Cargando…
529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials
BACKGROUND: There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644070/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.728 |
_version_ | 1784610000869523456 |
---|---|
author | Wentzel, Hannah Wang, Junzheng Dayanamby, Abbienaya Pilkington, Victoria Levi, Jacob Hill, Andrew Ellis, Leah |
author_facet | Wentzel, Hannah Wang, Junzheng Dayanamby, Abbienaya Pilkington, Victoria Levi, Jacob Hill, Andrew Ellis, Leah |
author_sort | Wentzel, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readily available antiparasitic drug which may be suitable for treatment in mild and moderate disease stages. It recently demonstrated anti-viral properties in vitro and now over 80 clinical trials have been registered worldwide to test its effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. This meta-analysis aims to collect data on adverse events reported in new COVID-19 treatment trials for the use of ivermectin as a repurposed medication. METHODS: Data was extracted from randomised trials of COVID-19 treatment trials identified through systematic searches of PUBMED, EMBASE, MedRxiv and trial registries. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis is the frequency of adverse events. Key safety events included serious, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and dermatological adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 18 trials investigating ivermectin for COVID-19 in a total of 2496 participants reported safety data and were included. There was no significant difference in the proportion of all adverse events between ivermectin and the comparator. There were 371/1261 (29%) adverse events recorded in the ivermectin containing arms and 376/1284 (29%) in the control arms (RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.77 - 1.34]; p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events across treatment arms (RR 1.95 [95% CI 0.75 - 5.11]; p = 0.18). No significant differences between ivermectin and the control were seen across different subcategories of adverse events. Figure 1 shows a summary of the results for all adverse events. [Image: see text] Forest plot comparing ivermectin and the control for all adverse events in COVID-19 trials, subdivided into single-day dosing trials and multi-day dosing trials. CONCLUSION: The results of recent COVID-19 trials show that overall, ivermectin is safe and well-tolerated. No significant difference in adverse event reporting was found across all subgroups in single and multi-day treatment regimens for the studies analysed. Safety reporting methodologies often varied across trials. Future and ongoing trials should be encouraged to collect and monitor safety data systematically. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8644070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86440702021-12-06 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials Wentzel, Hannah Wang, Junzheng Dayanamby, Abbienaya Pilkington, Victoria Levi, Jacob Hill, Andrew Ellis, Leah Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readily available antiparasitic drug which may be suitable for treatment in mild and moderate disease stages. It recently demonstrated anti-viral properties in vitro and now over 80 clinical trials have been registered worldwide to test its effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. This meta-analysis aims to collect data on adverse events reported in new COVID-19 treatment trials for the use of ivermectin as a repurposed medication. METHODS: Data was extracted from randomised trials of COVID-19 treatment trials identified through systematic searches of PUBMED, EMBASE, MedRxiv and trial registries. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis is the frequency of adverse events. Key safety events included serious, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and dermatological adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 18 trials investigating ivermectin for COVID-19 in a total of 2496 participants reported safety data and were included. There was no significant difference in the proportion of all adverse events between ivermectin and the comparator. There were 371/1261 (29%) adverse events recorded in the ivermectin containing arms and 376/1284 (29%) in the control arms (RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.77 - 1.34]; p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events across treatment arms (RR 1.95 [95% CI 0.75 - 5.11]; p = 0.18). No significant differences between ivermectin and the control were seen across different subcategories of adverse events. Figure 1 shows a summary of the results for all adverse events. [Image: see text] Forest plot comparing ivermectin and the control for all adverse events in COVID-19 trials, subdivided into single-day dosing trials and multi-day dosing trials. CONCLUSION: The results of recent COVID-19 trials show that overall, ivermectin is safe and well-tolerated. No significant difference in adverse event reporting was found across all subgroups in single and multi-day treatment regimens for the studies analysed. Safety reporting methodologies often varied across trials. Future and ongoing trials should be encouraged to collect and monitor safety data systematically. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644070/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.728 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Wentzel, Hannah Wang, Junzheng Dayanamby, Abbienaya Pilkington, Victoria Levi, Jacob Hill, Andrew Ellis, Leah 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials |
title | 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials |
title_full | 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials |
title_fullStr | 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials |
title_short | 529. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin Safety Profile in COVID-19 Trials |
title_sort | 529. systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin safety profile in covid-19 trials |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644070/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wentzelhannah 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials AT wangjunzheng 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials AT dayanambyabbienaya 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials AT pilkingtonvictoria 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials AT levijacob 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials AT hillandrew 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials AT ellisleah 529systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofivermectinsafetyprofileincovid19trials |