Cargando…
Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w |
_version_ | 1784609654717808640 |
---|---|
author | Tuecking, Lars-Rene Savov, Peter Windhagen, Henning Jennings, Simon Nathwani, Dinesh Ettinger, Max |
author_facet | Tuecking, Lars-Rene Savov, Peter Windhagen, Henning Jennings, Simon Nathwani, Dinesh Ettinger, Max |
author_sort | Tuecking, Lars-Rene |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher’s exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8642254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86422542021-12-17 Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA Tuecking, Lars-Rene Savov, Peter Windhagen, Henning Jennings, Simon Nathwani, Dinesh Ettinger, Max Orthopade Originalien BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher’s exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups. Springer Medizin 2021-10-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8642254/ /pubmed/34714372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Tuecking, Lars-Rene Savov, Peter Windhagen, Henning Jennings, Simon Nathwani, Dinesh Ettinger, Max Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA |
title | Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA |
title_full | Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA |
title_fullStr | Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA |
title_full_unstemmed | Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA |
title_short | Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA |
title_sort | imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from uka to tka: surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic tka |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tueckinglarsrene imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka AT savovpeter imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka AT windhagenhenning imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka AT jenningssimon imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka AT nathwanidinesh imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka AT ettingermax imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka |