Cargando…

Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI

INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of GPS in outcomes of patients with severe aortic ste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan, Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz, Kilic, Salih, Yildirim, Arafat, Kurt, Ibrahim Halil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236786
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269
_version_ 1784609555877986304
author Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan
Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz
Kilic, Salih
Yildirim, Arafat
Kurt, Ibrahim Halil
author_facet Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan
Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz
Kilic, Salih
Yildirim, Arafat
Kurt, Ibrahim Halil
author_sort Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of GPS in outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis who were treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: The study population consisted of 79 patients who underwent TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2019 in our clinic. Echocardiographic and laboratory data were recorded before the procedure and GPS was scored as 0, 1, or 2, based on serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II scoring system was used for risk stratification. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative in-hospital mortality, hospitalization due to cardiac causes, or mortality within a year. RESULTS: The 79 patients were classified into two groups according to outcomes. Fifteen patients (19%) reached the primary endpoints at one year of follow-up. Compared to the patients who did not reach the endpoints, these 15 patients were not different in terms of age, preoperative mean gradient, and ejection fraction (P>0.05 for all). GPS was the only laboratory parameter with statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.008) and multivariate analysis showed that GPS was independent predictor of primary endpoints (P=0.012, odds ratio 4.51, 95% confidence interval 1.39-14.60). CONCLUSION: GPS is an easy, noninvasive laboratory test which may be used as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8641765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86417652021-12-08 Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz Kilic, Salih Yildirim, Arafat Kurt, Ibrahim Halil Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects host systemic inflammatory response and has been reported to be significant as a prognostic indicator in cancer-bearing patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of GPS in outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis who were treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: The study population consisted of 79 patients who underwent TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2019 in our clinic. Echocardiographic and laboratory data were recorded before the procedure and GPS was scored as 0, 1, or 2, based on serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II scoring system was used for risk stratification. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative in-hospital mortality, hospitalization due to cardiac causes, or mortality within a year. RESULTS: The 79 patients were classified into two groups according to outcomes. Fifteen patients (19%) reached the primary endpoints at one year of follow-up. Compared to the patients who did not reach the endpoints, these 15 patients were not different in terms of age, preoperative mean gradient, and ejection fraction (P>0.05 for all). GPS was the only laboratory parameter with statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.008) and multivariate analysis showed that GPS was independent predictor of primary endpoints (P=0.012, odds ratio 4.51, 95% confidence interval 1.39-14.60). CONCLUSION: GPS is an easy, noninvasive laboratory test which may be used as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8641765/ /pubmed/34236786 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abacioglu, Ozge Ozcan
Koyunsever, Nermin Yildiz
Kilic, Salih
Yildirim, Arafat
Kurt, Ibrahim Halil
Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
title Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
title_full Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
title_fullStr Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
title_full_unstemmed Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
title_short Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI
title_sort glasgow prognostic score as a marker of mortality after tavi
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8641765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236786
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269
work_keys_str_mv AT abaciogluozgeozcan glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi
AT koyunsevernerminyildiz glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi
AT kilicsalih glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi
AT yildirimarafat glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi
AT kurtibrahimhalil glasgowprognosticscoreasamarkerofmortalityaftertavi