Cargando…

Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo

Although neurocircuits can be activated by focused ultrasound stimulation, it is unclear whether this is also true for spinal cord neurocircuits. In this study, we used low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to stimulate lumbar 4–lumbar 5 (L4–L5) segments of the spinal cord of normal Sprague Dawley...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Ye-Hui, Chen, Mo-Xian, Chen, Shao-Chun, Luo, Kai-Xuan, Wang, Bin, Liu, Yao, Ao, Li-Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8534466
_version_ 1784609844040302592
author Liao, Ye-Hui
Chen, Mo-Xian
Chen, Shao-Chun
Luo, Kai-Xuan
Wang, Bin
Liu, Yao
Ao, Li-Juan
author_facet Liao, Ye-Hui
Chen, Mo-Xian
Chen, Shao-Chun
Luo, Kai-Xuan
Wang, Bin
Liu, Yao
Ao, Li-Juan
author_sort Liao, Ye-Hui
collection PubMed
description Although neurocircuits can be activated by focused ultrasound stimulation, it is unclear whether this is also true for spinal cord neurocircuits. In this study, we used low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to stimulate lumbar 4–lumbar 5 (L4–L5) segments of the spinal cord of normal Sprague Dawley rats with a clapper. The activation of the spinal cord neurocircuits enhanced soleus muscle contraction as measured by electromyography (EMG). Neuronal activation and injury were assessed by EMG, western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Nissl staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunohistochemistry (IHC), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and the Basso–Beattie–Bresnahan locomotor rating scale. When the LIFU intensity was more than 0.5 MPa, LIFU stimulation induced soleus muscle contraction and increased the EMG amplitudes (P < 0.05) and the number of c-fos- and GAD65-positive cells (P < 0.05). When the LIFU intensity was 3.0 MPa, the LIFU stimulation led to spinal cord damage and decreased SEP amplitudes for electrophysiological assessment (P < 0.05); this resulted in coagulation necrosis, structural destruction, neuronal loss in the dorsal horn by H&E and Nissl staining, and increased expression of GFAP, IL-1β, TNF-α, and caspase-3 by IHC, ELISA, and WB (P < 0.05). These results show that LIFU can activate spinal cord neurocircuits and that LIFU stimulation with an irradiation intensity ≤1.5 MPa is a safe neurostimulation method for the spinal cord.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86432432021-12-05 Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo Liao, Ye-Hui Chen, Mo-Xian Chen, Shao-Chun Luo, Kai-Xuan Wang, Bin Liu, Yao Ao, Li-Juan Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Although neurocircuits can be activated by focused ultrasound stimulation, it is unclear whether this is also true for spinal cord neurocircuits. In this study, we used low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to stimulate lumbar 4–lumbar 5 (L4–L5) segments of the spinal cord of normal Sprague Dawley rats with a clapper. The activation of the spinal cord neurocircuits enhanced soleus muscle contraction as measured by electromyography (EMG). Neuronal activation and injury were assessed by EMG, western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Nissl staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunohistochemistry (IHC), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and the Basso–Beattie–Bresnahan locomotor rating scale. When the LIFU intensity was more than 0.5 MPa, LIFU stimulation induced soleus muscle contraction and increased the EMG amplitudes (P < 0.05) and the number of c-fos- and GAD65-positive cells (P < 0.05). When the LIFU intensity was 3.0 MPa, the LIFU stimulation led to spinal cord damage and decreased SEP amplitudes for electrophysiological assessment (P < 0.05); this resulted in coagulation necrosis, structural destruction, neuronal loss in the dorsal horn by H&E and Nissl staining, and increased expression of GFAP, IL-1β, TNF-α, and caspase-3 by IHC, ELISA, and WB (P < 0.05). These results show that LIFU can activate spinal cord neurocircuits and that LIFU stimulation with an irradiation intensity ≤1.5 MPa is a safe neurostimulation method for the spinal cord. Hindawi 2021-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8643243/ /pubmed/34873411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8534466 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ye-Hui Liao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liao, Ye-Hui
Chen, Mo-Xian
Chen, Shao-Chun
Luo, Kai-Xuan
Wang, Bin
Liu, Yao
Ao, Li-Juan
Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo
title Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo
title_full Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo
title_fullStr Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo
title_short Effects of Noninvasive Low-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Spinal Cord Neurocircuits In Vivo
title_sort effects of noninvasive low-intensity focus ultrasound neuromodulation on spinal cord neurocircuits in vivo
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8534466
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoyehui effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo
AT chenmoxian effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo
AT chenshaochun effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo
AT luokaixuan effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo
AT wangbin effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo
AT liuyao effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo
AT aolijuan effectsofnoninvasivelowintensityfocusultrasoundneuromodulationonspinalcordneurocircuitsinvivo