Cargando…

Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review examined available literature on the prognostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMIC). DESIGN: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus from inception to April 2020. SETTING: Observational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Sam, Heuving, Simelina, Kawooya, Michael G, Byamugisha, Josaphat, Grobbee, Diederick E, Papageorghiou, Aris T, Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin, Rijken, Marcus J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049799
_version_ 1784609378908766208
author Ali, Sam
Heuving, Simelina
Kawooya, Michael G
Byamugisha, Josaphat
Grobbee, Diederick E
Papageorghiou, Aris T
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
Rijken, Marcus J
author_facet Ali, Sam
Heuving, Simelina
Kawooya, Michael G
Byamugisha, Josaphat
Grobbee, Diederick E
Papageorghiou, Aris T
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
Rijken, Marcus J
author_sort Ali, Sam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This systematic review examined available literature on the prognostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMIC). DESIGN: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus from inception to April 2020. SETTING: Observational or interventional studies from LMICs. PARTICIPANTS: Singleton pregnancies of any risk profile. INTERVENTIONS: Umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), uterine artery (UtA), fetal descending aorta (FDA), ductus venosus, umbilical vein and inferior vena cava. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal death, stillbirth, neonatal death, expedited delivery for fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, low birth weight, fetal growth restriction, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal acidosis, Apgar scores, preterm birth, fetal anaemia, respiratory distress syndrome, length of hospital stay, birth asphyxia and composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPO). RESULTS: We identified 2825 records, and 30 (including 4977 women) from Africa (40.0%, n=12), Asia (56.7%, n=17) and South America (3.3%, n=01) were included. Many individual studies reported associations and promising predictive values of UA Doppler for various adverse perinatal outcomes mostly in high-risk pregnancies, and moderate to high predictive values of MCA, CPR and UtA Dopplers for CAPO. A few studies suggested that the MCA and FDA may be potent predictors of fetal anaemia. No randomised clinical trial (RCT) was found. Most studies were of suboptimal quality, poorly powered and characterised by wide variations in outcome classifications, the timing for the Doppler tests and study populations. CONCLUSION: Local evidence to guide how antenatal Doppler ultrasound should be used in LMIC is lacking. Well-designed studies, preferably RCTs, are required. Standardisation of practice and classification of perinatal outcomes across countries, following the international standards, is imperative. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019128546
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8640672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86406722021-12-15 Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review Ali, Sam Heuving, Simelina Kawooya, Michael G Byamugisha, Josaphat Grobbee, Diederick E Papageorghiou, Aris T Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin Rijken, Marcus J BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: This systematic review examined available literature on the prognostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMIC). DESIGN: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus from inception to April 2020. SETTING: Observational or interventional studies from LMICs. PARTICIPANTS: Singleton pregnancies of any risk profile. INTERVENTIONS: Umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), uterine artery (UtA), fetal descending aorta (FDA), ductus venosus, umbilical vein and inferior vena cava. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal death, stillbirth, neonatal death, expedited delivery for fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, low birth weight, fetal growth restriction, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal acidosis, Apgar scores, preterm birth, fetal anaemia, respiratory distress syndrome, length of hospital stay, birth asphyxia and composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPO). RESULTS: We identified 2825 records, and 30 (including 4977 women) from Africa (40.0%, n=12), Asia (56.7%, n=17) and South America (3.3%, n=01) were included. Many individual studies reported associations and promising predictive values of UA Doppler for various adverse perinatal outcomes mostly in high-risk pregnancies, and moderate to high predictive values of MCA, CPR and UtA Dopplers for CAPO. A few studies suggested that the MCA and FDA may be potent predictors of fetal anaemia. No randomised clinical trial (RCT) was found. Most studies were of suboptimal quality, poorly powered and characterised by wide variations in outcome classifications, the timing for the Doppler tests and study populations. CONCLUSION: Local evidence to guide how antenatal Doppler ultrasound should be used in LMIC is lacking. Well-designed studies, preferably RCTs, are required. Standardisation of practice and classification of perinatal outcomes across countries, following the international standards, is imperative. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019128546 BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8640672/ /pubmed/34857564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049799 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ali, Sam
Heuving, Simelina
Kawooya, Michael G
Byamugisha, Josaphat
Grobbee, Diederick E
Papageorghiou, Aris T
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
Rijken, Marcus J
Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_fullStr Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_short Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_sort prognostic accuracy of antenatal doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049799
work_keys_str_mv AT alisam prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT heuvingsimelina prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT kawooyamichaelg prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT byamugishajosaphat prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT grobbeediedericke prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT papageorghiouarist prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT klipsteingrobuschkerstin prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT rijkenmarcusj prognosticaccuracyofantenataldopplerultrasoundforadverseperinataloutcomesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview