Cargando…

The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valluri, Sruthi, Mason, Susan M., Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa, French, Simone A., Harnack, Lisa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7
_version_ 1784609770728062976
author Valluri, Sruthi
Mason, Susan M.
Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa
French, Simone A.
Harnack, Lisa J.
author_facet Valluri, Sruthi
Mason, Susan M.
Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa
French, Simone A.
Harnack, Lisa J.
author_sort Valluri, Sruthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and restrictions on foods high in added sugar. To date, however, no study has assessed the impact of these interventions on the benefit cycle, a pattern of rapid depletion of SNAP benefits that has been linked to worsening nutrition and health outcomes over the benefit month. METHODS: Low-income households not currently enrolled in SNAP (n = 249) received benefits every 4 weeks for 12 weeks on a study-specific benefit card. Households were randomized to one of four study arms: 1) incentive (30% incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with study benefits), 2) restriction (not allowed to buy sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candy using study benefits), 3) incentive plus restriction, or 4) control (no incentive or restriction). Weekly household food expenditures were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, financial incentives increased fruit and vegetable purchases, but only in the first 2 weeks after benefit disbursement. Restrictions decreased expenditures on foods high in added sugar throughout the benefit month, but the magnitude of the impact decreased as the month progressed. Notably, restrictions mitigated cyclical expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Policies to improve nutrition outcomes among SNAP participants should consider including targeted interventions in the second half of the month to address the benefit cycle and attendant nutrition outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02643576. Retrospectively registered December 22, 2014. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86429172021-12-06 The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial Valluri, Sruthi Mason, Susan M. Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa French, Simone A. Harnack, Lisa J. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and restrictions on foods high in added sugar. To date, however, no study has assessed the impact of these interventions on the benefit cycle, a pattern of rapid depletion of SNAP benefits that has been linked to worsening nutrition and health outcomes over the benefit month. METHODS: Low-income households not currently enrolled in SNAP (n = 249) received benefits every 4 weeks for 12 weeks on a study-specific benefit card. Households were randomized to one of four study arms: 1) incentive (30% incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with study benefits), 2) restriction (not allowed to buy sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candy using study benefits), 3) incentive plus restriction, or 4) control (no incentive or restriction). Weekly household food expenditures were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, financial incentives increased fruit and vegetable purchases, but only in the first 2 weeks after benefit disbursement. Restrictions decreased expenditures on foods high in added sugar throughout the benefit month, but the magnitude of the impact decreased as the month progressed. Notably, restrictions mitigated cyclical expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Policies to improve nutrition outcomes among SNAP participants should consider including targeted interventions in the second half of the month to address the benefit cycle and attendant nutrition outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02643576. Retrospectively registered December 22, 2014. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7. BioMed Central 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8642917/ /pubmed/34863192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Valluri, Sruthi
Mason, Susan M.
Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa
French, Simone A.
Harnack, Lisa J.
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vallurisruthi theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT masonsusanm theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT petersonhikaruhanawa theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT frenchsimonea theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harnacklisaj theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vallurisruthi impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT masonsusanm impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT petersonhikaruhanawa impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT frenchsimonea impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harnacklisaj impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial