Cargando…

The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: A novel category of non-coding circular RNAs (circRNAs) has been found to be dysregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and significantly contribute to its progression. However, the feasibility of using circRNA as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC remains to be elucidated. Herein, we aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ru-Dong, Guan, Min, Zhou, Zhe, Dong, Shu-Xiao, Liu, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.766208
_version_ 1784609539405905920
author Li, Ru-Dong
Guan, Min
Zhou, Zhe
Dong, Shu-Xiao
Liu, Qian
author_facet Li, Ru-Dong
Guan, Min
Zhou, Zhe
Dong, Shu-Xiao
Liu, Qian
author_sort Li, Ru-Dong
collection PubMed
description Background: A novel category of non-coding circular RNAs (circRNAs) has been found to be dysregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and significantly contribute to its progression. However, the feasibility of using circRNA as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC remains to be elucidated. Herein, we aimed to comprehensively collect and analyze evidence regarding the potential application of circRNAs as diagnostic indicators for CRC. Methods: A comprehensive retrieval of relevant studies dating from January, 2015 to December 2020, was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of circRNA for CRC, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC), were obtained from the included studies. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Statistical analysis was performed using STAT and RevMan software. Results: Eighteen studies, involving a total of 2021 individuals, were included in the present meta-analysis. The specimens examined included tissue, serum, and plasma. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), of circRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 0.78 (0.71–0.83), 0.73 (0.68–0.78), 9.68 (6.76–13.85), 2.92 (2.45–3.50), 0.30 (0.23–0.39), and 0.81 (0.78–0.85), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the upregulated circRNAs in the tissue or plasma possessed relatively higher diagnostic values for CRC than the downregulated circRNAs. There was no significant difference between the tissue-derived and non-tissue-derived circRNA subgroups. Conclusion: circRNA may be used as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC because of its relatively high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing CRC patients from normal controls. Further prospective studies are needed to identify more representative circRNAs as diagnostic markers for CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8641696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86416962021-12-04 The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Li, Ru-Dong Guan, Min Zhou, Zhe Dong, Shu-Xiao Liu, Qian Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: A novel category of non-coding circular RNAs (circRNAs) has been found to be dysregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and significantly contribute to its progression. However, the feasibility of using circRNA as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC remains to be elucidated. Herein, we aimed to comprehensively collect and analyze evidence regarding the potential application of circRNAs as diagnostic indicators for CRC. Methods: A comprehensive retrieval of relevant studies dating from January, 2015 to December 2020, was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of circRNA for CRC, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC), were obtained from the included studies. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Statistical analysis was performed using STAT and RevMan software. Results: Eighteen studies, involving a total of 2021 individuals, were included in the present meta-analysis. The specimens examined included tissue, serum, and plasma. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), of circRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 0.78 (0.71–0.83), 0.73 (0.68–0.78), 9.68 (6.76–13.85), 2.92 (2.45–3.50), 0.30 (0.23–0.39), and 0.81 (0.78–0.85), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the upregulated circRNAs in the tissue or plasma possessed relatively higher diagnostic values for CRC than the downregulated circRNAs. There was no significant difference between the tissue-derived and non-tissue-derived circRNA subgroups. Conclusion: circRNA may be used as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC because of its relatively high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing CRC patients from normal controls. Further prospective studies are needed to identify more representative circRNAs as diagnostic markers for CRC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8641696/ /pubmed/34869475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.766208 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Guan, Zhou, Dong and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Li, Ru-Dong
Guan, Min
Zhou, Zhe
Dong, Shu-Xiao
Liu, Qian
The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort role of circrnas in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.766208
work_keys_str_mv AT lirudong theroleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT guanmin theroleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT zhouzhe theroleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT dongshuxiao theroleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT liuqian theroleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT lirudong roleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT guanmin roleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT zhouzhe roleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT dongshuxiao roleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT liuqian roleofcircrnasinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis