Cargando…
A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Sexual problems are frequently reported after treatment with radiotherapy (RT) for gynaecological cancer (GC), in particular after combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (EBRT+BT). Studies demonstrate that psychosexual support should include cognitive behavioural intervent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08991-2 |
_version_ | 1784609768502984704 |
---|---|
author | Suvaal, Isabelle Hummel, Susanna B. Mens, Jan-Willem M. van Doorn, Helena C. van den Hout, Wilbert B. Creutzberg, Carien L. ter Kuile, Moniek M. |
author_facet | Suvaal, Isabelle Hummel, Susanna B. Mens, Jan-Willem M. van Doorn, Helena C. van den Hout, Wilbert B. Creutzberg, Carien L. ter Kuile, Moniek M. |
author_sort | Suvaal, Isabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sexual problems are frequently reported after treatment with radiotherapy (RT) for gynaecological cancer (GC), in particular after combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (EBRT+BT). Studies demonstrate that psychosexual support should include cognitive behavioural interventions and involvement of the patient’s partner, if available. Therefore, we developed a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention, including these key components. The intervention was previously pilot-tested and results demonstrated that this intervention improves women’s sexual functioning and increases dilator compliance. The objective of the current study is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of the intervention compared to optimal care as usual (CAU). We expect that women who receive the intervention will report a statistically significant greater improvement in sexual functioning and – for women who receive EBRT+BT – higher compliance with dilator use, from baseline to 12 months post-RT than women who receive optimal care as usual (CAU). METHODS/DESIGN: The intervention is evaluated in the SPARC (Sexual rehabilitation Programme After Radiotherapy for gynaecological Cancer) study, a multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary endpoint is sexual functioning. Secondary outcomes include body image, fear of sexual activity, sexual-, treatment-related- and psychological distress, health-related quality of life and relationship satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted in which the costs of the intervention will be related to shifts in other health care costs and the impact on patient outcome. The study sample will consist of 220 women with GC treated with RT in specialized GC treatment centres (N = 10). Participants are randomized to either the intervention- or CAU control group (1:1), and within each centre stratified by type of radiotherapy (EBRT+BT vs. EBRT only) and having a partner (yes/no). All women complete questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT (T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively). DISCUSSION: There is a need to improve sexual functioning after RT for GC. This RCT will provide evidence about the (cost-)effectiveness of a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention. If proven effective, the intervention will be a much needed addition to care offered to GC survivors and will result in improved quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03611517. Registered 2 August 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8642903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86429032021-12-06 A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial Suvaal, Isabelle Hummel, Susanna B. Mens, Jan-Willem M. van Doorn, Helena C. van den Hout, Wilbert B. Creutzberg, Carien L. ter Kuile, Moniek M. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sexual problems are frequently reported after treatment with radiotherapy (RT) for gynaecological cancer (GC), in particular after combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (EBRT+BT). Studies demonstrate that psychosexual support should include cognitive behavioural interventions and involvement of the patient’s partner, if available. Therefore, we developed a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention, including these key components. The intervention was previously pilot-tested and results demonstrated that this intervention improves women’s sexual functioning and increases dilator compliance. The objective of the current study is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of the intervention compared to optimal care as usual (CAU). We expect that women who receive the intervention will report a statistically significant greater improvement in sexual functioning and – for women who receive EBRT+BT – higher compliance with dilator use, from baseline to 12 months post-RT than women who receive optimal care as usual (CAU). METHODS/DESIGN: The intervention is evaluated in the SPARC (Sexual rehabilitation Programme After Radiotherapy for gynaecological Cancer) study, a multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary endpoint is sexual functioning. Secondary outcomes include body image, fear of sexual activity, sexual-, treatment-related- and psychological distress, health-related quality of life and relationship satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted in which the costs of the intervention will be related to shifts in other health care costs and the impact on patient outcome. The study sample will consist of 220 women with GC treated with RT in specialized GC treatment centres (N = 10). Participants are randomized to either the intervention- or CAU control group (1:1), and within each centre stratified by type of radiotherapy (EBRT+BT vs. EBRT only) and having a partner (yes/no). All women complete questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT (T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively). DISCUSSION: There is a need to improve sexual functioning after RT for GC. This RCT will provide evidence about the (cost-)effectiveness of a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention. If proven effective, the intervention will be a much needed addition to care offered to GC survivors and will result in improved quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03611517. Registered 2 August 2018. BioMed Central 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8642903/ /pubmed/34863145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08991-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Suvaal, Isabelle Hummel, Susanna B. Mens, Jan-Willem M. van Doorn, Helena C. van den Hout, Wilbert B. Creutzberg, Carien L. ter Kuile, Moniek M. A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title | A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (sparc study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08991-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suvaalisabelle asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hummelsusannab asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mensjanwillemm asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandoornhelenac asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenhoutwilbertb asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT creutzbergcarienl asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT terkuilemoniekm asexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suvaalisabelle sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hummelsusannab sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mensjanwillemm sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandoornhelenac sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenhoutwilbertb sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT creutzbergcarienl sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT terkuilemoniekm sexualrehabilitationinterventionforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerreceivingradiotherapysparcstudydesignofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial |