Cargando…

Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuecking, Lars-Rene, Savov, Peter, Windhagen, Henning, Jennings, Simon, Nathwani, Dinesh, Ettinger, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w
_version_ 1784609654717808640
author Tuecking, Lars-Rene
Savov, Peter
Windhagen, Henning
Jennings, Simon
Nathwani, Dinesh
Ettinger, Max
author_facet Tuecking, Lars-Rene
Savov, Peter
Windhagen, Henning
Jennings, Simon
Nathwani, Dinesh
Ettinger, Max
author_sort Tuecking, Lars-Rene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher’s exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86422542021-12-17 Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA Tuecking, Lars-Rene Savov, Peter Windhagen, Henning Jennings, Simon Nathwani, Dinesh Ettinger, Max Orthopade Originalien BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA (n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher’s exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment (p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group (n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group (n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups. Springer Medizin 2021-10-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8642254/ /pubmed/34714372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Tuecking, Lars-Rene
Savov, Peter
Windhagen, Henning
Jennings, Simon
Nathwani, Dinesh
Ettinger, Max
Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
title Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
title_full Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
title_fullStr Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
title_full_unstemmed Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
title_short Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA: Surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic TKA
title_sort imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from uka to tka: surgical technique and case-control study compared with primary robotic tka
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04182-w
work_keys_str_mv AT tueckinglarsrene imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka
AT savovpeter imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka
AT windhagenhenning imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka
AT jenningssimon imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka
AT nathwanidinesh imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka
AT ettingermax imagelessroboticassistedrevisionarthroplastyfromukatotkasurgicaltechniqueandcasecontrolstudycomparedwithprimaryrobotictka