Cargando…

Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory

Some of those theorists who believe tort law consists of relational wrongs also believe, under the influence of Kant’s legal philosophy, that tort law is concerned for the agency of the two parties to a wrongful interaction. I argue that these theorists should discard their agency framework. It dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sage, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab009
_version_ 1784609889524383744
author Sage, Nick
author_facet Sage, Nick
author_sort Sage, Nick
collection PubMed
description Some of those theorists who believe tort law consists of relational wrongs also believe, under the influence of Kant’s legal philosophy, that tort law is concerned for the agency of the two parties to a wrongful interaction. I argue that these theorists should discard their agency framework. It distorts our view of tort doctrine and does not really fit the law’s relational structure. We can reach a better understanding just by pursuing the idea that torts are relational wrongs. I try to diagnose and suggest cures for the intellectual tendencies that lead Kantian theorists away from this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86435872021-12-06 Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory Sage, Nick Oxf J Leg Stud Articles Some of those theorists who believe tort law consists of relational wrongs also believe, under the influence of Kant’s legal philosophy, that tort law is concerned for the agency of the two parties to a wrongful interaction. I argue that these theorists should discard their agency framework. It distorts our view of tort doctrine and does not really fit the law’s relational structure. We can reach a better understanding just by pursuing the idea that torts are relational wrongs. I try to diagnose and suggest cures for the intellectual tendencies that lead Kantian theorists away from this approach. Oxford University Press 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8643587/ /pubmed/34876879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab009 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Sage, Nick
Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
title Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
title_full Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
title_fullStr Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
title_full_unstemmed Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
title_short Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
title_sort relational wrongs and agency in tort theory
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab009
work_keys_str_mv AT sagenick relationalwrongsandagencyintorttheory