Cargando…
652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the accuracy of Quantiferon ®- TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB). METHODS: From April 2020 to May 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed ATB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.849 |
_version_ | 1784609951219449856 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lifan yang, zhengrong Liu, Xiaoqing Ma, Huimin Ge, Qiping Zhang, Yueqiu Shi, Xiaochun Cao, Qifei Gao, Mengqiu |
author_facet | Zhang, Lifan yang, zhengrong Liu, Xiaoqing Ma, Huimin Ge, Qiping Zhang, Yueqiu Shi, Xiaochun Cao, Qifei Gao, Mengqiu |
author_sort | Zhang, Lifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the accuracy of Quantiferon ®- TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB). METHODS: From April 2020 to May 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed ATB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Beijing Chest Hospital were enrolled as case group, while patients excluded from ATB in the same period were enrolled as control group, The clinical and laboratory information were collected. QFT-Plus and T-SPOT. TB were tested simultaneously to evaluate the consistency of the results and compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for diagnosing ATB. RESULTS: Fifty-seven ATB patients and 159 non-ATB patients were included. 33 (57.9%) ATB patients were pathologically confirmed. The proportions of indeterminate results in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.7% vs 0%, respectively. The agreement between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial (kappa=0.644, p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.759 (95%CI 0.689-0.829) vs 0.810 (95%CI 0.742-0.877), respectively, and there was no significant difference (p=0.303). the sensitivity of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 85.2% vs 89.5%, while the specificity was 61.7% vs 52.2%, respectively. In 33 Patients with pathologically confirmed ATB, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.9% vs 93.9% (p=0.669), respectively. In 78 patients (36.1%) who received glucocorticoid / immunosuppressive / biological agents, the positive rate of QFT-Plus was 35.9% (28/78), which was significantly lower than that of those who did not receive these agents (77 / 138pm,55.8%) (p=0.005), but there was no significant difference in the positive rate of T-SPOT.TB between the two groups (52.6% vs. 62.3%, p=0.162). The positive rate for both tests was independent of the peripheral blood lymphocyte count (p=0.675 for QFT-Plus vs. P=0.138 for T-SPOT.TB). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of ATB. QFT-plus might be prone to indeterminate results and influenced by the immunosuppressive status. The results need to be verified by a prospective cohort study with large sample. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8643860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86438602021-12-06 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis Zhang, Lifan yang, zhengrong Liu, Xiaoqing Ma, Huimin Ge, Qiping Zhang, Yueqiu Shi, Xiaochun Cao, Qifei Gao, Mengqiu Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the accuracy of Quantiferon ®- TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB). METHODS: From April 2020 to May 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed ATB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Beijing Chest Hospital were enrolled as case group, while patients excluded from ATB in the same period were enrolled as control group, The clinical and laboratory information were collected. QFT-Plus and T-SPOT. TB were tested simultaneously to evaluate the consistency of the results and compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for diagnosing ATB. RESULTS: Fifty-seven ATB patients and 159 non-ATB patients were included. 33 (57.9%) ATB patients were pathologically confirmed. The proportions of indeterminate results in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.7% vs 0%, respectively. The agreement between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial (kappa=0.644, p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.759 (95%CI 0.689-0.829) vs 0.810 (95%CI 0.742-0.877), respectively, and there was no significant difference (p=0.303). the sensitivity of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 85.2% vs 89.5%, while the specificity was 61.7% vs 52.2%, respectively. In 33 Patients with pathologically confirmed ATB, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.9% vs 93.9% (p=0.669), respectively. In 78 patients (36.1%) who received glucocorticoid / immunosuppressive / biological agents, the positive rate of QFT-Plus was 35.9% (28/78), which was significantly lower than that of those who did not receive these agents (77 / 138pm,55.8%) (p=0.005), but there was no significant difference in the positive rate of T-SPOT.TB between the two groups (52.6% vs. 62.3%, p=0.162). The positive rate for both tests was independent of the peripheral blood lymphocyte count (p=0.675 for QFT-Plus vs. P=0.138 for T-SPOT.TB). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of ATB. QFT-plus might be prone to indeterminate results and influenced by the immunosuppressive status. The results need to be verified by a prospective cohort study with large sample. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.849 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Zhang, Lifan yang, zhengrong Liu, Xiaoqing Ma, Huimin Ge, Qiping Zhang, Yueqiu Shi, Xiaochun Cao, Qifei Gao, Mengqiu 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis |
title | 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis |
title_full | 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis |
title_fullStr | 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis |
title_full_unstemmed | 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis |
title_short | 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis |
title_sort | 652. comparison of quantiferon-tb gold plus and t-spot.tb in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglifan 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT yangzhengrong 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT liuxiaoqing 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT mahuimin 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT geqiping 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT zhangyueqiu 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT shixiaochun 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT caoqifei 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis AT gaomengqiu 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis |