Cargando…
The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review
Since 1955, the only available H(1) antihistamines for intravenous administration have been first-generation formulations and, of those, only intravenously administered (IV) diphenhydramine is still approved in the USA. Orally administered cetirizine hydrochloride, a second-generation H(1) antihista...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01999-x |
_version_ | 1784609816326438912 |
---|---|
author | Blaiss, Michael S. Bernstein, Jonathan A. Kessler, Adam Pines, Jesse M. Camargo, Carlos A. Fulgham, Paula Haumschild, Ryan Rupp, Kristin Tyler, Timothy Moellman, Joseph |
author_facet | Blaiss, Michael S. Bernstein, Jonathan A. Kessler, Adam Pines, Jesse M. Camargo, Carlos A. Fulgham, Paula Haumschild, Ryan Rupp, Kristin Tyler, Timothy Moellman, Joseph |
author_sort | Blaiss, Michael S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since 1955, the only available H(1) antihistamines for intravenous administration have been first-generation formulations and, of those, only intravenously administered (IV) diphenhydramine is still approved in the USA. Orally administered cetirizine hydrochloride, a second-generation H(1) antihistamine, has been safely used over-the-counter for many years. In 2019, IV cetirizine was approved for the treatment of acute urticaria. In light of this approval, this narrative review discusses the changing landscape of IV antihistamines for the treatment of histamine-mediated conditions. Specifically, IV antihistamines will be discussed as a treatment option for acute urticaria and angioedema, as premedication to prevent infusion reactions related to anticancer agents and other biologics, and as an adjunct treatment for anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions. Before the development of IV cetirizine, randomized controlled trials of IV antihistamines for these indications were lacking. Three randomized controlled trials have been conducted with IV cetirizine versus IV diphenhydramine in the ambulatory care setting. A phase 3 trial of IV cetirizine 10 mg versus IV diphenhydramine 50 mg was conducted in 262 adults who presented to the urgent care/emergency department with acute urticaria requiring antihistamines. For the primary efficacy endpoint, defined as change from baseline in a 2-h patient-rated pruritus score, non-inferiority of IV cetirizine to IV diphenhydramine was demonstrated (score − 1.6 vs − 1.5, respectively; 95% CI − 0.1, 0.3). Compared with IV diphenhydramine, IV cetirizine demonstrated fewer adverse effects including less sedation, a significantly shorter length of stay in the treatment center, and fewer returns to the treatment center at 24 and 48 h. Similar findings were demonstrated in another phase 2 acute urticaria trial and in a phase 2 trial assessing IV cetirizine for pretreatment for infusion reactions in the oncology/immunology setting. IV cetirizine is associated with similar patient outcomes, fewer adverse effects, and increased treatment center efficiency than IV diphenhydramine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8643118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86431182021-12-06 The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review Blaiss, Michael S. Bernstein, Jonathan A. Kessler, Adam Pines, Jesse M. Camargo, Carlos A. Fulgham, Paula Haumschild, Ryan Rupp, Kristin Tyler, Timothy Moellman, Joseph Adv Ther Review Since 1955, the only available H(1) antihistamines for intravenous administration have been first-generation formulations and, of those, only intravenously administered (IV) diphenhydramine is still approved in the USA. Orally administered cetirizine hydrochloride, a second-generation H(1) antihistamine, has been safely used over-the-counter for many years. In 2019, IV cetirizine was approved for the treatment of acute urticaria. In light of this approval, this narrative review discusses the changing landscape of IV antihistamines for the treatment of histamine-mediated conditions. Specifically, IV antihistamines will be discussed as a treatment option for acute urticaria and angioedema, as premedication to prevent infusion reactions related to anticancer agents and other biologics, and as an adjunct treatment for anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions. Before the development of IV cetirizine, randomized controlled trials of IV antihistamines for these indications were lacking. Three randomized controlled trials have been conducted with IV cetirizine versus IV diphenhydramine in the ambulatory care setting. A phase 3 trial of IV cetirizine 10 mg versus IV diphenhydramine 50 mg was conducted in 262 adults who presented to the urgent care/emergency department with acute urticaria requiring antihistamines. For the primary efficacy endpoint, defined as change from baseline in a 2-h patient-rated pruritus score, non-inferiority of IV cetirizine to IV diphenhydramine was demonstrated (score − 1.6 vs − 1.5, respectively; 95% CI − 0.1, 0.3). Compared with IV diphenhydramine, IV cetirizine demonstrated fewer adverse effects including less sedation, a significantly shorter length of stay in the treatment center, and fewer returns to the treatment center at 24 and 48 h. Similar findings were demonstrated in another phase 2 acute urticaria trial and in a phase 2 trial assessing IV cetirizine for pretreatment for infusion reactions in the oncology/immunology setting. IV cetirizine is associated with similar patient outcomes, fewer adverse effects, and increased treatment center efficiency than IV diphenhydramine. Springer Healthcare 2021-12-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8643118/ /pubmed/34862952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01999-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Blaiss, Michael S. Bernstein, Jonathan A. Kessler, Adam Pines, Jesse M. Camargo, Carlos A. Fulgham, Paula Haumschild, Ryan Rupp, Kristin Tyler, Timothy Moellman, Joseph The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review |
title | The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review |
title_full | The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review |
title_short | The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review |
title_sort | role of cetirizine in the changing landscape of iv antihistamines: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01999-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blaissmichaels theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT bernsteinjonathana theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT kessleradam theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT pinesjessem theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT camargocarlosa theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT fulghampaula theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT haumschildryan theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT ruppkristin theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT tylertimothy theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT moellmanjoseph theroleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT blaissmichaels roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT bernsteinjonathana roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT kessleradam roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT pinesjessem roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT camargocarlosa roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT fulghampaula roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT haumschildryan roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT ruppkristin roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT tylertimothy roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview AT moellmanjoseph roleofcetirizineinthechanginglandscapeofivantihistaminesanarrativereview |