evers, Jordi Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gazit, Eran Hansen, Clint Hausdorff, Jeffrey M Helbostad, Jorunn L Hiden, Hugo Hume, Emily Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara Ireson, Neil Keogh, Alison Kirk, Cameron Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Küderle, Arne Lanfranchi, Vitaveska Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mueller, Arne Neatrour, Isabel Niessen, Martijn Palmerini, Luca Pluimgraaff, Lucas Reggi, Luca Salis, Francesca Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Sillen, Henrik Singleton, David Soltani, Abolfazi Taraldsen, Kristin Ullrich, Martin Van Gelder, Linda Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Warmerdam, Elke Yarnall, Alison Rochester, Lynn |
author_facet | Mazzà, Claudia Alcock, Lisa Aminian, Kamiar Becker, Clemens Bertuletti, Stefano Bonci, Tecla Brown, Philip Brozgol, Marina Buckley, Ellen Carsin, Anne-Elie Caruso, Marco Caulfield, Brian Cereatti, Andrea Chiari, Lorenzo Chynkiamis, Nikolaos Ciravegna, Fabio Del Din, Silvia Eskofier, Björn Evers, Jordi Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gazit, Eran Hansen, Clint Hausdorff, Jeffrey M Helbostad, Jorunn L Hiden, Hugo Hume, Emily Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara Ireson, Neil Keogh, Alison Kirk, Cameron Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Küderle, Arne Lanfranchi, Vitaveska Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mueller, Arne Neatrour, Isabel Niessen, Martijn Palmerini, Luca Pluimgraaff, Lucas Reggi, Luca Salis, Francesca Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Sillen, Henrik Singleton, David Soltani, Abolfazi Taraldsen, Kristin Ullrich, Martin Van Gelder, Linda Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Warmerdam, Elke Yarnall, Alison Rochester, Lynn |
author_sort | Mazzà, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Existing mobility endpoints based on functional performance, physical assessments and patient self-reporting are often affected by lack of sensitivity, limiting their utility in clinical practice. Wearable devices including inertial measurement units (IMUs) can overcome these limitations by quantifying digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) both during supervised structured assessments and in real-world conditions. The validity of IMU-based methods in the real-world, however, is still limited in patient populations. Rigorous validation procedures should cover the device metrological verification, the validation of the algorithms for the DMOs computation specifically for the population of interest and in daily life situations, and the users’ perspective on the device. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was designed to establish the technical validity and patient acceptability of the approach used to quantify digital mobility in the real world by Mobilise-D, a consortium funded by the European Union (EU) as part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative, aiming at fostering regulatory approval and clinical adoption of DMOs. After defining the procedures for the metrological verification of an IMU-based device, the experimental procedures for the validation of algorithms used to calculate the DMOs are presented. These include laboratory and real-world assessment in 120 participants from five groups: healthy older adults; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, proximal femoral fracture and congestive heart failure. DMOs extracted from the monitoring device will be compared with those from different reference systems, chosen according to the contexts of observation. Questionnaires and interviews will evaluate the users’ perspective on the deployed technology and relevance of the mobility assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been granted ethics approval by the centre’s committees (London—Bloomsbury Research Ethics committee; Helsinki Committee, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre; Medical Faculties of The University of Tübingen and of the University of Kiel). Data and algorithms will be made publicly available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN (12246987). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8640671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86406712021-12-15 Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study Mazzà, Claudia Alcock, Lisa Aminian, Kamiar Becker, Clemens Bertuletti, Stefano Bonci, Tecla Brown, Philip Brozgol, Marina Buckley, Ellen Carsin, Anne-Elie Caruso, Marco Caulfield, Brian Cereatti, Andrea Chiari, Lorenzo Chynkiamis, Nikolaos Ciravegna, Fabio Del Din, Silvia Eskofier, Björn Evers, Jordi Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gazit, Eran Hansen, Clint Hausdorff, Jeffrey M Helbostad, Jorunn L Hiden, Hugo Hume, Emily Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara Ireson, Neil Keogh, Alison Kirk, Cameron Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Küderle, Arne Lanfranchi, Vitaveska Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mueller, Arne Neatrour, Isabel Niessen, Martijn Palmerini, Luca Pluimgraaff, Lucas Reggi, Luca Salis, Francesca Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Sillen, Henrik Singleton, David Soltani, Abolfazi Taraldsen, Kristin Ullrich, Martin Van Gelder, Linda Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Warmerdam, Elke Yarnall, Alison Rochester, Lynn BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Existing mobility endpoints based on functional performance, physical assessments and patient self-reporting are often affected by lack of sensitivity, limiting their utility in clinical practice. Wearable devices including inertial measurement units (IMUs) can overcome these limitations by quantifying digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) both during supervised structured assessments and in real-world conditions. The validity of IMU-based methods in the real-world, however, is still limited in patient populations. Rigorous validation procedures should cover the device metrological verification, the validation of the algorithms for the DMOs computation specifically for the population of interest and in daily life situations, and the users’ perspective on the device. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was designed to establish the technical validity and patient acceptability of the approach used to quantify digital mobility in the real world by Mobilise-D, a consortium funded by the European Union (EU) as part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative, aiming at fostering regulatory approval and clinical adoption of DMOs. After defining the procedures for the metrological verification of an IMU-based device, the experimental procedures for the validation of algorithms used to calculate the DMOs are presented. These include laboratory and real-world assessment in 120 participants from five groups: healthy older adults; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, proximal femoral fracture and congestive heart failure. DMOs extracted from the monitoring device will be compared with those from different reference systems, chosen according to the contexts of observation. Questionnaires and interviews will evaluate the users’ perspective on the deployed technology and relevance of the mobility assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been granted ethics approval by the centre’s committees (London—Bloomsbury Research Ethics committee; Helsinki Committee, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre; Medical Faculties of The University of Tübingen and of the University of Kiel). Data and algorithms will be made publicly available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN (12246987). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8640671/ /pubmed/34857567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050785 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Mazzà, Claudia Alcock, Lisa Aminian, Kamiar Becker, Clemens Bertuletti, Stefano Bonci, Tecla Brown, Philip Brozgol, Marina Buckley, Ellen Carsin, Anne-Elie Caruso, Marco Caulfield, Brian Cereatti, Andrea Chiari, Lorenzo Chynkiamis, Nikolaos Ciravegna, Fabio Del Din, Silvia Eskofier, Björn Evers, Jordi Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gazit, Eran Hansen, Clint Hausdorff, Jeffrey M Helbostad, Jorunn L Hiden, Hugo Hume, Emily Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara Ireson, Neil Keogh, Alison Kirk, Cameron Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Küderle, Arne Lanfranchi, Vitaveska Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mueller, Arne Neatrour, Isabel Niessen, Martijn Palmerini, Luca Pluimgraaff, Lucas Reggi, Luca Salis, Francesca Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Sillen, Henrik Singleton, David Soltani, Abolfazi Taraldsen, Kristin Ullrich, Martin Van Gelder, Linda Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Warmerdam, Elke Yarnall, Alison Rochester, Lynn Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
title | Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
title_full | Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
title_fullStr | Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
title_short | Technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
title_sort | technical validation of real-world monitoring of gait: a multicentric observational study |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzaclaudia technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT alcocklisa technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT aminiankamiar technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT beckerclemens technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT bertulettistefano technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT boncitecla technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT brownphilip technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT brozgolmarina technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT buckleyellen technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT carsinanneelie technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT carusomarco technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT caulfieldbrian technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT cereattiandrea technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT chiarilorenzo technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT chynkiamisnikolaos technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT ciravegnafabio technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT deldinsilvia technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT eskofierbjorn technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT eversjordi technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT garciaaymerichjudith technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT gaziteran technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT hansenclint technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT hausdorffjeffreym technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT helbostadjorunnl technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT hidenhugo technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT humeemily technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT paraschivionescuanisoara technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT iresonneil technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT keoghalison technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT kirkcameron technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT klugefelix technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT kochsarah technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT kuderlearne technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT lanfranchivitaveska technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT maetzlerwalter technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT micoamigomencarna technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT muellerarne technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT neatrourisabel technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT niessenmartijn technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT palmeriniluca technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT pluimgraafflucas technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT reggiluca technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT salisfrancesca technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT schwickertlars technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT scottkirsty technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT sharrackbasil technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT sillenhenrik technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT singletondavid technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT soltaniabolfazi technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT taraldsenkristin technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT ullrichmartin technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT vangelderlinda technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT vereijkenbeatrix technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT vogiatzisioannis technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT warmerdamelke technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT yarnallalison technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy AT rochesterlynn technicalvalidationofrealworldmonitoringofgaitamulticentricobservationalstudy |