Cargando…

Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework

BACKGROUND: Active learning (AL) is recognized as a valuable learning strategy. OBJECTIVE: Using a conceptual framework, the objective of this study was to conduct a faculty self- and needs assessment to determine the extent to which the faculty at one college of pharmacy perceived they already carr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Merlyn, Farris, Charlotte, Martinez, Mardoqueo, Demps, Elaine, Hernández-Muñoz, José J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211044590
_version_ 1784609612122554368
author Joseph, Merlyn
Farris, Charlotte
Martinez, Mardoqueo
Demps, Elaine
Hernández-Muñoz, José J.
author_facet Joseph, Merlyn
Farris, Charlotte
Martinez, Mardoqueo
Demps, Elaine
Hernández-Muñoz, José J.
author_sort Joseph, Merlyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Active learning (AL) is recognized as a valuable learning strategy. OBJECTIVE: Using a conceptual framework, the objective of this study was to conduct a faculty self- and needs assessment to determine the extent to which the faculty at one college of pharmacy perceived they already carried out AL, describe faculty challenges, and evaluate faculty examples of AL techniques. METHODS: A 19-question survey was administered in July 2017 to all 50 college faculty. Survey question types included multiple-choice single- or multiple-answer questions and open-ended questions. For validity, Medina's conceptual framework of 4 key elements for the effective administration of AL was used. For reliability, the draft survey questions were reviewed multiple times and revised accordingly. RESULTS: Thirty-five faculty members, 70%, completed the survey in full. The majority of the faculty perceived that they carried out 3 of the 4 key elements during lectures: activate prior knowledge (74%), involve the majority of students (89%), and provide feedback (91%). However, only 37% stated they promoted metacognition, another key element. Our qualitative analysis identified (1) faculty had misconceptions about most of Medina's conceptual framework elements, (2) challenges to AL implementation included: need for more technology training, perception that AL requires cutting course material, beliefs that AL does not work, and fear of poor evaluations with AL implementation, and (3) suggestions to improve AL included: faculty development, training students on the importance of AL, and integrating AL throughout the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Although most faculties indicated they integrated AL in their teaching, faculty misconceptions, and beliefs suggest the need for long-term faculty and organizational development using strategies aligned with or seeking to change the beliefs of the faculty and college system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86420532021-12-04 Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework Joseph, Merlyn Farris, Charlotte Martinez, Mardoqueo Demps, Elaine Hernández-Muñoz, José J. J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research BACKGROUND: Active learning (AL) is recognized as a valuable learning strategy. OBJECTIVE: Using a conceptual framework, the objective of this study was to conduct a faculty self- and needs assessment to determine the extent to which the faculty at one college of pharmacy perceived they already carried out AL, describe faculty challenges, and evaluate faculty examples of AL techniques. METHODS: A 19-question survey was administered in July 2017 to all 50 college faculty. Survey question types included multiple-choice single- or multiple-answer questions and open-ended questions. For validity, Medina's conceptual framework of 4 key elements for the effective administration of AL was used. For reliability, the draft survey questions were reviewed multiple times and revised accordingly. RESULTS: Thirty-five faculty members, 70%, completed the survey in full. The majority of the faculty perceived that they carried out 3 of the 4 key elements during lectures: activate prior knowledge (74%), involve the majority of students (89%), and provide feedback (91%). However, only 37% stated they promoted metacognition, another key element. Our qualitative analysis identified (1) faculty had misconceptions about most of Medina's conceptual framework elements, (2) challenges to AL implementation included: need for more technology training, perception that AL requires cutting course material, beliefs that AL does not work, and fear of poor evaluations with AL implementation, and (3) suggestions to improve AL included: faculty development, training students on the importance of AL, and integrating AL throughout the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Although most faculties indicated they integrated AL in their teaching, faculty misconceptions, and beliefs suggest the need for long-term faculty and organizational development using strategies aligned with or seeking to change the beliefs of the faculty and college system. SAGE Publications 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8642053/ /pubmed/34869902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211044590 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Joseph, Merlyn
Farris, Charlotte
Martinez, Mardoqueo
Demps, Elaine
Hernández-Muñoz, José J.
Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework
title Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework
title_full Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework
title_fullStr Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework
title_full_unstemmed Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework
title_short Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework
title_sort faculty self- and needs assessment of preparedness for integrating active learning based on medina's conceptual framework
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34869902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211044590
work_keys_str_mv AT josephmerlyn facultyselfandneedsassessmentofpreparednessforintegratingactivelearningbasedonmedinasconceptualframework
AT farrischarlotte facultyselfandneedsassessmentofpreparednessforintegratingactivelearningbasedonmedinasconceptualframework
AT martinezmardoqueo facultyselfandneedsassessmentofpreparednessforintegratingactivelearningbasedonmedinasconceptualframework
AT dempselaine facultyselfandneedsassessmentofpreparednessforintegratingactivelearningbasedonmedinasconceptualframework
AT hernandezmunozjosej facultyselfandneedsassessmentofpreparednessforintegratingactivelearningbasedonmedinasconceptualframework