Cargando…

The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat

PURPOSE: To overcome the challenge of preoperative differentiation between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (RMFAML), we evaluated the potential of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in distinguishing RMFAML from ccRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (191)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jianhu, Bao, Jie, Zhang, Weijie, Li, Qiaoxing, Hou, Jianquan, Wei, Xuedong, Huang, Yuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876853
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S336920
_version_ 1784609819568635904
author Liu, Jianhu
Bao, Jie
Zhang, Weijie
Li, Qiaoxing
Hou, Jianquan
Wei, Xuedong
Huang, Yuhua
author_facet Liu, Jianhu
Bao, Jie
Zhang, Weijie
Li, Qiaoxing
Hou, Jianquan
Wei, Xuedong
Huang, Yuhua
author_sort Liu, Jianhu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To overcome the challenge of preoperative differentiation between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (RMFAML), we evaluated the potential of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in distinguishing RMFAML from ccRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (191) were divided into ccRCC and RMFAML groups according to postoperative pathology. Umbilical horizontal computed tomography (CT) images were used for visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and total fat area (TFA) measurements. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for ccRCC. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) were compared to identify the most valuable indicator for identifying ccRCC and RMFAML. RESULTS: In total, 166 patients had ccRCC, and 25 had RMFAML. ccRCC and RMFAML patients showed significant differences in age (P<0.001), sex (P<0.001), hypertension (P=0.027), BMI (P<0.001), SFA (P=0.046), VFA (P<0.001) and TFA (P<0.001). According to multiple logistic regression analysis, male sex [4.311 (1.469~12.653), p=0.008]; older age [1.047 (1.008~1.088), p=0.017]; and higher BMI [1.305 (1.088~1.566), p=0.004], SFA [1.013 (1.003~1.023), p=0.008], VFA [1.026 (1.012~1.041), p<0.001] and TFA [1.011 (1.005~1.017), p=0.001] were associated with ccRCC. The AUCs of sex (male), age, BMI, TFA, VFA, and SFA were 0.726, 0.687, 0.783, 0.769, 0.840, and 0.645, respectively. The VFA cut-off value was 69.99 cm(2). The sensitivity and specificity of higher VFA (≥69.99 cm(2)) for ccRCC diagnosis were 79.52% and 80.00%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In differentiating ccRCC from RMFAML, male sex, older age, and higher BMI, TFA, SFA, and VFA are risk factors for ccRCC. VFA is the most effective indicator for identifying ccRCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86431372021-12-06 The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat Liu, Jianhu Bao, Jie Zhang, Weijie Li, Qiaoxing Hou, Jianquan Wei, Xuedong Huang, Yuhua Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: To overcome the challenge of preoperative differentiation between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (RMFAML), we evaluated the potential of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in distinguishing RMFAML from ccRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (191) were divided into ccRCC and RMFAML groups according to postoperative pathology. Umbilical horizontal computed tomography (CT) images were used for visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and total fat area (TFA) measurements. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for ccRCC. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) were compared to identify the most valuable indicator for identifying ccRCC and RMFAML. RESULTS: In total, 166 patients had ccRCC, and 25 had RMFAML. ccRCC and RMFAML patients showed significant differences in age (P<0.001), sex (P<0.001), hypertension (P=0.027), BMI (P<0.001), SFA (P=0.046), VFA (P<0.001) and TFA (P<0.001). According to multiple logistic regression analysis, male sex [4.311 (1.469~12.653), p=0.008]; older age [1.047 (1.008~1.088), p=0.017]; and higher BMI [1.305 (1.088~1.566), p=0.004], SFA [1.013 (1.003~1.023), p=0.008], VFA [1.026 (1.012~1.041), p<0.001] and TFA [1.011 (1.005~1.017), p=0.001] were associated with ccRCC. The AUCs of sex (male), age, BMI, TFA, VFA, and SFA were 0.726, 0.687, 0.783, 0.769, 0.840, and 0.645, respectively. The VFA cut-off value was 69.99 cm(2). The sensitivity and specificity of higher VFA (≥69.99 cm(2)) for ccRCC diagnosis were 79.52% and 80.00%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In differentiating ccRCC from RMFAML, male sex, older age, and higher BMI, TFA, SFA, and VFA are risk factors for ccRCC. VFA is the most effective indicator for identifying ccRCC. Dove 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8643137/ /pubmed/34876853 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S336920 Text en © 2021 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Liu, Jianhu
Bao, Jie
Zhang, Weijie
Li, Qiaoxing
Hou, Jianquan
Wei, Xuedong
Huang, Yuhua
The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat
title The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat
title_full The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat
title_fullStr The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat
title_full_unstemmed The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat
title_short The Potential of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat
title_sort potential of visceral adipose tissue in distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876853
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S336920
work_keys_str_mv AT liujianhu thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT baojie thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT zhangweijie thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT liqiaoxing thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT houjianquan thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT weixuedong thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT huangyuhua thepotentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT liujianhu potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT baojie potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT zhangweijie potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT liqiaoxing potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT houjianquan potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT weixuedong potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat
AT huangyuhua potentialofvisceraladiposetissueindistinguishingclearcellrenalcellcarcinomafromrenalangiomyolipomawithminimalfat