Cargando…

1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp

BACKGROUND: Achromobacter spp. is intrinsically resistant to multiple antibiotics, and the treatment options are limited. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a siderophore cephalosporin approved in US and EU, is active against a wide variety of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakai, Ryuichiro, makino, Ayaka, Hama, Hitomi, Yoshitomi, Toriko, Nakamura, Rio, Hackel, Meredith, Takemura, Miki, Sahm, Daniel F, Yamano, Yoshinori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644153/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1260
_version_ 1784610020347871232
author Nakai, Ryuichiro
makino, Ayaka
Hama, Hitomi
Yoshitomi, Toriko
Nakamura, Rio
Hackel, Meredith
Takemura, Miki
Sahm, Daniel F
Yamano, Yoshinori
author_facet Nakai, Ryuichiro
makino, Ayaka
Hama, Hitomi
Yoshitomi, Toriko
Nakamura, Rio
Hackel, Meredith
Takemura, Miki
Sahm, Daniel F
Yamano, Yoshinori
author_sort Nakai, Ryuichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Achromobacter spp. is intrinsically resistant to multiple antibiotics, and the treatment options are limited. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a siderophore cephalosporin approved in US and EU, is active against a wide variety of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. In this study, in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of CFDC against Achromobacter spp. was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 334 global isolates collected by IHMA from 39 countries in 2015-2019 were used. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CFDC and comparators were determined by broth microdilution method using iron-depleted CAMHB or CAMHB, respectively, as recommended by CLSI guidelines. In vivo efficacy of CFDC was compared with meropenem (MEM), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/TAZ), ceftazidime (CAZ), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) in a neutropenic murine lung infection model (n=5), and compared with MEM in a immunocompetent rat lung infection model (n=3-7) caused by 2 A. xylosoxydans. In the murine model, treatment was given 2, 5, and 8 hours post-infection, and the numbers of viable cfu in lungs were determined 24 hours post-infection. In the rat model, the humanized PK in plasma resulting from CFDC 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) or meropenem 1 g every 8 h (0.5-h infusion) were recreated via continuous intravenous infusion for 4 days, following which cfu in lungs were determined. RESULTS: CFDC showed in vitro activity with MIC(50/90) of 0.06/0.5 µg/mL against 334 Achromobacter spp. Only 7 isolates (2.1%) had MICs > 4 µg/mL. These were the lowest values among all compound tested (Table). In the murine model, CFDC caused > 1.5 log(10) decrease of viable cfu in lungs at 100 mg/kg dose (%fT >MIC: < 50%) from baseline control against both of strains (CFDC MIC: 0.5 and 2 µg/mL) (P< 0.05). No decrease of cfu in lungs was observed for the comparators at 100 mg/kg (MEM, PIP/TAZ, CAZ, and CIP MICs were >16, >64, >32, and >8 µg/mL, respectively). In the rat model, humanized CFDC dosing reduced the viable cfu by >1 log(10) CFU/lung compared with baseline controls (P< 0.05). MEM showed no significant activity. In vitro activity of CFDC and comparator agents against Achromobacter spp. [Image: see text] 334 Achromobacter spp. isolates collected from 2015 and 2019. The majority of isolates tested were A. xylosoxidans (312/334; 93.4%), followed by A. insolitus (11/334; 3.3%), Achromobacter sp. (8/334; 2.4%), A. denitrificans (2/334; 0.6%), and A. piechaudii (1/334; 0.3%). CONCLUSION: CFDC showed potent in vivo efficacy reflecting in vitro activity against A. xylosoxidans. The results suggested that CFDC has the potential to be an effective therapeutic option for Achromobacter spp. infections. DISCLOSURES: Ryuichiro Nakai, MSc, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Ayaka makino, BSc, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Toriko Yoshitomi, -, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Rio Nakamura, BSc, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Miki Takemura, MS, SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi (Employee)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86441532021-12-06 1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp Nakai, Ryuichiro makino, Ayaka Hama, Hitomi Yoshitomi, Toriko Nakamura, Rio Hackel, Meredith Takemura, Miki Sahm, Daniel F Yamano, Yoshinori Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Achromobacter spp. is intrinsically resistant to multiple antibiotics, and the treatment options are limited. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a siderophore cephalosporin approved in US and EU, is active against a wide variety of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. In this study, in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of CFDC against Achromobacter spp. was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 334 global isolates collected by IHMA from 39 countries in 2015-2019 were used. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CFDC and comparators were determined by broth microdilution method using iron-depleted CAMHB or CAMHB, respectively, as recommended by CLSI guidelines. In vivo efficacy of CFDC was compared with meropenem (MEM), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/TAZ), ceftazidime (CAZ), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) in a neutropenic murine lung infection model (n=5), and compared with MEM in a immunocompetent rat lung infection model (n=3-7) caused by 2 A. xylosoxydans. In the murine model, treatment was given 2, 5, and 8 hours post-infection, and the numbers of viable cfu in lungs were determined 24 hours post-infection. In the rat model, the humanized PK in plasma resulting from CFDC 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) or meropenem 1 g every 8 h (0.5-h infusion) were recreated via continuous intravenous infusion for 4 days, following which cfu in lungs were determined. RESULTS: CFDC showed in vitro activity with MIC(50/90) of 0.06/0.5 µg/mL against 334 Achromobacter spp. Only 7 isolates (2.1%) had MICs > 4 µg/mL. These were the lowest values among all compound tested (Table). In the murine model, CFDC caused > 1.5 log(10) decrease of viable cfu in lungs at 100 mg/kg dose (%fT >MIC: < 50%) from baseline control against both of strains (CFDC MIC: 0.5 and 2 µg/mL) (P< 0.05). No decrease of cfu in lungs was observed for the comparators at 100 mg/kg (MEM, PIP/TAZ, CAZ, and CIP MICs were >16, >64, >32, and >8 µg/mL, respectively). In the rat model, humanized CFDC dosing reduced the viable cfu by >1 log(10) CFU/lung compared with baseline controls (P< 0.05). MEM showed no significant activity. In vitro activity of CFDC and comparator agents against Achromobacter spp. [Image: see text] 334 Achromobacter spp. isolates collected from 2015 and 2019. The majority of isolates tested were A. xylosoxidans (312/334; 93.4%), followed by A. insolitus (11/334; 3.3%), Achromobacter sp. (8/334; 2.4%), A. denitrificans (2/334; 0.6%), and A. piechaudii (1/334; 0.3%). CONCLUSION: CFDC showed potent in vivo efficacy reflecting in vitro activity against A. xylosoxidans. The results suggested that CFDC has the potential to be an effective therapeutic option for Achromobacter spp. infections. DISCLOSURES: Ryuichiro Nakai, MSc, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Ayaka makino, BSc, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Toriko Yoshitomi, -, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Rio Nakamura, BSc, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Miki Takemura, MS, SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi (Employee) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644153/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1260 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Nakai, Ryuichiro
makino, Ayaka
Hama, Hitomi
Yoshitomi, Toriko
Nakamura, Rio
Hackel, Meredith
Takemura, Miki
Sahm, Daniel F
Yamano, Yoshinori
1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp
title 1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp
title_full 1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp
title_fullStr 1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp
title_full_unstemmed 1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp
title_short 1066. In Vitro and in Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Achromobacter spp
title_sort 1066. in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of cefiderocol and comparators against achromobacter spp
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644153/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1260
work_keys_str_mv AT nakairyuichiro 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT makinoayaka 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT hamahitomi 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT yoshitomitoriko 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT nakamurario 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT hackelmeredith 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT takemuramiki 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT sahmdanielf 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp
AT yamanoyoshinori 1066invitroandinvivoantimicrobialactivityofcefiderocolandcomparatorsagainstachromobacterspp