Cargando…

Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: In September 2018, the government of India banned 328 fixed dose combinations (FDCs), 24 of which are combinations containing topical steroids. To assess what impact can be expected from this regulatory action, we analyzed reports of adverse drug events due to topical cortico...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jhaj, Ratinder, Asati, Dinesh Prasad, Chaudhary, Deepa, Sadasivam, Balakrishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854405
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_728_19
_version_ 1784609550398128128
author Jhaj, Ratinder
Asati, Dinesh Prasad
Chaudhary, Deepa
Sadasivam, Balakrishnan
author_facet Jhaj, Ratinder
Asati, Dinesh Prasad
Chaudhary, Deepa
Sadasivam, Balakrishnan
author_sort Jhaj, Ratinder
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: In September 2018, the government of India banned 328 fixed dose combinations (FDCs), 24 of which are combinations containing topical steroids. To assess what impact can be expected from this regulatory action, we analyzed reports of adverse drug events due to topical corticosteroids at a hospital-based pharmacovigilance center between January 2017 and August 2018. RESULTS: Among 34 different steroid-containing FDCs responsible for 485 reports of ADEs with topical steroids, only three preparations, accounting for 50.10% of ADEs, come under the umbrella of the recent ban. Clobetasone propionate (68.87%) and betamethasone (28.45%) were the corticosteroids most frequently associated with adverse events. Most of the steroid preparations (87.84%) had been bought without a prescription for the treatment of dermatophytoses (76.70%). Males (77.73%) were predominantly affected, and nearly half (47.43%) of the patients were between 21 and 30 years of age. Skin atrophy (50.10%), striae (25.54%), and hypopigmentation (19.79%) were the major ADEs. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the cutaneous adverse effects were due to topical steroid combinations which are still widely available over the counter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8641741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86417412021-12-14 Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough Jhaj, Ratinder Asati, Dinesh Prasad Chaudhary, Deepa Sadasivam, Balakrishnan Indian J Pharmacol Clinical Research Articles OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: In September 2018, the government of India banned 328 fixed dose combinations (FDCs), 24 of which are combinations containing topical steroids. To assess what impact can be expected from this regulatory action, we analyzed reports of adverse drug events due to topical corticosteroids at a hospital-based pharmacovigilance center between January 2017 and August 2018. RESULTS: Among 34 different steroid-containing FDCs responsible for 485 reports of ADEs with topical steroids, only three preparations, accounting for 50.10% of ADEs, come under the umbrella of the recent ban. Clobetasone propionate (68.87%) and betamethasone (28.45%) were the corticosteroids most frequently associated with adverse events. Most of the steroid preparations (87.84%) had been bought without a prescription for the treatment of dermatophytoses (76.70%). Males (77.73%) were predominantly affected, and nearly half (47.43%) of the patients were between 21 and 30 years of age. Skin atrophy (50.10%), striae (25.54%), and hypopigmentation (19.79%) were the major ADEs. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the cutaneous adverse effects were due to topical steroid combinations which are still widely available over the counter. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8641741/ /pubmed/34854405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_728_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Articles
Jhaj, Ratinder
Asati, Dinesh Prasad
Chaudhary, Deepa
Sadasivam, Balakrishnan
Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
title Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
title_full Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
title_fullStr Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
title_full_unstemmed Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
title_short Topical steroid containing combinations: Burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
title_sort topical steroid containing combinations: burden of adverse effects and why the recent regulatory action may not be enough
topic Clinical Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854405
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_728_19
work_keys_str_mv AT jhajratinder topicalsteroidcontainingcombinationsburdenofadverseeffectsandwhytherecentregulatoryactionmaynotbeenough
AT asatidineshprasad topicalsteroidcontainingcombinationsburdenofadverseeffectsandwhytherecentregulatoryactionmaynotbeenough
AT chaudharydeepa topicalsteroidcontainingcombinationsburdenofadverseeffectsandwhytherecentregulatoryactionmaynotbeenough
AT sadasivambalakrishnan topicalsteroidcontainingcombinationsburdenofadverseeffectsandwhytherecentregulatoryactionmaynotbeenough