Cargando…
Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
OBJECTIVE: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211047390 |
_version_ | 1784609610973315072 |
---|---|
author | De Silva, Kushan Enticott, Joanne Barton, Christopher Forbes, Andrew Saha, Sajal Nikam, Rujuta |
author_facet | De Silva, Kushan Enticott, Joanne Barton, Christopher Forbes, Andrew Saha, Sajal Nikam, Rujuta |
author_sort | De Silva, Kushan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We aim to identify machine learning prediction models for type 2 diabetes in clinical and community care settings and determine their predictive performance. METHODS: The systematic review of English language machine learning predictive modeling studies in 12 databases will be conducted. Studies predicting type 2 diabetes in predefined clinical or community settings are eligible. Standard CHARMS and TRIPOD guidelines will guide data extraction. Methodological quality will be assessed using a predefined risk of bias assessment tool. The extent of validation will be categorized by Reilly–Evans levels. Primary outcomes include model performance metrics of discrimination ability, calibration, and classification accuracy. Secondary outcomes include candidate predictors, algorithms used, level of validation, and intended use of models. The random-effects meta-analysis of c-indices will be performed to evaluate discrimination abilities. The c-indices will be pooled per prediction model, per model type, and per algorithm. Publication bias will be assessed through funnel plots and regression tests. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to estimate the effects of study quality and missing data on primary outcome. The sources of heterogeneity will be assessed through meta-regression. Subgroup analyses will be performed for primary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required, as no primary or personal data are collected. Findings will be disseminated through scientific sessions and peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130886 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8642048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86420482021-12-04 Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies De Silva, Kushan Enticott, Joanne Barton, Christopher Forbes, Andrew Saha, Sajal Nikam, Rujuta Digit Health Research Protocol OBJECTIVE: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We aim to identify machine learning prediction models for type 2 diabetes in clinical and community care settings and determine their predictive performance. METHODS: The systematic review of English language machine learning predictive modeling studies in 12 databases will be conducted. Studies predicting type 2 diabetes in predefined clinical or community settings are eligible. Standard CHARMS and TRIPOD guidelines will guide data extraction. Methodological quality will be assessed using a predefined risk of bias assessment tool. The extent of validation will be categorized by Reilly–Evans levels. Primary outcomes include model performance metrics of discrimination ability, calibration, and classification accuracy. Secondary outcomes include candidate predictors, algorithms used, level of validation, and intended use of models. The random-effects meta-analysis of c-indices will be performed to evaluate discrimination abilities. The c-indices will be pooled per prediction model, per model type, and per algorithm. Publication bias will be assessed through funnel plots and regression tests. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to estimate the effects of study quality and missing data on primary outcome. The sources of heterogeneity will be assessed through meta-regression. Subgroup analyses will be performed for primary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required, as no primary or personal data are collected. Findings will be disseminated through scientific sessions and peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130886 SAGE Publications 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8642048/ /pubmed/34868616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211047390 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Protocol De Silva, Kushan Enticott, Joanne Barton, Christopher Forbes, Andrew Saha, Sajal Nikam, Rujuta Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
title | Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes
prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic
review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
title_full | Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes
prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic
review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
title_fullStr | Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes
prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic
review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes
prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic
review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
title_short | Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes
prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic
review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
title_sort | use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes
prediction in clinical and community care settings: protocol for a systematic
review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies |
topic | Research Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211047390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desilvakushan useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies AT enticottjoanne useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies AT bartonchristopher useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies AT forbesandrew useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies AT sahasajal useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies AT nikamrujuta useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies |