Cargando…
When randomisation is not good enough: Matching groups in intervention studies
Randomised assignment of individuals to treatment and controls groups is often considered the gold standard to draw valid conclusions about the efficacy of an intervention. In practice, randomisation can lead to accidental differences due to chance. Researchers have offered alternatives to reduce su...
Autores principales: | Sella, Francesco, Raz, Gal, Cohen Kadosh, Roi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01970-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predicting learning and achievement using GABA and glutamate concentrations in human development
por: Zacharopoulos, George, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The effect of parietal glutamate/GABA balance on test anxiety levels in early childhood in a cross-sectional and longitudinal study
por: Zacharopoulos, George, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Real-time linkage: when is near enough good enough?
por: Irvine, Katrina, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Behavioral Change: The Intermediary Influence of the Brain
por: Harty, Siobhán, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The impact of a lack of mathematical education on brain development and future attainment
por: Zacharopoulos, George, et al.
Publicado: (2021)