Cargando…

We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19

INTRODUCTION: Optimism is boosted by leaders hoping for job creation, increased business spending, and a high consumption rate. In this research, we assessed the hazardous side effect for global health policies stemming from this optimism: unrealistic optimism (being unrealistically optimistic about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulesza, Wojciech, Dolinski, Dariusz, Muniak, Paweł, Derakhshan, Ali, Rizulla, Aidana, Banach, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900052
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.99592
_version_ 1784609510497714176
author Kulesza, Wojciech
Dolinski, Dariusz
Muniak, Paweł
Derakhshan, Ali
Rizulla, Aidana
Banach, Maciej
author_facet Kulesza, Wojciech
Dolinski, Dariusz
Muniak, Paweł
Derakhshan, Ali
Rizulla, Aidana
Banach, Maciej
author_sort Kulesza, Wojciech
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Optimism is boosted by leaders hoping for job creation, increased business spending, and a high consumption rate. In this research, we assessed the hazardous side effect for global health policies stemming from this optimism: unrealistic optimism (being unrealistically optimistic about future negative events), which may be responsible for new infections and may prevent the eradication of COVID-19. The goal of the research was not only to assess whether this effect exists and to find out whether such an effect is global but also to evaluate whether there are groups resistant to this effect (presenting a potential toolkit for reducing this effect). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In May and April of 2020, online surveys were administered among students in Iran, Kazakhstan, and Poland respectively to assess the unrealistic optimism/pessimism. In study 1/objective 1, the survey was conducted twice (in a period of about 3 weeks) to assess the potential change (due to the anonymous codes delivered by the participants, we were able to make follow-ups between the same participants) in time in the 3 countries. In the first wave, 1611 participants took the survey. In the second wave, there were 1426 respondents. In study 2, the survey was conducted among 207 Polish healthcare workers of the frontline hospital. RESULTS: In study 1 across the 3 cultures (the first wave for unmatched data by the code of the specific participant F(1, 1608) = 419.2; p < 0.001, and for matched data F(1, 372) = 167.195; p < 0.001; η(p)² = 0.31; η(p)² = 0.21; the second wave for unmatched data F(1, 1423) = 359.61; p < 0.001; η(p)² = 0.2, and for matched F(1, 372) = 166.84; p < 0.001; η(p)² = 0.31), unrealistic optimism is present, and importantly it is constant in time. In study 2, unrealistic optimism was not found among healthcare professionals, who we hypothesized due to the medical knowledge are not inclined to be unrealistically optimistic t(206) = 1.06; p = 0.290, d = 0.07. CONCLUSION: Medical education of COVID-19 severity might reduce unrealistic optimism, which may be the reason why pandemic restrictions are not being respected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8641513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86415132021-12-09 We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19 Kulesza, Wojciech Dolinski, Dariusz Muniak, Paweł Derakhshan, Ali Rizulla, Aidana Banach, Maciej Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Optimism is boosted by leaders hoping for job creation, increased business spending, and a high consumption rate. In this research, we assessed the hazardous side effect for global health policies stemming from this optimism: unrealistic optimism (being unrealistically optimistic about future negative events), which may be responsible for new infections and may prevent the eradication of COVID-19. The goal of the research was not only to assess whether this effect exists and to find out whether such an effect is global but also to evaluate whether there are groups resistant to this effect (presenting a potential toolkit for reducing this effect). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In May and April of 2020, online surveys were administered among students in Iran, Kazakhstan, and Poland respectively to assess the unrealistic optimism/pessimism. In study 1/objective 1, the survey was conducted twice (in a period of about 3 weeks) to assess the potential change (due to the anonymous codes delivered by the participants, we were able to make follow-ups between the same participants) in time in the 3 countries. In the first wave, 1611 participants took the survey. In the second wave, there were 1426 respondents. In study 2, the survey was conducted among 207 Polish healthcare workers of the frontline hospital. RESULTS: In study 1 across the 3 cultures (the first wave for unmatched data by the code of the specific participant F(1, 1608) = 419.2; p < 0.001, and for matched data F(1, 372) = 167.195; p < 0.001; η(p)² = 0.31; η(p)² = 0.21; the second wave for unmatched data F(1, 1423) = 359.61; p < 0.001; η(p)² = 0.2, and for matched F(1, 372) = 166.84; p < 0.001; η(p)² = 0.31), unrealistic optimism is present, and importantly it is constant in time. In study 2, unrealistic optimism was not found among healthcare professionals, who we hypothesized due to the medical knowledge are not inclined to be unrealistically optimistic t(206) = 1.06; p = 0.290, d = 0.07. CONCLUSION: Medical education of COVID-19 severity might reduce unrealistic optimism, which may be the reason why pandemic restrictions are not being respected. Termedia Publishing House 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8641513/ /pubmed/34900052 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.99592 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Termedia & Banach https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kulesza, Wojciech
Dolinski, Dariusz
Muniak, Paweł
Derakhshan, Ali
Rizulla, Aidana
Banach, Maciej
We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19
title We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19
title_full We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19
title_fullStr We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19
title_short We are infected with the new, mutated virus UO-COVID-19
title_sort we are infected with the new, mutated virus uo-covid-19
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900052
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.99592
work_keys_str_mv AT kuleszawojciech weareinfectedwiththenewmutatedvirusuocovid19
AT dolinskidariusz weareinfectedwiththenewmutatedvirusuocovid19
AT muniakpaweł weareinfectedwiththenewmutatedvirusuocovid19
AT derakhshanali weareinfectedwiththenewmutatedvirusuocovid19
AT rizullaaidana weareinfectedwiththenewmutatedvirusuocovid19
AT banachmaciej weareinfectedwiththenewmutatedvirusuocovid19