Cargando…

Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty

BACKGROUND: Ethics consultation is recognized as an opportunity to share responsibility for difficult decisions in prenatal medicine, where moral intuitions are often unable to lead to a settled decision. It remains unclear, however, if the general standards of ethics consultation are applicable to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, Dagmar, Clarke, Angus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34861862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00730-3
_version_ 1784609787453898752
author Schmitz, Dagmar
Clarke, Angus
author_facet Schmitz, Dagmar
Clarke, Angus
author_sort Schmitz, Dagmar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ethics consultation is recognized as an opportunity to share responsibility for difficult decisions in prenatal medicine, where moral intuitions are often unable to lead to a settled decision. It remains unclear, however, if the general standards of ethics consultation are applicable to the very particular setting of pregnancy. MAIN TEXT: We sought to analyze the special nature of disagreements, conflicts and value uncertainties in prenatal medicine as well as the ways in which an ethics consultation service (ECS) could possibly respond to them and illustrated our results with a case example. Ethics facilitation and conflict mediation, currently, have no broadly consented normative framework encompassing prenatal diagnosis and therapy as well as reproductive choice to draw on. Even so, they can still be helpful instruments for ethically challenging decision-making in prenatal medicine provided two additional rules are respected: For the time being, ECSs should (a) refrain from issuing content-heavy recommendations in prenatal medicine and (b) should not initiate conflict mediations that would involve the pregnant woman or couple as a conflict party. CONCLUSION: It seems to be vital that ethics consultants as well as health care professionals acknowledge the current limitations and pitfalls of ethics consultation in prenatal medicine and together engage in the advancement of standards for this particularly complex setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8642991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86429912021-12-06 Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty Schmitz, Dagmar Clarke, Angus BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: Ethics consultation is recognized as an opportunity to share responsibility for difficult decisions in prenatal medicine, where moral intuitions are often unable to lead to a settled decision. It remains unclear, however, if the general standards of ethics consultation are applicable to the very particular setting of pregnancy. MAIN TEXT: We sought to analyze the special nature of disagreements, conflicts and value uncertainties in prenatal medicine as well as the ways in which an ethics consultation service (ECS) could possibly respond to them and illustrated our results with a case example. Ethics facilitation and conflict mediation, currently, have no broadly consented normative framework encompassing prenatal diagnosis and therapy as well as reproductive choice to draw on. Even so, they can still be helpful instruments for ethically challenging decision-making in prenatal medicine provided two additional rules are respected: For the time being, ECSs should (a) refrain from issuing content-heavy recommendations in prenatal medicine and (b) should not initiate conflict mediations that would involve the pregnant woman or couple as a conflict party. CONCLUSION: It seems to be vital that ethics consultants as well as health care professionals acknowledge the current limitations and pitfalls of ethics consultation in prenatal medicine and together engage in the advancement of standards for this particularly complex setting. BioMed Central 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8642991/ /pubmed/34861862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00730-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schmitz, Dagmar
Clarke, Angus
Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
title Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
title_full Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
title_fullStr Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
title_full_unstemmed Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
title_short Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
title_sort ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8642991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34861862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00730-3
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzdagmar ethicsexpertsandfetalpatientsaproposalformodesty
AT clarkeangus ethicsexpertsandfetalpatientsaproposalformodesty