Cargando…

Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) as a prognostic factor for the visual efficacy of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 92 DME eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment, which were stratifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dou, Ningxin, Yu, Shanshan, Tsui, Ching-Kit, Yang, Boyu, Lin, Jianqiang, Lu, Xi, Xu, Yue, Wu, Benjuan, Zhao, Jinfeng, Liang, Xiaoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3033219
_version_ 1784609606529449984
author Dou, Ningxin
Yu, Shanshan
Tsui, Ching-Kit
Yang, Boyu
Lin, Jianqiang
Lu, Xi
Xu, Yue
Wu, Benjuan
Zhao, Jinfeng
Liang, Xiaoling
author_facet Dou, Ningxin
Yu, Shanshan
Tsui, Ching-Kit
Yang, Boyu
Lin, Jianqiang
Lu, Xi
Xu, Yue
Wu, Benjuan
Zhao, Jinfeng
Liang, Xiaoling
author_sort Dou, Ningxin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) as a prognostic factor for the visual efficacy of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 92 DME eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment, which were stratified as responders (≥5 letters gained) and nonresponders (<5 letters gained or lost). Baseline systematic features and optical coherence tomography features, including the CVI, adjusted ellipsoid zone (EZ) reflectivity, subretinal fluid (SRF), and disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline CVI was significantly lower in nonresponders than in responders (0.66 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.05, and 0.72 ± 0.05, p = 0.014). After adjusting for other factors, the baseline CVI, DRIL, SRF, and adjusted EZ reflectivity were significantly associated with visual outcomes (CVI: odds ratio (OR) = 0.17, p = 0.006; adjusted EZ reflectivity: OR = 0.56, p = 0.007; DRIL: OR = 6.71, p = 0.001; and SRF: OR = 0.29, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: DME patients with a higher CVI, higher adjusted EZ reflectivity, the presence of SRF, and the absence of DRIL at baseline were more likely to gain >5 letters in visual acuity after anti-VEGF treatment. CVI may serve as a novel biomarker for visual response to anti-VEGF treatment in DME.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86420292021-12-04 Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema Dou, Ningxin Yu, Shanshan Tsui, Ching-Kit Yang, Boyu Lin, Jianqiang Lu, Xi Xu, Yue Wu, Benjuan Zhao, Jinfeng Liang, Xiaoling J Diabetes Res Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) as a prognostic factor for the visual efficacy of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 92 DME eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment, which were stratified as responders (≥5 letters gained) and nonresponders (<5 letters gained or lost). Baseline systematic features and optical coherence tomography features, including the CVI, adjusted ellipsoid zone (EZ) reflectivity, subretinal fluid (SRF), and disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline CVI was significantly lower in nonresponders than in responders (0.66 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.05, and 0.72 ± 0.05, p = 0.014). After adjusting for other factors, the baseline CVI, DRIL, SRF, and adjusted EZ reflectivity were significantly associated with visual outcomes (CVI: odds ratio (OR) = 0.17, p = 0.006; adjusted EZ reflectivity: OR = 0.56, p = 0.007; DRIL: OR = 6.71, p = 0.001; and SRF: OR = 0.29, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: DME patients with a higher CVI, higher adjusted EZ reflectivity, the presence of SRF, and the absence of DRIL at baseline were more likely to gain >5 letters in visual acuity after anti-VEGF treatment. CVI may serve as a novel biomarker for visual response to anti-VEGF treatment in DME. Hindawi 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8642029/ /pubmed/34869776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3033219 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ningxin Dou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dou, Ningxin
Yu, Shanshan
Tsui, Ching-Kit
Yang, Boyu
Lin, Jianqiang
Lu, Xi
Xu, Yue
Wu, Benjuan
Zhao, Jinfeng
Liang, Xiaoling
Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
title Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_fullStr Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full_unstemmed Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_short Choroidal Vascularity Index as a Biomarker for Visual Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_sort choroidal vascularity index as a biomarker for visual response to antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment in diabetic macular edema
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3033219
work_keys_str_mv AT douningxin choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT yushanshan choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT tsuichingkit choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT yangboyu choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT linjianqiang choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT luxi choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT xuyue choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT wubenjuan choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT zhaojinfeng choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema
AT liangxiaoling choroidalvascularityindexasabiomarkerforvisualresponsetoantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentindiabeticmacularedema