Cargando…

Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review

Endoscopic management for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones still presents a challenge for several reasons, including anatomic anomalies, patients’ individual conditions and stone features. In recent years, variable methods have emerged that have attributed to higher stone removal success rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tringali, Alberto, Costa, Deborah, Fugazza, Alessandro, Colombo, Matteo, Khalaf, Kareem, Repici, Alessandro, Anderloni, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34908801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7597
_version_ 1784609434043940864
author Tringali, Alberto
Costa, Deborah
Fugazza, Alessandro
Colombo, Matteo
Khalaf, Kareem
Repici, Alessandro
Anderloni, Andrea
author_facet Tringali, Alberto
Costa, Deborah
Fugazza, Alessandro
Colombo, Matteo
Khalaf, Kareem
Repici, Alessandro
Anderloni, Andrea
author_sort Tringali, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic management for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones still presents a challenge for several reasons, including anatomic anomalies, patients’ individual conditions and stone features. In recent years, variable methods have emerged that have attributed to higher stone removal success rates, reduced cost and lower adverse events. In this review, we outline a stepwise approach in CBD stone management. As first line therapy, endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation are recommended, due to a 30%-50% reduction of the use of mechanical lithotripsy. On the other hand, cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy has been increasingly reported as an effective and safe alternative technique to mechanical lithotripsy but remains to be reserved in special settings due to limited large-scale evidence. As discussed, findings suggest that management needs to be tailored to the patient’s characteristics and anatomical conditions. Furthermore, we evaluate the management of CBD stones in various surgical altered anatomy (Billroth II, Roux-en-Y and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). Moreover, we could conclude that cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy needs to be evaluated for primary use, rather than following a failed management option. In addition, we discuss the importance of dissecting other techniques, such as the primary use of interventional endoscopic ultrasound for the management of CBD stones when other techniques have failed. In conclusion, we recognize that endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation, mechanical lithotripsy and intraductal lithotripsy substantiate an indication to the management of difficult CBD stones, but emerging techniques are in rapid evolution with encouraging results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8641054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86410542021-12-13 Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review Tringali, Alberto Costa, Deborah Fugazza, Alessandro Colombo, Matteo Khalaf, Kareem Repici, Alessandro Anderloni, Andrea World J Gastroenterol Opinion Review Endoscopic management for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones still presents a challenge for several reasons, including anatomic anomalies, patients’ individual conditions and stone features. In recent years, variable methods have emerged that have attributed to higher stone removal success rates, reduced cost and lower adverse events. In this review, we outline a stepwise approach in CBD stone management. As first line therapy, endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation are recommended, due to a 30%-50% reduction of the use of mechanical lithotripsy. On the other hand, cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy has been increasingly reported as an effective and safe alternative technique to mechanical lithotripsy but remains to be reserved in special settings due to limited large-scale evidence. As discussed, findings suggest that management needs to be tailored to the patient’s characteristics and anatomical conditions. Furthermore, we evaluate the management of CBD stones in various surgical altered anatomy (Billroth II, Roux-en-Y and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). Moreover, we could conclude that cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy needs to be evaluated for primary use, rather than following a failed management option. In addition, we discuss the importance of dissecting other techniques, such as the primary use of interventional endoscopic ultrasound for the management of CBD stones when other techniques have failed. In conclusion, we recognize that endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation, mechanical lithotripsy and intraductal lithotripsy substantiate an indication to the management of difficult CBD stones, but emerging techniques are in rapid evolution with encouraging results. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-11-28 2021-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8641054/ /pubmed/34908801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7597 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Opinion Review
Tringali, Alberto
Costa, Deborah
Fugazza, Alessandro
Colombo, Matteo
Khalaf, Kareem
Repici, Alessandro
Anderloni, Andrea
Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review
title Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review
title_full Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review
title_fullStr Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review
title_short Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review
title_sort endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: where are we now? a comprehensive review
topic Opinion Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34908801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7597
work_keys_str_mv AT tringalialberto endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview
AT costadeborah endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview
AT fugazzaalessandro endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview
AT colombomatteo endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview
AT khalafkareem endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview
AT repicialessandro endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview
AT anderloniandrea endoscopicmanagementofdifficultcommonbileductstoneswherearewenowacomprehensivereview