Cargando…

Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()

BACKGROUND: Physicians have had to perform numerous extubation procedures during the prolonged coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic. Future pandemics caused by unknown pathogen may also present a risk of exposure to infectious droplets and aerosols. AIM: This study evaluated the ability of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasegawa, Gen, Sakai, Wataru, Chaki, Tomohiro, Tachibana, Shunsuke, Kokita, Atsushi, Kato, Takenori, Nishimura, Hidekazu, Yamakage, Michiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100193
_version_ 1784609753533513728
author Hasegawa, Gen
Sakai, Wataru
Chaki, Tomohiro
Tachibana, Shunsuke
Kokita, Atsushi
Kato, Takenori
Nishimura, Hidekazu
Yamakage, Michiaki
author_facet Hasegawa, Gen
Sakai, Wataru
Chaki, Tomohiro
Tachibana, Shunsuke
Kokita, Atsushi
Kato, Takenori
Nishimura, Hidekazu
Yamakage, Michiaki
author_sort Hasegawa, Gen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physicians have had to perform numerous extubation procedures during the prolonged coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic. Future pandemics caused by unknown pathogen may also present a risk of exposure to infectious droplets and aerosols. AIM: This study evaluated the ability of a newly developed aerosol barrier, “Extubation-Aerosol (EA)-Shield” to provide maximum protection from aerosol exposure during extubation via an aerosolised particle count and high-quality visualisation assessments. METHODS: We employed a cough model having parameters similar to humans and used micron oil aerosol as well as titanium dioxide as aerosol tracers. Aerosol barrier techniques employing a face mask (group M) and EA-Shield (group H) were compared. FINDINGS: The primary outcome was the difference in the number of particles contacting the physician's face before and after extubation. The maximum distances of aerosol dispersal after extubation were measured as the secondary outcomes. All aerosolised particles of the two tracers were significantly smaller in group H than in group M (p < 0.05). In addition, the sagittal and axial maximum distances and sagittal areas of aerosol dispersal for 3, 5, and 10 s after extubation were significantly smaller in group H than in group M (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This model indicates that EA-Shield could be highly effective in reducing aerosol exposure during extubation. Therefore, we recommend using it as an aerosol barrier when an infectious aerosol risk is suspected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86428342021-12-06 Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study() Hasegawa, Gen Sakai, Wataru Chaki, Tomohiro Tachibana, Shunsuke Kokita, Atsushi Kato, Takenori Nishimura, Hidekazu Yamakage, Michiaki Infect Prev Pract Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Physicians have had to perform numerous extubation procedures during the prolonged coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic. Future pandemics caused by unknown pathogen may also present a risk of exposure to infectious droplets and aerosols. AIM: This study evaluated the ability of a newly developed aerosol barrier, “Extubation-Aerosol (EA)-Shield” to provide maximum protection from aerosol exposure during extubation via an aerosolised particle count and high-quality visualisation assessments. METHODS: We employed a cough model having parameters similar to humans and used micron oil aerosol as well as titanium dioxide as aerosol tracers. Aerosol barrier techniques employing a face mask (group M) and EA-Shield (group H) were compared. FINDINGS: The primary outcome was the difference in the number of particles contacting the physician's face before and after extubation. The maximum distances of aerosol dispersal after extubation were measured as the secondary outcomes. All aerosolised particles of the two tracers were significantly smaller in group H than in group M (p < 0.05). In addition, the sagittal and axial maximum distances and sagittal areas of aerosol dispersal for 3, 5, and 10 s after extubation were significantly smaller in group H than in group M (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This model indicates that EA-Shield could be highly effective in reducing aerosol exposure during extubation. Therefore, we recommend using it as an aerosol barrier when an infectious aerosol risk is suspected. Elsevier 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8642834/ /pubmed/34901825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100193 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hasegawa, Gen
Sakai, Wataru
Chaki, Tomohiro
Tachibana, Shunsuke
Kokita, Atsushi
Kato, Takenori
Nishimura, Hidekazu
Yamakage, Michiaki
Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
title Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
title_full Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
title_fullStr Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
title_full_unstemmed Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
title_short Investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
title_sort investigations into the efficacy of a novel extubation-aerosol shield: a cough model study()
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34901825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100193
work_keys_str_mv AT hasegawagen investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT sakaiwataru investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT chakitomohiro investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT tachibanashunsuke investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT kokitaatsushi investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT katotakenori investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT nishimurahidekazu investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy
AT yamakagemichiaki investigationsintotheefficacyofanovelextubationaerosolshieldacoughmodelstudy