Cargando…

17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is to administer the influenza vaccine (InfV) annually. While in immunocompetent patients, the influenza vaccine is associated with significant benefit in morbidity and mortality, the inherent immunodeficiency from MM and it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Taylor D, Leffert, Jacob, Crescencio, Juan Carlos Rico, Jenkins, Mitchell, Burgess, Mary J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643918/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.219
_version_ 1784609965031292928
author Wilson, Taylor D
Leffert, Jacob
Crescencio, Juan Carlos Rico
Jenkins, Mitchell
Burgess, Mary J
author_facet Wilson, Taylor D
Leffert, Jacob
Crescencio, Juan Carlos Rico
Jenkins, Mitchell
Burgess, Mary J
author_sort Wilson, Taylor D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is to administer the influenza vaccine (InfV) annually. While in immunocompetent patients, the influenza vaccine is associated with significant benefit in morbidity and mortality, the inherent immunodeficiency from MM and its treatments reduce the InfV efficacy but it is thought to have some benefit. The effect on morbidity and mortality in MM patients has not been evaluated. Our study aims to investigate whether InfV vaccination status affects outcomes of MM patients diagnosed with Influenza A or B (FluA, FluB). METHODS: This was a retrospective study, using Arkansas Clinical Data Repository, which identified all MM patients diagnosed with FluA or FluB during five consecutive flu seasons from September 1(st) to April 30(th), 2015-2020. Those with hospital-acquired influenza were excluded. The outcome data were collected for 30 days following the initial diagnosis. Fisher Exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and Mann Whitney U test to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: We identified 194 MM patients diagnosed with FluA or FluB. Sixty-five (34%) were vaccinated and 129 (66%) were not vaccinated. A total of 87 (45%) were admitted to the hospital. Twenty-five (38%) of the vaccinated vs. 62 (48%) of the unvaccinated group were hospitalized (p=0.22), and 4/65 vaccinated vs. 12/129 unvaccinated required ICU treatment (p=0.59). Two patients in the vaccinated and 3 in the non-vaccinated group were intubated (p=1). The mean length of stay (LOS) for the vaccinated and unvaccinated was 10 days and 14 days, respectively, which was not significantly different (p=0.197). Two (3%) patients died within 30 days of diagnosis in the vaccinated group while four (3%) died in the unvaccinated group (p=1). CONCLUSION: The InfV status of MM patients had no effect on outcomes including the need for hospital admission, ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, LOS, and death. Hospitalization was common, but severe illness requiring ICU care and intubation were less common. Six patients died within 30 days of influenza diagnosis. Vaccination strategy, including high-dose and repeat doses, should be examined in MM patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86439182021-12-06 17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Wilson, Taylor D Leffert, Jacob Crescencio, Juan Carlos Rico Jenkins, Mitchell Burgess, Mary J Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is to administer the influenza vaccine (InfV) annually. While in immunocompetent patients, the influenza vaccine is associated with significant benefit in morbidity and mortality, the inherent immunodeficiency from MM and its treatments reduce the InfV efficacy but it is thought to have some benefit. The effect on morbidity and mortality in MM patients has not been evaluated. Our study aims to investigate whether InfV vaccination status affects outcomes of MM patients diagnosed with Influenza A or B (FluA, FluB). METHODS: This was a retrospective study, using Arkansas Clinical Data Repository, which identified all MM patients diagnosed with FluA or FluB during five consecutive flu seasons from September 1(st) to April 30(th), 2015-2020. Those with hospital-acquired influenza were excluded. The outcome data were collected for 30 days following the initial diagnosis. Fisher Exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and Mann Whitney U test to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: We identified 194 MM patients diagnosed with FluA or FluB. Sixty-five (34%) were vaccinated and 129 (66%) were not vaccinated. A total of 87 (45%) were admitted to the hospital. Twenty-five (38%) of the vaccinated vs. 62 (48%) of the unvaccinated group were hospitalized (p=0.22), and 4/65 vaccinated vs. 12/129 unvaccinated required ICU treatment (p=0.59). Two patients in the vaccinated and 3 in the non-vaccinated group were intubated (p=1). The mean length of stay (LOS) for the vaccinated and unvaccinated was 10 days and 14 days, respectively, which was not significantly different (p=0.197). Two (3%) patients died within 30 days of diagnosis in the vaccinated group while four (3%) died in the unvaccinated group (p=1). CONCLUSION: The InfV status of MM patients had no effect on outcomes including the need for hospital admission, ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, LOS, and death. Hospitalization was common, but severe illness requiring ICU care and intubation were less common. Six patients died within 30 days of influenza diagnosis. Vaccination strategy, including high-dose and repeat doses, should be examined in MM patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643918/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.219 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Wilson, Taylor D
Leffert, Jacob
Crescencio, Juan Carlos Rico
Jenkins, Mitchell
Burgess, Mary J
17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
title 17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
title_full 17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
title_fullStr 17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
title_full_unstemmed 17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
title_short 17. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Influenza Infected Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
title_sort 17. a retrospective cohort study of influenza infected multiple myeloma patients comparing clinical outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643918/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.219
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsontaylord 17aretrospectivecohortstudyofinfluenzainfectedmultiplemyelomapatientscomparingclinicaloutcomesbetweenvaccinatedandunvaccinated
AT leffertjacob 17aretrospectivecohortstudyofinfluenzainfectedmultiplemyelomapatientscomparingclinicaloutcomesbetweenvaccinatedandunvaccinated
AT crescenciojuancarlosrico 17aretrospectivecohortstudyofinfluenzainfectedmultiplemyelomapatientscomparingclinicaloutcomesbetweenvaccinatedandunvaccinated
AT jenkinsmitchell 17aretrospectivecohortstudyofinfluenzainfectedmultiplemyelomapatientscomparingclinicaloutcomesbetweenvaccinatedandunvaccinated
AT burgessmaryj 17aretrospectivecohortstudyofinfluenzainfectedmultiplemyelomapatientscomparingclinicaloutcomesbetweenvaccinatedandunvaccinated