Cargando…
Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. AIM: To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, ep...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34908809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716 |
_version_ | 1784609434269384704 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Agastya Spychalski, Piotr Antoszewska, Magdalena Regula, Jaroslaw Kobiela, Jarek |
author_facet | Patel, Agastya Spychalski, Piotr Antoszewska, Magdalena Regula, Jaroslaw Kobiela, Jarek |
author_sort | Patel, Agastya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. AIM: To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, epidemiological and clinical studies. METHODS: This systematic review was based on the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcome models and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until May 17, 2021. The initial search returned 2591 articles, of which, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies were categorized as basic research studies (n = 12), epidemiological studies (n = 11), and CRC treatment studies (n = 5). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool depending on the study design. RESULTS: Data from basic research indicates that PPI do not stimulate CRC development via the trophic effect of gastrin but instead may paradoxically inhibit it. These studies also suggest that PPI may have properties beneficial for CRC treatment. PPI appear to have anti-tumor properties (omeprazole, pantoprazole), and are potential T lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase inhibitors (pantoprazole, ilaprazole), and chemosensitizing agents (pantoprazole). However, these mechanisms have not been confirmed in human trials. Current epidemiological studies suggest that there is no causal association between PPI use and increased CRC risk. Treatment studies show that concomitant PPI and capecitabine use may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy resulting in poorer oncological outcomes, while also suggesting that pantoprazole may have a chemosensitizing effect with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen. CONCLUSION: An unexpected inhibitory effect of PPI on CRC carcinogenesis by way of several potential mechanisms is noted. This review identifies that different PPI agents may have differential effects on CRC treatment, with practical implications. Prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and assess the role of individual PPI agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8641055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86410552021-12-13 Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review Patel, Agastya Spychalski, Piotr Antoszewska, Magdalena Regula, Jaroslaw Kobiela, Jarek World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. AIM: To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, epidemiological and clinical studies. METHODS: This systematic review was based on the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcome models and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until May 17, 2021. The initial search returned 2591 articles, of which, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies were categorized as basic research studies (n = 12), epidemiological studies (n = 11), and CRC treatment studies (n = 5). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool depending on the study design. RESULTS: Data from basic research indicates that PPI do not stimulate CRC development via the trophic effect of gastrin but instead may paradoxically inhibit it. These studies also suggest that PPI may have properties beneficial for CRC treatment. PPI appear to have anti-tumor properties (omeprazole, pantoprazole), and are potential T lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase inhibitors (pantoprazole, ilaprazole), and chemosensitizing agents (pantoprazole). However, these mechanisms have not been confirmed in human trials. Current epidemiological studies suggest that there is no causal association between PPI use and increased CRC risk. Treatment studies show that concomitant PPI and capecitabine use may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy resulting in poorer oncological outcomes, while also suggesting that pantoprazole may have a chemosensitizing effect with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen. CONCLUSION: An unexpected inhibitory effect of PPI on CRC carcinogenesis by way of several potential mechanisms is noted. This review identifies that different PPI agents may have differential effects on CRC treatment, with practical implications. Prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and assess the role of individual PPI agents. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-11-28 2021-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8641055/ /pubmed/34908809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Patel, Agastya Spychalski, Piotr Antoszewska, Magdalena Regula, Jaroslaw Kobiela, Jarek Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review |
title | Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review |
title_full | Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review |
title_short | Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review |
title_sort | proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34908809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelagastya protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview AT spychalskipiotr protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview AT antoszewskamagdalena protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview AT regulajaroslaw protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview AT kobielajarek protonpumpinhibitorsandcolorectalcancerasystematicreview |