Cargando…
191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are traditionally treated with intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy, which may increase length of stay and healthcare costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if oral antibiotic step-down therapy for non-staphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.393 |
_version_ | 1784609947564113920 |
---|---|
author | Gandhi, Kelvin Wrzesinski, Magdalena Bunnell, Kristen Long, Ashley Hutzley, Vanessa Hamilton, Rachel Sundsbak, John Gibble, Allison |
author_facet | Gandhi, Kelvin Wrzesinski, Magdalena Bunnell, Kristen Long, Ashley Hutzley, Vanessa Hamilton, Rachel Sundsbak, John Gibble, Allison |
author_sort | Gandhi, Kelvin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are traditionally treated with intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy, which may increase length of stay and healthcare costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if oral antibiotic step-down therapy for non-staphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections (GP-BSIs) is non-inferior to IV antibiotics. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with a non-Staphylococcus aureus, non-Staphylococcus lugdunensis GP-BSI from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients were excluded if they fit any of the following criteria: organism identified as contaminant, polymicrobial BSI, recurrent BSI within the past 90 days, or receipt of an effective antibiotic for a duration longer than what is indicated for BSI treatment. Patients were categorized into those who received an IV antibiotic for the total duration of therapy and those who received an oral step-down antibiotic for at least one-third of the treatment course. The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 90-day clinical failure consisting of 90-day all-cause mortality, change in therapy due to inadequate clinical response, and 90-day BSI recurrence. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary composite outcome, line-related complications, and hospital length of stay. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess for predictors of 90-day clinical failure. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included (oral group, n=94; IV group, n=214). Pitt Bacteremia Scores were low overall, but higher in the IV group (0 vs 1, p=0.045). The oral group had a higher proportion of GP-BSI caused by streptococcal species (76% vs 61%, p< 0.001). The oral group had a lower incidence of 90-day clinical failure and was found to be noninferior to the IV group (9% vs 14%; mean difference -5%, 90% CI -12.7 to 2.6). The IV group had a longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 6 days, p< 0.001), however there were no other significant differences in secondary outcomes. Bivariate analysis found no significant predictors of 90-day clinical failure. CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic step-down therapy was found to be non-inferior to IV antibiotic therapy, and thus may be an alternative option for the treatment of non-staphylococcal GP-BSIs. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8643845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86438452021-12-06 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections Gandhi, Kelvin Wrzesinski, Magdalena Bunnell, Kristen Long, Ashley Hutzley, Vanessa Hamilton, Rachel Sundsbak, John Gibble, Allison Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are traditionally treated with intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy, which may increase length of stay and healthcare costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if oral antibiotic step-down therapy for non-staphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections (GP-BSIs) is non-inferior to IV antibiotics. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with a non-Staphylococcus aureus, non-Staphylococcus lugdunensis GP-BSI from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients were excluded if they fit any of the following criteria: organism identified as contaminant, polymicrobial BSI, recurrent BSI within the past 90 days, or receipt of an effective antibiotic for a duration longer than what is indicated for BSI treatment. Patients were categorized into those who received an IV antibiotic for the total duration of therapy and those who received an oral step-down antibiotic for at least one-third of the treatment course. The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 90-day clinical failure consisting of 90-day all-cause mortality, change in therapy due to inadequate clinical response, and 90-day BSI recurrence. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary composite outcome, line-related complications, and hospital length of stay. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess for predictors of 90-day clinical failure. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included (oral group, n=94; IV group, n=214). Pitt Bacteremia Scores were low overall, but higher in the IV group (0 vs 1, p=0.045). The oral group had a higher proportion of GP-BSI caused by streptococcal species (76% vs 61%, p< 0.001). The oral group had a lower incidence of 90-day clinical failure and was found to be noninferior to the IV group (9% vs 14%; mean difference -5%, 90% CI -12.7 to 2.6). The IV group had a longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 6 days, p< 0.001), however there were no other significant differences in secondary outcomes. Bivariate analysis found no significant predictors of 90-day clinical failure. CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic step-down therapy was found to be non-inferior to IV antibiotic therapy, and thus may be an alternative option for the treatment of non-staphylococcal GP-BSIs. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.393 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Gandhi, Kelvin Wrzesinski, Magdalena Bunnell, Kristen Long, Ashley Hutzley, Vanessa Hamilton, Rachel Sundsbak, John Gibble, Allison 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections |
title | 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections |
title_full | 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections |
title_fullStr | 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections |
title_short | 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections |
title_sort | 191. oral antibiotic step-down therapy for non-staphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.393 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandhikelvin 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT wrzesinskimagdalena 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT bunnellkristen 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT longashley 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT hutzleyvanessa 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT hamiltonrachel 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT sundsbakjohn 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections AT gibbleallison 191oralantibioticstepdowntherapyfornonstaphylococcalgrampositivebloodstreaminfections |