Cargando…

144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial use is a cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship, though antifungal (AF) use is less frequently characterized. AFs are a major driver of inpatient costs and their use both reflects and drives changes in fungal susceptibility patterns. We report on trends in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaip, Emily A, Shippey, Ernie, MacDougall, Conan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643949/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.346
_version_ 1784609972384956416
author Kaip, Emily A
Shippey, Ernie
MacDougall, Conan
author_facet Kaip, Emily A
Shippey, Ernie
MacDougall, Conan
author_sort Kaip, Emily A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial use is a cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship, though antifungal (AF) use is less frequently characterized. AFs are a major driver of inpatient costs and their use both reflects and drives changes in fungal susceptibility patterns. We report on trends in AF use in a large sample of United States hospitals over time including predictors of AF use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult inpatient visits between 2016 and 2020 at hospitals contributing data to the Vizient Clinical Database/Clinical Resource Manager (www.vizientinc.com). Inpatient use of systemically administered AFs was investigated as a function of study quarter, diagnosis code, and underlying immunosuppressive condition. Changes in AF use were modeled using logistic and negative binomial regression. RESULTS: We examined over 23 million admissions across 470 hospitals, 43% of which were classified as teaching hospitals and 54% of which performed solid organ transplants. During the study period, 4.03% (951,284/23,565,493) of admissions were billed for one or more of the study AFs. Among admissions receiving AFs, 86% received an azole, with the most frequently used agent being fluconazole, which accounted for for 46% of total AF days. Likelihood of AF receipt during admission increased by quarter (OR 1.012, p< 0.001), controlling for length of stay, presence of fungal infection, hematologic malignancy (HM), or solid organ transplant (SOT). Odds of any receipt and days of therapy (DOT) of fluconazole, isavuconazole, posaconazole, and echinocandins increased over the study period while those of voriconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine decreased; odds of receipt of amphotericin products increased while DOT decreased; flucytosine receipt odds increased while DOT did not change. Only 30% of admissions with AF use were associated with a documented fungal infection, with 93% of these episodes documented as candidiasis. Admissions associated with SOT or HM represented 2% and 3% of all patient-days, but 11% and 25% of total AF days, respectively. Antifungal Utilization [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: AF use increased significantly over the study period, with changes across agents and classes. Most AF use occurred in the absence of administratively documented infection and was more common among SOT and HM patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86439492021-12-06 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020 Kaip, Emily A Shippey, Ernie MacDougall, Conan Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial use is a cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship, though antifungal (AF) use is less frequently characterized. AFs are a major driver of inpatient costs and their use both reflects and drives changes in fungal susceptibility patterns. We report on trends in AF use in a large sample of United States hospitals over time including predictors of AF use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult inpatient visits between 2016 and 2020 at hospitals contributing data to the Vizient Clinical Database/Clinical Resource Manager (www.vizientinc.com). Inpatient use of systemically administered AFs was investigated as a function of study quarter, diagnosis code, and underlying immunosuppressive condition. Changes in AF use were modeled using logistic and negative binomial regression. RESULTS: We examined over 23 million admissions across 470 hospitals, 43% of which were classified as teaching hospitals and 54% of which performed solid organ transplants. During the study period, 4.03% (951,284/23,565,493) of admissions were billed for one or more of the study AFs. Among admissions receiving AFs, 86% received an azole, with the most frequently used agent being fluconazole, which accounted for for 46% of total AF days. Likelihood of AF receipt during admission increased by quarter (OR 1.012, p< 0.001), controlling for length of stay, presence of fungal infection, hematologic malignancy (HM), or solid organ transplant (SOT). Odds of any receipt and days of therapy (DOT) of fluconazole, isavuconazole, posaconazole, and echinocandins increased over the study period while those of voriconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine decreased; odds of receipt of amphotericin products increased while DOT decreased; flucytosine receipt odds increased while DOT did not change. Only 30% of admissions with AF use were associated with a documented fungal infection, with 93% of these episodes documented as candidiasis. Admissions associated with SOT or HM represented 2% and 3% of all patient-days, but 11% and 25% of total AF days, respectively. Antifungal Utilization [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: AF use increased significantly over the study period, with changes across agents and classes. Most AF use occurred in the absence of administratively documented infection and was more common among SOT and HM patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643949/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.346 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Kaip, Emily A
Shippey, Ernie
MacDougall, Conan
144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
title 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
title_full 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
title_fullStr 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
title_full_unstemmed 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
title_short 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
title_sort 144. antifungal use trends in hospitalized adults in the united states, 2016-2020
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643949/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.346
work_keys_str_mv AT kaipemilya 144antifungalusetrendsinhospitalizedadultsintheunitedstates20162020
AT shippeyernie 144antifungalusetrendsinhospitalizedadultsintheunitedstates20162020
AT macdougallconan 144antifungalusetrendsinhospitalizedadultsintheunitedstates20162020