Cargando…
Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) as a prognostic factor for the visual efficacy of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 92 DME eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment, which were stratifi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3033219 |
_version_ | 1784609606529449984 |
---|---|
author | Dou, Ningxin Yu, Shanshan Tsui, Ching-Kit Yang, Boyu Lin, Jianqiang Lu, Xi Xu, Yue Wu, Benjuan Zhao, Jinfeng Liang, Xiaoling |
author_facet | Dou, Ningxin Yu, Shanshan Tsui, Ching-Kit Yang, Boyu Lin, Jianqiang Lu, Xi Xu, Yue Wu, Benjuan Zhao, Jinfeng Liang, Xiaoling |
author_sort | Dou, Ningxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) as a prognostic factor for the visual efficacy of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 92 DME eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment, which were stratified as responders (≥5 letters gained) and nonresponders (<5 letters gained or lost). Baseline systematic features and optical coherence tomography features, including the CVI, adjusted ellipsoid zone (EZ) reflectivity, subretinal fluid (SRF), and disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline CVI was significantly lower in nonresponders than in responders (0.66 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.05, and 0.72 ± 0.05, p = 0.014). After adjusting for other factors, the baseline CVI, DRIL, SRF, and adjusted EZ reflectivity were significantly associated with visual outcomes (CVI: odds ratio (OR) = 0.17, p = 0.006; adjusted EZ reflectivity: OR = 0.56, p = 0.007; DRIL: OR = 6.71, p = 0.001; and SRF: OR = 0.29, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: DME patients with a higher CVI, higher adjusted EZ reflectivity, the presence of SRF, and the absence of DRIL at baseline were more likely to gain >5 letters in visual acuity after anti-VEGF treatment. CVI may serve as a novel biomarker for visual response to anti-VEGF treatment in DME. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8642029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86420292021-12-04 Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema Dou, Ningxin Yu, Shanshan Tsui, Ching-Kit Yang, Boyu Lin, Jianqiang Lu, Xi Xu, Yue Wu, Benjuan Zhao, Jinfeng Liang, Xiaoling J Diabetes Res Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) as a prognostic factor for the visual efficacy of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 92 DME eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment, which were stratified as responders (≥5 letters gained) and nonresponders (<5 letters gained or lost). Baseline systematic features and optical coherence tomography features, including the CVI, adjusted ellipsoid zone (EZ) reflectivity, subretinal fluid (SRF), and disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline CVI was significantly lower in nonresponders than in responders (0.66 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.05, and 0.72 ± 0.05, p = 0.014). After adjusting for other factors, the baseline CVI, DRIL, SRF, and adjusted EZ reflectivity were significantly associated with visual outcomes (CVI: odds ratio (OR) = 0.17, p = 0.006; adjusted EZ reflectivity: OR = 0.56, p = 0.007; DRIL: OR = 6.71, p = 0.001; and SRF: OR = 0.29, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: DME patients with a higher CVI, higher adjusted EZ reflectivity, the presence of SRF, and the absence of DRIL at baseline were more likely to gain >5 letters in visual acuity after anti-VEGF treatment. CVI may serve as a novel biomarker for visual response to anti-VEGF treatment in DME. Hindawi 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8642029/ /pubmed/34869776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3033219 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ningxin Dou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dou, Ningxin Yu, Shanshan Tsui, Ching-Kit Yang, Boyu Lin, Jianqiang Lu, Xi Xu, Yue Wu, Benjuan Zhao, Jinfeng Liang, Xiaoling Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema |
title | Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_full | Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_fullStr | Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_full_unstemmed | Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_short | Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_sort | choroidal vascularity index as a biomarker for visual response to antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment in diabetic macular edema |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3033219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douningxin choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT yushanshan choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT tsuichingkit choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT yangboyu choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT linjianqiang choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT luxi choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT xuyue choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT wubenjuan choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT zhaojinfeng choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema AT liangxiaoling choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema |