Cargando…

Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies

OBJECTIVE: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Silva, Kushan, Enticott, Joanne, Barton, Christopher, Forbes, Andrew, Saha, Sajal, Nikam, Rujuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211047390
_version_ 1784609610973315072
author De Silva, Kushan
Enticott, Joanne
Barton, Christopher
Forbes, Andrew
Saha, Sajal
Nikam, Rujuta
author_facet De Silva, Kushan
Enticott, Joanne
Barton, Christopher
Forbes, Andrew
Saha, Sajal
Nikam, Rujuta
author_sort De Silva, Kushan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We aim to identify machine learning prediction models for type 2 diabetes in clinical and community care settings and determine their predictive performance. METHODS: The systematic review of English language machine learning predictive modeling studies in 12 databases will be conducted. Studies predicting type 2 diabetes in predefined clinical or community settings are eligible. Standard CHARMS and TRIPOD guidelines will guide data extraction. Methodological quality will be assessed using a predefined risk of bias assessment tool. The extent of validation will be categorized by Reilly–Evans levels. Primary outcomes include model performance metrics of discrimination ability, calibration, and classification accuracy. Secondary outcomes include candidate predictors, algorithms used, level of validation, and intended use of models. The random-effects meta-analysis of c-indices will be performed to evaluate discrimination abilities. The c-indices will be pooled per prediction model, per model type, and per algorithm. Publication bias will be assessed through funnel plots and regression tests. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to estimate the effects of study quality and missing data on primary outcome. The sources of heterogeneity will be assessed through meta-regression. Subgroup analyses will be performed for primary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required, as no primary or personal data are collected. Findings will be disseminated through scientific sessions and peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130886
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86420482021-12-04 Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies De Silva, Kushan Enticott, Joanne Barton, Christopher Forbes, Andrew Saha, Sajal Nikam, Rujuta Digit Health Research Protocol OBJECTIVE: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We aim to identify machine learning prediction models for type 2 diabetes in clinical and community care settings and determine their predictive performance. METHODS: The systematic review of English language machine learning predictive modeling studies in 12 databases will be conducted. Studies predicting type 2 diabetes in predefined clinical or community settings are eligible. Standard CHARMS and TRIPOD guidelines will guide data extraction. Methodological quality will be assessed using a predefined risk of bias assessment tool. The extent of validation will be categorized by Reilly–Evans levels. Primary outcomes include model performance metrics of discrimination ability, calibration, and classification accuracy. Secondary outcomes include candidate predictors, algorithms used, level of validation, and intended use of models. The random-effects meta-analysis of c-indices will be performed to evaluate discrimination abilities. The c-indices will be pooled per prediction model, per model type, and per algorithm. Publication bias will be assessed through funnel plots and regression tests. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to estimate the effects of study quality and missing data on primary outcome. The sources of heterogeneity will be assessed through meta-regression. Subgroup analyses will be performed for primary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required, as no primary or personal data are collected. Findings will be disseminated through scientific sessions and peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130886 SAGE Publications 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8642048/ /pubmed/34868616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211047390 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Protocol
De Silva, Kushan
Enticott, Joanne
Barton, Christopher
Forbes, Andrew
Saha, Sajal
Nikam, Rujuta
Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
title Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
title_full Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
title_fullStr Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
title_full_unstemmed Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
title_short Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
title_sort use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
topic Research Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34868616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211047390
work_keys_str_mv AT desilvakushan useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies
AT enticottjoanne useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies
AT bartonchristopher useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies
AT forbesandrew useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies
AT sahasajal useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies
AT nikamrujuta useandperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsfortype2diabetespredictioninclinicalandcommunitycaresettingsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictivemodelingstudies