Cargando…

148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem restriction criteria (CRC) were developed by our health system to conserve the prescribing of these broad-spectrum agents. The purpose of this study was to compare pre and post EMR implementation of adherence to the system-approved CRC and if there was an association with decr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naderi, Mandana, Welker, Kimberly, Chan, Gary, Nix, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643978/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.350
_version_ 1784609979152465920
author Naderi, Mandana
Welker, Kimberly
Chan, Gary
Nix, David
author_facet Naderi, Mandana
Welker, Kimberly
Chan, Gary
Nix, David
author_sort Naderi, Mandana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carbapenem restriction criteria (CRC) were developed by our health system to conserve the prescribing of these broad-spectrum agents. The purpose of this study was to compare pre and post EMR implementation of adherence to the system-approved CRC and if there was an association with decreased utilization of carbapenems. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review from January 2018 to June 2020 was performed via the Cerner EMR at 3 community hospitals in Arizona (AZ) and California (CA) to determine if CRC was appropriate at time of carbapenem initiation. Admitted patients > 18 years prescribed meropenem or ertapenem and received at least one dose were included. Health System approved CRC are shown in Table 2. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were analyzed, including 60 pre-EMR CRC intervention and 100 post intervention. Forty-five patients (28%) had a documented history of ESBL infection as shown in Table 1. Figure 1 shows carbapenem utilization over the study period. An interrupted time series analysis was performed for both AZ and CA. After correcting for pre-intervention trends, AZ days of therapy (DOT) decreased by 6.2 DOT per 1000 patient days within 1 month post intervention (23%, p< 0.0001); the model predicted a further drop of 0.6 DOT per 1000 patient days per month over the 6 months post intervention. The CA DOT decreased by 1.2 DOT per 1000 patient days 1 month post intervention (17%, p= 0.28), with a predicted further drop of 0.28 DOT per 1000 patient days per month over the 6-month period post intervention. Post implementation retrospective review as described in Table 2 aligned with EMR restriction criteria selection for 68% of patients; interfacility differences occurred with 96% of CA reviews supported by criteria and 59% of AZ reviews supported by criteria (p= 0.0025). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: This analysis supports that implementation of an EMR tool is an effective intervention to decrease unnecessary carbapenem use at the time of prescribing. The ESBL rate was similar pre and post intervention which may indicate that decreases in DOT were not due to a difference in MDRO rate. This study also highlights the different baseline antibiotic prescribing practices that may exist between facilities. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8643978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86439782021-12-06 148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing Naderi, Mandana Welker, Kimberly Chan, Gary Nix, David Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Carbapenem restriction criteria (CRC) were developed by our health system to conserve the prescribing of these broad-spectrum agents. The purpose of this study was to compare pre and post EMR implementation of adherence to the system-approved CRC and if there was an association with decreased utilization of carbapenems. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review from January 2018 to June 2020 was performed via the Cerner EMR at 3 community hospitals in Arizona (AZ) and California (CA) to determine if CRC was appropriate at time of carbapenem initiation. Admitted patients > 18 years prescribed meropenem or ertapenem and received at least one dose were included. Health System approved CRC are shown in Table 2. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were analyzed, including 60 pre-EMR CRC intervention and 100 post intervention. Forty-five patients (28%) had a documented history of ESBL infection as shown in Table 1. Figure 1 shows carbapenem utilization over the study period. An interrupted time series analysis was performed for both AZ and CA. After correcting for pre-intervention trends, AZ days of therapy (DOT) decreased by 6.2 DOT per 1000 patient days within 1 month post intervention (23%, p< 0.0001); the model predicted a further drop of 0.6 DOT per 1000 patient days per month over the 6 months post intervention. The CA DOT decreased by 1.2 DOT per 1000 patient days 1 month post intervention (17%, p= 0.28), with a predicted further drop of 0.28 DOT per 1000 patient days per month over the 6-month period post intervention. Post implementation retrospective review as described in Table 2 aligned with EMR restriction criteria selection for 68% of patients; interfacility differences occurred with 96% of CA reviews supported by criteria and 59% of AZ reviews supported by criteria (p= 0.0025). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: This analysis supports that implementation of an EMR tool is an effective intervention to decrease unnecessary carbapenem use at the time of prescribing. The ESBL rate was similar pre and post intervention which may indicate that decreases in DOT were not due to a difference in MDRO rate. This study also highlights the different baseline antibiotic prescribing practices that may exist between facilities. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8643978/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.350 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Naderi, Mandana
Welker, Kimberly
Chan, Gary
Nix, David
148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing
title 148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing
title_full 148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing
title_fullStr 148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing
title_full_unstemmed 148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing
title_short 148. Implementation of Restriction Criteria within an Electronic Medical Record and Its Impact on Carbapenem Prescribing
title_sort 148. implementation of restriction criteria within an electronic medical record and its impact on carbapenem prescribing
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8643978/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.350
work_keys_str_mv AT naderimandana 148implementationofrestrictioncriteriawithinanelectronicmedicalrecordanditsimpactoncarbapenemprescribing
AT welkerkimberly 148implementationofrestrictioncriteriawithinanelectronicmedicalrecordanditsimpactoncarbapenemprescribing
AT changary 148implementationofrestrictioncriteriawithinanelectronicmedicalrecordanditsimpactoncarbapenemprescribing
AT nixdavid 148implementationofrestrictioncriteriawithinanelectronicmedicalrecordanditsimpactoncarbapenemprescribing