Cargando…

659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting

BACKGROUND: Microbial identification & antibiotic susceptibility testing is an important investigation in clinical microbiology laboratory. In many centres in India the report has only the isolate and antibiotics tested. The additional comments if added give guidance to the clinicians to utilize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kochhi, Raksha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643964/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.856
_version_ 1784609975759273984
author Kochhi, Raksha
author_facet Kochhi, Raksha
author_sort Kochhi, Raksha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbial identification & antibiotic susceptibility testing is an important investigation in clinical microbiology laboratory. In many centres in India the report has only the isolate and antibiotics tested. The additional comments if added give guidance to the clinicians to utilize the results. Pre-analytical issues of adequate & relevant clinical history, appropriate sampling techniques, timely transport & storage, history of antibiotic usage along with post analytical issues of recommended line of antibiotic therapy and infection control practices are better addressed with this practice. [Image: see text] METHODS: This was a prospective qualitative study from the period of January 2017-March 2021 where in the standard operating protocol of Clinical Microbiology was reviewed and appropriate comments were included in the Laboratory Information System once the isolate was identified using VITEK 2, automated ID/AST instrument and interfaced. The Clinical Microbiologist would then review the comments upon discussion with the clinicians and then authorize reports. The reports included sample & isolate specific details , recommended antibiotic therapy and infection control related comments. This was based on standard international and national guidelines (CLSI, EUCAST, IDSA, IAP, and National Treatment Guidelines of India). [Image: see text] RESULTS: There was a gradual improvement in completion of request forms with clinical history, sample site and antibiotic history being mentioned. This was assessed through periodic audits conducted every quarter from 36% in March 2017 to 95% in March 2021. Clinical communication with the microbiology laboratory also showed improvement with documentation. Feedback from clinicians was also taken on the utility of these comments, (87/120)72.5% of the clinicians found them useful(Grade 5). (32/120) 26 %(Grade 3) of the clinicians had concerns about the turnaround time and requested for provisional reports. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Interpretative comments in reports act as a bridge between clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and infection control. They help us to choose the correct antibiotics or sometimes no antibiotics when the situation demands it. With all the recent advancements, the clinico-microbiological utility of culture reports is the need of the hour. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86439642021-12-06 659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting Kochhi, Raksha Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Microbial identification & antibiotic susceptibility testing is an important investigation in clinical microbiology laboratory. In many centres in India the report has only the isolate and antibiotics tested. The additional comments if added give guidance to the clinicians to utilize the results. Pre-analytical issues of adequate & relevant clinical history, appropriate sampling techniques, timely transport & storage, history of antibiotic usage along with post analytical issues of recommended line of antibiotic therapy and infection control practices are better addressed with this practice. [Image: see text] METHODS: This was a prospective qualitative study from the period of January 2017-March 2021 where in the standard operating protocol of Clinical Microbiology was reviewed and appropriate comments were included in the Laboratory Information System once the isolate was identified using VITEK 2, automated ID/AST instrument and interfaced. The Clinical Microbiologist would then review the comments upon discussion with the clinicians and then authorize reports. The reports included sample & isolate specific details , recommended antibiotic therapy and infection control related comments. This was based on standard international and national guidelines (CLSI, EUCAST, IDSA, IAP, and National Treatment Guidelines of India). [Image: see text] RESULTS: There was a gradual improvement in completion of request forms with clinical history, sample site and antibiotic history being mentioned. This was assessed through periodic audits conducted every quarter from 36% in March 2017 to 95% in March 2021. Clinical communication with the microbiology laboratory also showed improvement with documentation. Feedback from clinicians was also taken on the utility of these comments, (87/120)72.5% of the clinicians found them useful(Grade 5). (32/120) 26 %(Grade 3) of the clinicians had concerns about the turnaround time and requested for provisional reports. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Interpretative comments in reports act as a bridge between clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and infection control. They help us to choose the correct antibiotics or sometimes no antibiotics when the situation demands it. With all the recent advancements, the clinico-microbiological utility of culture reports is the need of the hour. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643964/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.856 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Kochhi, Raksha
659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting
title 659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting
title_full 659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting
title_fullStr 659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting
title_full_unstemmed 659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting
title_short 659. Correlate Clinically and More-Use of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Microbiology Reporting
title_sort 659. correlate clinically and more-use of interpretative comments in clinical microbiology reporting
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643964/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.856
work_keys_str_mv AT kochhiraksha 659correlateclinicallyandmoreuseofinterpretativecommentsinclinicalmicrobiologyreporting