Cargando…

529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials

BACKGROUND: There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wentzel, Hannah, Wang, Junzheng, Dayanamby, Abbienaya, Pilkington, Victoria, Levi, Jacob, Hill, Andrew, Ellis, Leah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644070/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.728
_version_ 1784610000869523456
author Wentzel, Hannah
Wang, Junzheng
Dayanamby, Abbienaya
Pilkington, Victoria
Levi, Jacob
Hill, Andrew
Ellis, Leah
author_facet Wentzel, Hannah
Wang, Junzheng
Dayanamby, Abbienaya
Pilkington, Victoria
Levi, Jacob
Hill, Andrew
Ellis, Leah
author_sort Wentzel, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readily available antiparasitic drug which may be suitable for treatment in mild and moderate disease stages. It recently demonstrated anti-viral properties in vitro and now over 80 clinical trials have been registered worldwide to test its effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. This meta-analysis aims to collect data on adverse events reported in new COVID-19 treatment trials for the use of ivermectin as a repurposed medication. METHODS: Data was extracted from randomised trials of COVID-19 treatment trials identified through systematic searches of PUBMED, EMBASE, MedRxiv and trial registries. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis is the frequency of adverse events. Key safety events included serious, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and dermatological adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 18 trials investigating ivermectin for COVID-19 in a total of 2496 participants reported safety data and were included. There was no significant difference in the proportion of all adverse events between ivermectin and the comparator. There were 371/1261 (29%) adverse events recorded in the ivermectin containing arms and 376/1284 (29%) in the control arms (RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.77 - 1.34]; p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events across treatment arms (RR 1.95 [95% CI 0.75 - 5.11]; p = 0.18). No significant differences between ivermectin and the control were seen across different subcategories of adverse events. Figure 1 shows a summary of the results for all adverse events. [Image: see text] Forest plot comparing ivermectin and the control for all adverse events in COVID-19 trials, subdivided into single-day dosing trials and multi-day dosing trials. CONCLUSION: The results of recent COVID-19 trials show that overall, ivermectin is safe and well-tolerated. No significant difference in adverse event reporting was found across all subgroups in single and multi-day treatment regimens for the studies analysed. Safety reporting methodologies often varied across trials. Future and ongoing trials should be encouraged to collect and monitor safety data systematically. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86440702021-12-06 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials Wentzel, Hannah Wang, Junzheng Dayanamby, Abbienaya Pilkington, Victoria Levi, Jacob Hill, Andrew Ellis, Leah Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readily available antiparasitic drug which may be suitable for treatment in mild and moderate disease stages. It recently demonstrated anti-viral properties in vitro and now over 80 clinical trials have been registered worldwide to test its effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. This meta-analysis aims to collect data on adverse events reported in new COVID-19 treatment trials for the use of ivermectin as a repurposed medication. METHODS: Data was extracted from randomised trials of COVID-19 treatment trials identified through systematic searches of PUBMED, EMBASE, MedRxiv and trial registries. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis is the frequency of adverse events. Key safety events included serious, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and dermatological adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 18 trials investigating ivermectin for COVID-19 in a total of 2496 participants reported safety data and were included. There was no significant difference in the proportion of all adverse events between ivermectin and the comparator. There were 371/1261 (29%) adverse events recorded in the ivermectin containing arms and 376/1284 (29%) in the control arms (RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.77 - 1.34]; p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events across treatment arms (RR 1.95 [95% CI 0.75 - 5.11]; p = 0.18). No significant differences between ivermectin and the control were seen across different subcategories of adverse events. Figure 1 shows a summary of the results for all adverse events. [Image: see text] Forest plot comparing ivermectin and the control for all adverse events in COVID-19 trials, subdivided into single-day dosing trials and multi-day dosing trials. CONCLUSION: The results of recent COVID-19 trials show that overall, ivermectin is safe and well-tolerated. No significant difference in adverse event reporting was found across all subgroups in single and multi-day treatment regimens for the studies analysed. Safety reporting methodologies often varied across trials. Future and ongoing trials should be encouraged to collect and monitor safety data systematically. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644070/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.728 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Wentzel, Hannah
Wang, Junzheng
Dayanamby, Abbienaya
Pilkington, Victoria
Levi, Jacob
Hill, Andrew
Ellis, Leah
529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
title 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
title_full 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
title_fullStr 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
title_full_unstemmed 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
title_short 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
title_sort 529. systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin safety profile in covid-19 trials
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644070/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.728
work_keys_str_mv AT wentzelhannah 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials
AT wangjunzheng 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials
AT dayanambyabbienaya 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials
AT pilkingtonvictoria 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials
AT levijacob 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials
AT hillandrew 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials
AT ellisleah 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials