Cargando…

Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications of a novel piston technique versus the Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defects after lower limb infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who had been treated at our department for lower extr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Jiafei, Yin, Zifei, Cheng, Pengfei, Han, Pei, Shen, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02844-1
_version_ 1784609765680218112
author Du, Jiafei
Yin, Zifei
Cheng, Pengfei
Han, Pei
Shen, Hao
author_facet Du, Jiafei
Yin, Zifei
Cheng, Pengfei
Han, Pei
Shen, Hao
author_sort Du, Jiafei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications of a novel piston technique versus the Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defects after lower limb infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who had been treated at our department for lower extremity bone defects following osteomyelitis. There were 38 men and three women with a mean age of 43.41 (range, 12–69 years). The infected bone defects involved 36 tibias and five femurs. The piston technique (PT, group A) was used in 12 patients and the Ilizarov technique (IT, group B) in 29 patients. The mean follow-up period was 28.50 months (PT) and 29.90 months (IT). The modified Application of Methods of Illizarov (ASAMI) criteria was used to evaluate bone healing and functional recovery. RESULTS: Complete eradication of the infection and union of docking sites were accomplished in both groups. The mean external fixator index (EFI) was 42.32 days/cm in group A versus 58.85 days/cm in group B (p < 0.001). The bone outcomes were similar between groups A and B (p = 0.558) (excellent [9 vs. 19], good [3 vs.10]); group A showed better functional outcomes than group B (p < 0.05) (excellent [7 vs. 6], good [4 vs. 12], fair [0 vs. 10] and poor [1 vs. 1]). Pain was the most common complaint during follow-up, and group A had fewer cases of pin tract infection (1 vs. 6), adjacent joint stiffness (3 vs. 8), and delayed healing of the joint (0 vs. 3). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory bone healing can be achieved by using both PT and IT, although PT demonstrated better functional results, lower EFI, and allowed early removal of the external fixation. We found that this novel piston technique can improve the comfort of patients, reduce the incidence of complications, and provide rapid and convenient rehabilitation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02844-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86428912021-12-06 Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection Du, Jiafei Yin, Zifei Cheng, Pengfei Han, Pei Shen, Hao J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications of a novel piston technique versus the Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defects after lower limb infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who had been treated at our department for lower extremity bone defects following osteomyelitis. There were 38 men and three women with a mean age of 43.41 (range, 12–69 years). The infected bone defects involved 36 tibias and five femurs. The piston technique (PT, group A) was used in 12 patients and the Ilizarov technique (IT, group B) in 29 patients. The mean follow-up period was 28.50 months (PT) and 29.90 months (IT). The modified Application of Methods of Illizarov (ASAMI) criteria was used to evaluate bone healing and functional recovery. RESULTS: Complete eradication of the infection and union of docking sites were accomplished in both groups. The mean external fixator index (EFI) was 42.32 days/cm in group A versus 58.85 days/cm in group B (p < 0.001). The bone outcomes were similar between groups A and B (p = 0.558) (excellent [9 vs. 19], good [3 vs.10]); group A showed better functional outcomes than group B (p < 0.05) (excellent [7 vs. 6], good [4 vs. 12], fair [0 vs. 10] and poor [1 vs. 1]). Pain was the most common complaint during follow-up, and group A had fewer cases of pin tract infection (1 vs. 6), adjacent joint stiffness (3 vs. 8), and delayed healing of the joint (0 vs. 3). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory bone healing can be achieved by using both PT and IT, although PT demonstrated better functional results, lower EFI, and allowed early removal of the external fixation. We found that this novel piston technique can improve the comfort of patients, reduce the incidence of complications, and provide rapid and convenient rehabilitation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02844-1. BioMed Central 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8642891/ /pubmed/34863237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02844-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Du, Jiafei
Yin, Zifei
Cheng, Pengfei
Han, Pei
Shen, Hao
Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
title Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
title_full Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
title_fullStr Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
title_full_unstemmed Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
title_short Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
title_sort novel piston technique versus ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02844-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dujiafei novelpistontechniqueversusilizarovtechniquefortherepairofbonedefectafterlowerlimbinfection
AT yinzifei novelpistontechniqueversusilizarovtechniquefortherepairofbonedefectafterlowerlimbinfection
AT chengpengfei novelpistontechniqueversusilizarovtechniquefortherepairofbonedefectafterlowerlimbinfection
AT hanpei novelpistontechniqueversusilizarovtechniquefortherepairofbonedefectafterlowerlimbinfection
AT shenhao novelpistontechniqueversusilizarovtechniquefortherepairofbonedefectafterlowerlimbinfection