Cargando…

The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to systematically review studies on health outcomes from smokeless tobacco (SLT) products. METHODS: We analysed published literature on the health outcomes from SLT use between 01/01/2015 to 01/02/2020, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajat, C., Stein, E., Ramstrom, L., Shantikumar, S., Polosa, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00557-6
_version_ 1784609792260571136
author Hajat, C.
Stein, E.
Ramstrom, L.
Shantikumar, S.
Polosa, R.
author_facet Hajat, C.
Stein, E.
Ramstrom, L.
Shantikumar, S.
Polosa, R.
author_sort Hajat, C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objective was to systematically review studies on health outcomes from smokeless tobacco (SLT) products. METHODS: We analysed published literature on the health outcomes from SLT use between 01/01/2015 to 01/02/2020, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Of 53 studies included, six were global, 32 from Asia, Middle East and Africa (AMEA), nine from USA and six from Europe. ‘Poor’-rated studies predominated (23;43%), in particular, for global (4;66%) and AMEA (16;50%). Health outcomes differed between SLT-products and regions; those in AMEA were associated with higher mortality (overall, cancer, Coronary heart disease (CHD), respiratory but not cardiovascular disease (CVD)), and morbidity (CVD, oral and head and neck cancers), with odds ratios up to 38.7. European studies showed no excess mortality (overall, CVD, from cancers) or morbidity (ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, oral, head and neck, pancreatic or colon cancers) from several meta-analyses; single studies reported elevated risk of rectal cancer and respiratory disorders. Pooled study data showed protection against developing Parkinson’s disease. US studies showed mixed results for mortality (raised overall, CHD, cancer and smoking-related cancer mortality; no excess risk of respiratory or CVD mortality). Morbidity outcomes were also mixed, with some evidence of increased IHD, stroke and cancer risk (oral, head and neck). No studies reported on switching from cigarettes to SLT-products. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates stark differences between different SLT-products in different regions, ranging from zero harm from European snus to greatly increased health risks in AMEA. The literature on the safety profile for SLT-products for harm reduction is incomplete and potentially misinforming policy and regulation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00557-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86430122021-12-06 The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review Hajat, C. Stein, E. Ramstrom, L. Shantikumar, S. Polosa, R. Harm Reduct J Review INTRODUCTION: The objective was to systematically review studies on health outcomes from smokeless tobacco (SLT) products. METHODS: We analysed published literature on the health outcomes from SLT use between 01/01/2015 to 01/02/2020, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Of 53 studies included, six were global, 32 from Asia, Middle East and Africa (AMEA), nine from USA and six from Europe. ‘Poor’-rated studies predominated (23;43%), in particular, for global (4;66%) and AMEA (16;50%). Health outcomes differed between SLT-products and regions; those in AMEA were associated with higher mortality (overall, cancer, Coronary heart disease (CHD), respiratory but not cardiovascular disease (CVD)), and morbidity (CVD, oral and head and neck cancers), with odds ratios up to 38.7. European studies showed no excess mortality (overall, CVD, from cancers) or morbidity (ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, oral, head and neck, pancreatic or colon cancers) from several meta-analyses; single studies reported elevated risk of rectal cancer and respiratory disorders. Pooled study data showed protection against developing Parkinson’s disease. US studies showed mixed results for mortality (raised overall, CHD, cancer and smoking-related cancer mortality; no excess risk of respiratory or CVD mortality). Morbidity outcomes were also mixed, with some evidence of increased IHD, stroke and cancer risk (oral, head and neck). No studies reported on switching from cigarettes to SLT-products. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates stark differences between different SLT-products in different regions, ranging from zero harm from European snus to greatly increased health risks in AMEA. The literature on the safety profile for SLT-products for harm reduction is incomplete and potentially misinforming policy and regulation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-021-00557-6. BioMed Central 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643012/ /pubmed/34863207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00557-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Hajat, C.
Stein, E.
Ramstrom, L.
Shantikumar, S.
Polosa, R.
The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
title The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
title_full The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
title_fullStr The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
title_short The health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
title_sort health impact of smokeless tobacco products: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00557-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hajatc thehealthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT steine thehealthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT ramstroml thehealthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT shantikumars thehealthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT polosar thehealthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT hajatc healthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT steine healthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT ramstroml healthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT shantikumars healthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview
AT polosar healthimpactofsmokelesstobaccoproductsasystematicreview