Cargando…

Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures are fundamental tools when assessing effectiveness of treatments. The challenge lies in the interpretation: which magnitude of change in score is meaningful for the patients? The minimal important difference (MID) is defined as the small...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karjalainen, Päivi K., Mattsson, Nina K., Jalkanen, Jyrki T., Nieminen, Kari, Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z
_version_ 1784609663761776640
author Karjalainen, Päivi K.
Mattsson, Nina K.
Jalkanen, Jyrki T.
Nieminen, Kari
Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
author_facet Karjalainen, Päivi K.
Mattsson, Nina K.
Jalkanen, Jyrki T.
Nieminen, Kari
Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
author_sort Karjalainen, Päivi K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures are fundamental tools when assessing effectiveness of treatments. The challenge lies in the interpretation: which magnitude of change in score is meaningful for the patients? The minimal important difference (MID) is defined as the smallest difference in score that patients perceive as important. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) represents the value of score beyond which patients consider themselves well. We aimed to determine the MID and PASS for Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6) in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: We used data from 2704 POP surgeries from a prospective, population-based cohort. MID was determined with three anchor-based and one distribution-based method. PASS was defined using two different methods. Medians of the estimates were identified. RESULTS: The MID estimates with (1) mean change, (2) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, (3) 75th percentile, and (4) distribution-based method varied between 22.9–25.0 (median 24.2) points for PFDI-20 and 9.0–12.5 (median 11.3) for POPDI-6. The PASS cutoffs with (1) 75th percentile and (2) ROC curve method varied between 57.7–62.5 (median 60.0) for PFDI-20 and 16.7–17.7 (median 17.2) for POPDI-6. CONCLUSION: A mean difference of 24 points in the PFDI-20 or 11 points in the POPDI-6 can be used as a clinically relevant difference between groups. Postoperative scores ≤ 60 for PFDI-20 and ≤ 17 for POPDI-6 signify acceptable symptom state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86423462021-12-17 Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery Karjalainen, Päivi K. Mattsson, Nina K. Jalkanen, Jyrki T. Nieminen, Kari Tolppanen, Anna-Maija Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures are fundamental tools when assessing effectiveness of treatments. The challenge lies in the interpretation: which magnitude of change in score is meaningful for the patients? The minimal important difference (MID) is defined as the smallest difference in score that patients perceive as important. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) represents the value of score beyond which patients consider themselves well. We aimed to determine the MID and PASS for Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6) in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: We used data from 2704 POP surgeries from a prospective, population-based cohort. MID was determined with three anchor-based and one distribution-based method. PASS was defined using two different methods. Medians of the estimates were identified. RESULTS: The MID estimates with (1) mean change, (2) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, (3) 75th percentile, and (4) distribution-based method varied between 22.9–25.0 (median 24.2) points for PFDI-20 and 9.0–12.5 (median 11.3) for POPDI-6. The PASS cutoffs with (1) 75th percentile and (2) ROC curve method varied between 57.7–62.5 (median 60.0) for PFDI-20 and 16.7–17.7 (median 17.2) for POPDI-6. CONCLUSION: A mean difference of 24 points in the PFDI-20 or 11 points in the POPDI-6 can be used as a clinically relevant difference between groups. Postoperative scores ≤ 60 for PFDI-20 and ≤ 17 for POPDI-6 signify acceptable symptom state. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8642346/ /pubmed/32876715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Karjalainen, Päivi K.
Mattsson, Nina K.
Jalkanen, Jyrki T.
Nieminen, Kari
Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery
title Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery
title_full Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery
title_fullStr Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery
title_full_unstemmed Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery
title_short Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery
title_sort minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for pfdi-20 and popdi-6 in pop surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z
work_keys_str_mv AT karjalainenpaivik minimalimportantdifferenceandpatientacceptablesymptomstateforpfdi20andpopdi6inpopsurgery
AT mattssonninak minimalimportantdifferenceandpatientacceptablesymptomstateforpfdi20andpopdi6inpopsurgery
AT jalkanenjyrkit minimalimportantdifferenceandpatientacceptablesymptomstateforpfdi20andpopdi6inpopsurgery
AT nieminenkari minimalimportantdifferenceandpatientacceptablesymptomstateforpfdi20andpopdi6inpopsurgery
AT tolppanenannamaija minimalimportantdifferenceandpatientacceptablesymptomstateforpfdi20andpopdi6inpopsurgery