Cargando…
Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers
OBJECTIVES: There has been increasing interest in the management of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (SwD). Its prevalence, particularly in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs), is underappreciated. As the standard diagnostic tests are either invasive or scarce, valid parent-reported o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00549-3 |
_version_ | 1784609760246497280 |
---|---|
author | Baqays, Abdulsalam Zenke, Julianna Campbell, Sandra Johannsen, Wendy Rashid, Marghalara Seikaly, Hadi El-Hakim, Hamdy |
author_facet | Baqays, Abdulsalam Zenke, Julianna Campbell, Sandra Johannsen, Wendy Rashid, Marghalara Seikaly, Hadi El-Hakim, Hamdy |
author_sort | Baqays, Abdulsalam |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: There has been increasing interest in the management of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (SwD). Its prevalence, particularly in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs), is underappreciated. As the standard diagnostic tests are either invasive or scarce, valid parent-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires could play a pivotal role in the understanding and managing SwD in this group. This article reviewed the literature on PRO questionnaires pertaining to SwD in OHITs. DATA SOURCE: A librarian searched Prospero, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, HaPI, CINAHL, and SCOPUS until February 2021 using the MeSH terms for deglutition and screening methods. REVIEW METHOD: Questionnaires that examined disease-specific or eating and feeding concerns or difficulties were excluded. Two reviewers independently identified PRO questionnaires for SwD that were used in OHITs and extracted the author names, publication year, questionnaire name, the studied population, and the reported psychometric assessments. A quality assessment was performed based on consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and updated criteria for good measurement properties. RESULTS: Of the 3488 screened articles, we identified only two questionnaires, the pediatric version of the Eating Assessment Tool (PEDI-EAT-10) and the PRO questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in OHITs. The PEDI-EAT-10 authors assessed the validity and reliability on children with cerebral palsy. However, concerns were identified regarding the developmental process and the internal structure validity. The PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs meets criteria but has not yet been validated in the population of interest nor its psychometric properties assessed. CONCLUSION: Two instruments were identified. The PED-EAT-10 exhibits methodological flaws, while Edmonton PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs awaits construct validation and could fill the current knowledge gap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-021-00549-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8642864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86428642021-12-06 Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers Baqays, Abdulsalam Zenke, Julianna Campbell, Sandra Johannsen, Wendy Rashid, Marghalara Seikaly, Hadi El-Hakim, Hamdy J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Review OBJECTIVES: There has been increasing interest in the management of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (SwD). Its prevalence, particularly in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs), is underappreciated. As the standard diagnostic tests are either invasive or scarce, valid parent-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires could play a pivotal role in the understanding and managing SwD in this group. This article reviewed the literature on PRO questionnaires pertaining to SwD in OHITs. DATA SOURCE: A librarian searched Prospero, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, HaPI, CINAHL, and SCOPUS until February 2021 using the MeSH terms for deglutition and screening methods. REVIEW METHOD: Questionnaires that examined disease-specific or eating and feeding concerns or difficulties were excluded. Two reviewers independently identified PRO questionnaires for SwD that were used in OHITs and extracted the author names, publication year, questionnaire name, the studied population, and the reported psychometric assessments. A quality assessment was performed based on consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and updated criteria for good measurement properties. RESULTS: Of the 3488 screened articles, we identified only two questionnaires, the pediatric version of the Eating Assessment Tool (PEDI-EAT-10) and the PRO questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in OHITs. The PEDI-EAT-10 authors assessed the validity and reliability on children with cerebral palsy. However, concerns were identified regarding the developmental process and the internal structure validity. The PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs meets criteria but has not yet been validated in the population of interest nor its psychometric properties assessed. CONCLUSION: Two instruments were identified. The PED-EAT-10 exhibits methodological flaws, while Edmonton PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs awaits construct validation and could fill the current knowledge gap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-021-00549-3. BioMed Central 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8642864/ /pubmed/34863293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00549-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Baqays, Abdulsalam Zenke, Julianna Campbell, Sandra Johannsen, Wendy Rashid, Marghalara Seikaly, Hadi El-Hakim, Hamdy Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
title | Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
title_full | Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
title_short | Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
title_sort | systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00549-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baqaysabdulsalam systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers AT zenkejulianna systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers AT campbellsandra systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers AT johannsenwendy systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers AT rashidmarghalara systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers AT seikalyhadi systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers AT elhakimhamdy systematicreviewofvalidatedparentreportedquestionnairesassessingswallowingdysfunctioninotherwisehealthyinfantsandtoddlers |