Cargando…

652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the accuracy of Quantiferon ®- TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB). METHODS: From April 2020 to May 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed ATB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lifan, yang, zhengrong, Liu, Xiaoqing, Ma, Huimin, Ge, Qiping, Zhang, Yueqiu, Shi, Xiaochun, Cao, Qifei, Gao, Mengqiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.849
_version_ 1784609951219449856
author Zhang, Lifan
yang, zhengrong
Liu, Xiaoqing
Ma, Huimin
Ge, Qiping
Zhang, Yueqiu
Shi, Xiaochun
Cao, Qifei
Gao, Mengqiu
author_facet Zhang, Lifan
yang, zhengrong
Liu, Xiaoqing
Ma, Huimin
Ge, Qiping
Zhang, Yueqiu
Shi, Xiaochun
Cao, Qifei
Gao, Mengqiu
author_sort Zhang, Lifan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the accuracy of Quantiferon ®- TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB). METHODS: From April 2020 to May 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed ATB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Beijing Chest Hospital were enrolled as case group, while patients excluded from ATB in the same period were enrolled as control group, The clinical and laboratory information were collected. QFT-Plus and T-SPOT. TB were tested simultaneously to evaluate the consistency of the results and compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for diagnosing ATB. RESULTS: Fifty-seven ATB patients and 159 non-ATB patients were included. 33 (57.9%) ATB patients were pathologically confirmed. The proportions of indeterminate results in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.7% vs 0%, respectively. The agreement between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial (kappa=0.644, p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.759 (95%CI 0.689-0.829) vs 0.810 (95%CI 0.742-0.877), respectively, and there was no significant difference (p=0.303). the sensitivity of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 85.2% vs 89.5%, while the specificity was 61.7% vs 52.2%, respectively. In 33 Patients with pathologically confirmed ATB, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.9% vs 93.9% (p=0.669), respectively. In 78 patients (36.1%) who received glucocorticoid / immunosuppressive / biological agents, the positive rate of QFT-Plus was 35.9% (28/78), which was significantly lower than that of those who did not receive these agents (77 / 138pm,55.8%) (p=0.005), but there was no significant difference in the positive rate of T-SPOT.TB between the two groups (52.6% vs. 62.3%, p=0.162). The positive rate for both tests was independent of the peripheral blood lymphocyte count (p=0.675 for QFT-Plus vs. P=0.138 for T-SPOT.TB). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of ATB. QFT-plus might be prone to indeterminate results and influenced by the immunosuppressive status. The results need to be verified by a prospective cohort study with large sample. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86438602021-12-06 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis Zhang, Lifan yang, zhengrong Liu, Xiaoqing Ma, Huimin Ge, Qiping Zhang, Yueqiu Shi, Xiaochun Cao, Qifei Gao, Mengqiu Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the accuracy of Quantiferon ®- TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB). METHODS: From April 2020 to May 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed ATB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Beijing Chest Hospital were enrolled as case group, while patients excluded from ATB in the same period were enrolled as control group, The clinical and laboratory information were collected. QFT-Plus and T-SPOT. TB were tested simultaneously to evaluate the consistency of the results and compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for diagnosing ATB. RESULTS: Fifty-seven ATB patients and 159 non-ATB patients were included. 33 (57.9%) ATB patients were pathologically confirmed. The proportions of indeterminate results in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.7% vs 0%, respectively. The agreement between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial (kappa=0.644, p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.759 (95%CI 0.689-0.829) vs 0.810 (95%CI 0.742-0.877), respectively, and there was no significant difference (p=0.303). the sensitivity of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 85.2% vs 89.5%, while the specificity was 61.7% vs 52.2%, respectively. In 33 Patients with pathologically confirmed ATB, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.9% vs 93.9% (p=0.669), respectively. In 78 patients (36.1%) who received glucocorticoid / immunosuppressive / biological agents, the positive rate of QFT-Plus was 35.9% (28/78), which was significantly lower than that of those who did not receive these agents (77 / 138pm,55.8%) (p=0.005), but there was no significant difference in the positive rate of T-SPOT.TB between the two groups (52.6% vs. 62.3%, p=0.162). The positive rate for both tests was independent of the peripheral blood lymphocyte count (p=0.675 for QFT-Plus vs. P=0.138 for T-SPOT.TB). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of ATB. QFT-plus might be prone to indeterminate results and influenced by the immunosuppressive status. The results need to be verified by a prospective cohort study with large sample. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.849 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Zhang, Lifan
yang, zhengrong
Liu, Xiaoqing
Ma, Huimin
Ge, Qiping
Zhang, Yueqiu
Shi, Xiaochun
Cao, Qifei
Gao, Mengqiu
652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
title 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
title_full 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
title_fullStr 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
title_short 652. Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
title_sort 652. comparison of quantiferon-tb gold plus and t-spot.tb in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.849
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglifan 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT yangzhengrong 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT liuxiaoqing 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT mahuimin 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT geqiping 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT zhangyueqiu 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT shixiaochun 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT caoqifei 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis
AT gaomengqiu 652comparisonofquantiferontbgoldplusandtspottbinthediagnosisofactivetuberculosis