Cargando…
Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of GPS in outcomes of patients with severe aortic ste...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236786 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269 |
_version_ | 1784609555877986304 |
---|---|
author | Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz Kilic, Salih Yildirim, Arafat Kurt, Ibrahim Halil |
author_facet | Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz Kilic, Salih Yildirim, Arafat Kurt, Ibrahim Halil |
author_sort | Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of GPS in outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis who were treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: The study population consisted of 79 patients who underwent TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2019 in our clinic. Echocardiographic and laboratory data were recorded before the procedure and GPS was scored as 0, 1, or 2, based on serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II scoring system was used for risk stratification. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative in-hospital mortality, hospitalization due to cardiac causes, or mortality within a year. RESULTS: The 79 patients were classified into two groups according to outcomes. Fifteen patients (19%) reached the primary endpoints at one year of follow-up. Compared to the patients who did not reach the endpoints, these 15 patients were not different in terms of age, preoperative mean gradient, and ejection fraction (P>0.05 for all). GPS was the only laboratory parameter with statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.008) and multivariate analysis showed that GPS was independent predictor of primary endpoints (P=0.012, odds ratio 4.51, 95% confidence interval 1.39-14.60). CONCLUSION: GPS is an easy, noninvasive laboratory test which may be used as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8641765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86417652021-12-08 Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz Kilic, Salih Yildirim, Arafat Kurt, Ibrahim Halil Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of GPS in outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis who were treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: The study population consisted of 79 patients who underwent TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2019 in our clinic. Echocardiographic and laboratory data were recorded before the procedure and GPS was scored as 0, 1, or 2, based on serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II scoring system was used for risk stratification. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative in-hospital mortality, hospitalization due to cardiac causes, or mortality within a year. RESULTS: The 79 patients were classified into two groups according to outcomes. Fifteen patients (19%) reached the primary endpoints at one year of follow-up. Compared to the patients who did not reach the endpoints, these 15 patients were not different in terms of age, preoperative mean gradient, and ejection fraction (P>0.05 for all). GPS was the only laboratory parameter with statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.008) and multivariate analysis showed that GPS was independent predictor of primary endpoints (P=0.012, odds ratio 4.51, 95% confidence interval 1.39-14.60). CONCLUSION: GPS is an easy, noninvasive laboratory test which may be used as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8641765/ /pubmed/34236786 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz Kilic, Salih Yildirim, Arafat Kurt, Ibrahim Halil Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI |
title | Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI |
title_full | Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI |
title_fullStr | Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI |
title_full_unstemmed | Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI |
title_short | Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI |
title_sort | glasgow prognostic score as a marker of mortality after tavi |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236786 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abaciogluozgeozcan glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi AT koyunsevernerminyildiz glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi AT kilicsalih glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi AT yildirimarafat glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi AT kurtibrahimhalil glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi |