Cargando…
6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. The clinical importance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB), however, is poorly defined despite it being a frequent laboratory finding. We therefore examined pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644202/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.006 |
_version_ | 1784610031457533952 |
---|---|
author | Go, John Raymond U Challener, Douglas Corsini Campioli, Cristina G Sohail, Muhammad R Palraj, Raj Baddour, Larry M Saleh, Omar Abu |
author_facet | Go, John Raymond U Challener, Douglas Corsini Campioli, Cristina G Sohail, Muhammad R Palraj, Raj Baddour, Larry M Saleh, Omar Abu |
author_sort | Go, John Raymond U |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. The clinical importance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB), however, is poorly defined despite it being a frequent laboratory finding. We therefore examined patients with SPBCB to determine its clinical significance and to understand the rationale of current practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with a SPBCB for S. aureus in initial cultures from January 2019 to December 2019 using data collected from both electronic health records and the clinical microbiology laboratory. [Image: see text] RESULTS: Overall, 534 patients with SAB were identified, and 118 (22.1%) had a SPBCB. Among SPBCB cases, 106 (89.3%) were classified as clinically significant while 12 were considered contaminated or of unclear clinical significance. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups (Table 1). A majority (92.4%) received antibiotic therapy, but patients with clinically significant bacteremia were treated with a longer antibiotic course (25.9 vs 5.7 days, p< 0.001). Outcomes between those with SPBCB (contaminant vs clinically significant) were similar (Table 2). Of note, while there was no difference in use of echocardiography based on PREDICT criteria between the clinically significant SPBCB vs. the multiple positive blood culture bottles (MPBC) cohorts (Table 3), significant differences were seen in both frequency of echocardiography (65.1% vs. 84.6%, P< 0.001) and IE diagnosis (3.8% vs. 14.2%, P=0.002) for patients in the SPBCB vs. MPBC groups, respectively. In addition, those with MPBC had higher 90-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: SPBCB was documented in almost one-quarter of SAB cases and should trigger a thorough investigation as its associated mortality was high and complications, including IE, occurred. Although some SPBCB cases may represent contamination, antibiotic treatment of SPBCB was commonplace. Patients with clinically significant SPBCB were less likely to undergo echocardiography and had a reduced prevalence of an IE diagnosis as compared to those with MPBC. Patients with SPBCB may have a more favorable long-term prognosis as compared to that in patients with MPBC. DISCLOSURES: Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant) Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8644202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86442022021-12-06 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? Go, John Raymond U Challener, Douglas Corsini Campioli, Cristina G Sohail, Muhammad R Palraj, Raj Baddour, Larry M Saleh, Omar Abu Open Forum Infect Dis Oral Abstracts BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. The clinical importance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB), however, is poorly defined despite it being a frequent laboratory finding. We therefore examined patients with SPBCB to determine its clinical significance and to understand the rationale of current practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with a SPBCB for S. aureus in initial cultures from January 2019 to December 2019 using data collected from both electronic health records and the clinical microbiology laboratory. [Image: see text] RESULTS: Overall, 534 patients with SAB were identified, and 118 (22.1%) had a SPBCB. Among SPBCB cases, 106 (89.3%) were classified as clinically significant while 12 were considered contaminated or of unclear clinical significance. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups (Table 1). A majority (92.4%) received antibiotic therapy, but patients with clinically significant bacteremia were treated with a longer antibiotic course (25.9 vs 5.7 days, p< 0.001). Outcomes between those with SPBCB (contaminant vs clinically significant) were similar (Table 2). Of note, while there was no difference in use of echocardiography based on PREDICT criteria between the clinically significant SPBCB vs. the multiple positive blood culture bottles (MPBC) cohorts (Table 3), significant differences were seen in both frequency of echocardiography (65.1% vs. 84.6%, P< 0.001) and IE diagnosis (3.8% vs. 14.2%, P=0.002) for patients in the SPBCB vs. MPBC groups, respectively. In addition, those with MPBC had higher 90-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: SPBCB was documented in almost one-quarter of SAB cases and should trigger a thorough investigation as its associated mortality was high and complications, including IE, occurred. Although some SPBCB cases may represent contamination, antibiotic treatment of SPBCB was commonplace. Patients with clinically significant SPBCB were less likely to undergo echocardiography and had a reduced prevalence of an IE diagnosis as compared to those with MPBC. Patients with SPBCB may have a more favorable long-term prognosis as compared to that in patients with MPBC. DISCLOSURES: Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant) Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644202/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.006 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oral Abstracts Go, John Raymond U Challener, Douglas Corsini Campioli, Cristina G Sohail, Muhammad R Palraj, Raj Baddour, Larry M Saleh, Omar Abu 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? |
title | 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? |
title_full | 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? |
title_fullStr | 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? |
title_full_unstemmed | 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? |
title_short | 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? |
title_sort | 6. staphylococcus aureus in a single blood culture bottle: should we be concerned? |
topic | Oral Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644202/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gojohnraymondu 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned AT challenerdouglas 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned AT corsinicampiolicristinag 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned AT sohailmuhammadr 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned AT palrajraj 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned AT baddourlarrym 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned AT salehomarabu 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned |