Cargando…

Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses

BACKGROUND: The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high, and is easy to develop into end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires kidney dialysis or kidney transplantation. Therefore, we want to explore the clinical value of magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Ping, Li, Shichao, Xu, Chuou, Li, Jiali, Tan, Fangqin, Hu, Daoyu, Kamel, Ihab, Li, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926658
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2299
_version_ 1784609406341611520
author Liang, Ping
Li, Shichao
Xu, Chuou
Li, Jiali
Tan, Fangqin
Hu, Daoyu
Kamel, Ihab
Li, Zhen
author_facet Liang, Ping
Li, Shichao
Xu, Chuou
Li, Jiali
Tan, Fangqin
Hu, Daoyu
Kamel, Ihab
Li, Zhen
author_sort Liang, Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high, and is easy to develop into end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires kidney dialysis or kidney transplantation. Therefore, we want to explore the clinical value of magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses (SLEEK) in assessing renal function in the early stage. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent abdominal MRI examination, including a coronal SLEEK sequence. The patients were divided into the control group [CG, 47 cases, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >90], the mild renal function impairment (mRI) group (48 cases, eGFR =60–90), and the moderate to severe renal function impairment (m-sRI) group (34 cases, eGFR <60). Two experienced radiologists delineated cortex and medulla regions of interest (ROIs) on SLEEK images to obtain cortex and medulla quantitative histogram parameters [Mean, Median, Percentiles (5(th), 10(th), 25(th), 75(th), and 90(th)), Skewness, Kurtosis, and Entropy] using FireVoxel. These histogram parameters were compared by proper statistical methods such as one-way analysis of variance, the χ(2) test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Four histogram parameters (Inhomogeneity(cortex), Skewness(cortex), Kurtosis(medulla), and Entropy(medulla)) differed significantly between the CG and the mRI group. One medulla (Entropy(medulla)) and nine cortex (Mean(cortex), Median(cortex), Kurtosis(cortex), Entropy(cortex), and 5(th), 10(th), 25(th), 75(th), and 90(th) Percentile(cortex)) histogram parameters were significantly different between the m-RI and m-sRI groups. The most relevant parameter to eGFR was Inhomogenity(cortex) (r=−0.450, P<0.001). Inhomogeneity(cortex) had the largest area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating the mRI group from the CG (AUC =0.718; 95% CI: 0.616–0.806), while 25(th) Percentile(cortex) generated the largest AUC (AUC =0.786; 95% CI: 0.681–0.869) for differentiating the mRI and m-sRI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative histogram parameters based on a SLEEK sequence can be used to supplement renal dysfunction assessment. Cortex histogram parameters are more valuable for evaluating renal function than medulla histogram parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8640904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86409042021-12-16 Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses Liang, Ping Li, Shichao Xu, Chuou Li, Jiali Tan, Fangqin Hu, Daoyu Kamel, Ihab Li, Zhen Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high, and is easy to develop into end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires kidney dialysis or kidney transplantation. Therefore, we want to explore the clinical value of magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses (SLEEK) in assessing renal function in the early stage. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent abdominal MRI examination, including a coronal SLEEK sequence. The patients were divided into the control group [CG, 47 cases, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >90], the mild renal function impairment (mRI) group (48 cases, eGFR =60–90), and the moderate to severe renal function impairment (m-sRI) group (34 cases, eGFR <60). Two experienced radiologists delineated cortex and medulla regions of interest (ROIs) on SLEEK images to obtain cortex and medulla quantitative histogram parameters [Mean, Median, Percentiles (5(th), 10(th), 25(th), 75(th), and 90(th)), Skewness, Kurtosis, and Entropy] using FireVoxel. These histogram parameters were compared by proper statistical methods such as one-way analysis of variance, the χ(2) test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Four histogram parameters (Inhomogeneity(cortex), Skewness(cortex), Kurtosis(medulla), and Entropy(medulla)) differed significantly between the CG and the mRI group. One medulla (Entropy(medulla)) and nine cortex (Mean(cortex), Median(cortex), Kurtosis(cortex), Entropy(cortex), and 5(th), 10(th), 25(th), 75(th), and 90(th) Percentile(cortex)) histogram parameters were significantly different between the m-RI and m-sRI groups. The most relevant parameter to eGFR was Inhomogenity(cortex) (r=−0.450, P<0.001). Inhomogeneity(cortex) had the largest area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating the mRI group from the CG (AUC =0.718; 95% CI: 0.616–0.806), while 25(th) Percentile(cortex) generated the largest AUC (AUC =0.786; 95% CI: 0.681–0.869) for differentiating the mRI and m-sRI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative histogram parameters based on a SLEEK sequence can be used to supplement renal dysfunction assessment. Cortex histogram parameters are more valuable for evaluating renal function than medulla histogram parameters. AME Publishing Company 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8640904/ /pubmed/34926658 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2299 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Liang, Ping
Li, Shichao
Xu, Chuou
Li, Jiali
Tan, Fangqin
Hu, Daoyu
Kamel, Ihab
Li, Zhen
Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
title Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
title_full Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
title_fullStr Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
title_short Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
title_sort assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926658
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-2299
work_keys_str_mv AT liangping assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT lishichao assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT xuchuou assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT lijiali assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT tanfangqin assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT hudaoyu assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT kamelihab assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses
AT lizhen assessmentofrenalfunctionusingmagneticresonancequantitativehistogramanalysisbasedonspatiallabelingwithmultipleinversionpulses