Cargando…

Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. AIM: To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, ep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Agastya, Spychalski, Piotr, Antoszewska, Magdalena, Regula, Jaroslaw, Kobiela, Jarek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34908809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716
_version_ 1784609434269384704
author Patel, Agastya
Spychalski, Piotr
Antoszewska, Magdalena
Regula, Jaroslaw
Kobiela, Jarek
author_facet Patel, Agastya
Spychalski, Piotr
Antoszewska, Magdalena
Regula, Jaroslaw
Kobiela, Jarek
author_sort Patel, Agastya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. AIM: To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, epidemiological and clinical studies. METHODS: This systematic review was based on the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcome models and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until May 17, 2021. The initial search returned 2591 articles, of which, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies were categorized as basic research studies (n = 12), epidemiological studies (n = 11), and CRC treatment studies (n = 5). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool depending on the study design. RESULTS: Data from basic research indicates that PPI do not stimulate CRC development via the trophic effect of gastrin but instead may paradoxically inhibit it. These studies also suggest that PPI may have properties beneficial for CRC treatment. PPI appear to have anti-tumor properties (omeprazole, pantoprazole), and are potential T lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase inhibitors (pantoprazole, ilaprazole), and chemosensitizing agents (pantoprazole). However, these mechanisms have not been confirmed in human trials. Current epidemiological studies suggest that there is no causal association between PPI use and increased CRC risk. Treatment studies show that concomitant PPI and capecitabine use may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy resulting in poorer oncological outcomes, while also suggesting that pantoprazole may have a chemosensitizing effect with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen. CONCLUSION: An unexpected inhibitory effect of PPI on CRC carcinogenesis by way of several potential mechanisms is noted. This review identifies that different PPI agents may have differential effects on CRC treatment, with practical implications. Prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and assess the role of individual PPI agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8641055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86410552021-12-13 Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review Patel, Agastya Spychalski, Piotr Antoszewska, Magdalena Regula, Jaroslaw Kobiela, Jarek World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. AIM: To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, epidemiological and clinical studies. METHODS: This systematic review was based on the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcome models and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until May 17, 2021. The initial search returned 2591 articles, of which, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies were categorized as basic research studies (n = 12), epidemiological studies (n = 11), and CRC treatment studies (n = 5). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool depending on the study design. RESULTS: Data from basic research indicates that PPI do not stimulate CRC development via the trophic effect of gastrin but instead may paradoxically inhibit it. These studies also suggest that PPI may have properties beneficial for CRC treatment. PPI appear to have anti-tumor properties (omeprazole, pantoprazole), and are potential T lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase inhibitors (pantoprazole, ilaprazole), and chemosensitizing agents (pantoprazole). However, these mechanisms have not been confirmed in human trials. Current epidemiological studies suggest that there is no causal association between PPI use and increased CRC risk. Treatment studies show that concomitant PPI and capecitabine use may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy resulting in poorer oncological outcomes, while also suggesting that pantoprazole may have a chemosensitizing effect with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen. CONCLUSION: An unexpected inhibitory effect of PPI on CRC carcinogenesis by way of several potential mechanisms is noted. This review identifies that different PPI agents may have differential effects on CRC treatment, with practical implications. Prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and assess the role of individual PPI agents. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-11-28 2021-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8641055/ /pubmed/34908809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Patel, Agastya
Spychalski, Piotr
Antoszewska, Magdalena
Regula, Jaroslaw
Kobiela, Jarek
Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
title Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
title_full Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
title_fullStr Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
title_short Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
title_sort proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34908809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716
work_keys_str_mv AT patelagastya protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT spychalskipiotr protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT antoszewskamagdalena protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT regulajaroslaw protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT kobielajarek protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview