Cargando…
Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory
Some of those theorists who believe tort law consists of relational wrongs also believe, under the influence of Kant’s legal philosophy, that tort law is concerned for the agency of the two parties to a wrongful interaction. I argue that these theorists should discard their agency framework. It dist...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab009 |
_version_ | 1784609889524383744 |
---|---|
author | Sage, Nick |
author_facet | Sage, Nick |
author_sort | Sage, Nick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some of those theorists who believe tort law consists of relational wrongs also believe, under the influence of Kant’s legal philosophy, that tort law is concerned for the agency of the two parties to a wrongful interaction. I argue that these theorists should discard their agency framework. It distorts our view of tort doctrine and does not really fit the law’s relational structure. We can reach a better understanding just by pursuing the idea that torts are relational wrongs. I try to diagnose and suggest cures for the intellectual tendencies that lead Kantian theorists away from this approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8643587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86435872021-12-06 Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory Sage, Nick Oxf J Leg Stud Articles Some of those theorists who believe tort law consists of relational wrongs also believe, under the influence of Kant’s legal philosophy, that tort law is concerned for the agency of the two parties to a wrongful interaction. I argue that these theorists should discard their agency framework. It distorts our view of tort doctrine and does not really fit the law’s relational structure. We can reach a better understanding just by pursuing the idea that torts are relational wrongs. I try to diagnose and suggest cures for the intellectual tendencies that lead Kantian theorists away from this approach. Oxford University Press 2021-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8643587/ /pubmed/34876879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab009 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles Sage, Nick Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory |
title | Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory |
title_full | Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory |
title_fullStr | Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory |
title_short | Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory |
title_sort | relational wrongs and agency in tort theory |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagenick relationalwrongsandagencyintorttheory |