Cargando…

6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. The clinical importance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB), however, is poorly defined despite it being a frequent laboratory finding. We therefore examined pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Go, John Raymond U, Challener, Douglas, Corsini Campioli, Cristina G, Sohail, Muhammad R, Palraj, Raj, Baddour, Larry M, Saleh, Omar Abu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644202/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.006
_version_ 1784610031457533952
author Go, John Raymond U
Challener, Douglas
Corsini Campioli, Cristina G
Sohail, Muhammad R
Palraj, Raj
Baddour, Larry M
Saleh, Omar Abu
author_facet Go, John Raymond U
Challener, Douglas
Corsini Campioli, Cristina G
Sohail, Muhammad R
Palraj, Raj
Baddour, Larry M
Saleh, Omar Abu
author_sort Go, John Raymond U
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. The clinical importance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB), however, is poorly defined despite it being a frequent laboratory finding. We therefore examined patients with SPBCB to determine its clinical significance and to understand the rationale of current practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with a SPBCB for S. aureus in initial cultures from January 2019 to December 2019 using data collected from both electronic health records and the clinical microbiology laboratory. [Image: see text] RESULTS: Overall, 534 patients with SAB were identified, and 118 (22.1%) had a SPBCB. Among SPBCB cases, 106 (89.3%) were classified as clinically significant while 12 were considered contaminated or of unclear clinical significance. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups (Table 1). A majority (92.4%) received antibiotic therapy, but patients with clinically significant bacteremia were treated with a longer antibiotic course (25.9 vs 5.7 days, p< 0.001). Outcomes between those with SPBCB (contaminant vs clinically significant) were similar (Table 2). Of note, while there was no difference in use of echocardiography based on PREDICT criteria between the clinically significant SPBCB vs. the multiple positive blood culture bottles (MPBC) cohorts (Table 3), significant differences were seen in both frequency of echocardiography (65.1% vs. 84.6%, P< 0.001) and IE diagnosis (3.8% vs. 14.2%, P=0.002) for patients in the SPBCB vs. MPBC groups, respectively. In addition, those with MPBC had higher 90-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: SPBCB was documented in almost one-quarter of SAB cases and should trigger a thorough investigation as its associated mortality was high and complications, including IE, occurred. Although some SPBCB cases may represent contamination, antibiotic treatment of SPBCB was commonplace. Patients with clinically significant SPBCB were less likely to undergo echocardiography and had a reduced prevalence of an IE diagnosis as compared to those with MPBC. Patients with SPBCB may have a more favorable long-term prognosis as compared to that in patients with MPBC. DISCLOSURES: Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant) Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86442022021-12-06 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned? Go, John Raymond U Challener, Douglas Corsini Campioli, Cristina G Sohail, Muhammad R Palraj, Raj Baddour, Larry M Saleh, Omar Abu Open Forum Infect Dis Oral Abstracts BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. The clinical importance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB), however, is poorly defined despite it being a frequent laboratory finding. We therefore examined patients with SPBCB to determine its clinical significance and to understand the rationale of current practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with a SPBCB for S. aureus in initial cultures from January 2019 to December 2019 using data collected from both electronic health records and the clinical microbiology laboratory. [Image: see text] RESULTS: Overall, 534 patients with SAB were identified, and 118 (22.1%) had a SPBCB. Among SPBCB cases, 106 (89.3%) were classified as clinically significant while 12 were considered contaminated or of unclear clinical significance. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups (Table 1). A majority (92.4%) received antibiotic therapy, but patients with clinically significant bacteremia were treated with a longer antibiotic course (25.9 vs 5.7 days, p< 0.001). Outcomes between those with SPBCB (contaminant vs clinically significant) were similar (Table 2). Of note, while there was no difference in use of echocardiography based on PREDICT criteria between the clinically significant SPBCB vs. the multiple positive blood culture bottles (MPBC) cohorts (Table 3), significant differences were seen in both frequency of echocardiography (65.1% vs. 84.6%, P< 0.001) and IE diagnosis (3.8% vs. 14.2%, P=0.002) for patients in the SPBCB vs. MPBC groups, respectively. In addition, those with MPBC had higher 90-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: SPBCB was documented in almost one-quarter of SAB cases and should trigger a thorough investigation as its associated mortality was high and complications, including IE, occurred. Although some SPBCB cases may represent contamination, antibiotic treatment of SPBCB was commonplace. Patients with clinically significant SPBCB were less likely to undergo echocardiography and had a reduced prevalence of an IE diagnosis as compared to those with MPBC. Patients with SPBCB may have a more favorable long-term prognosis as compared to that in patients with MPBC. DISCLOSURES: Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant) Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644202/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.006 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Abstracts
Go, John Raymond U
Challener, Douglas
Corsini Campioli, Cristina G
Sohail, Muhammad R
Palraj, Raj
Baddour, Larry M
Saleh, Omar Abu
6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
title 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
title_full 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
title_fullStr 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
title_full_unstemmed 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
title_short 6. Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Blood Culture Bottle: Should We be Concerned?
title_sort 6. staphylococcus aureus in a single blood culture bottle: should we be concerned?
topic Oral Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644202/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.006
work_keys_str_mv AT gojohnraymondu 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned
AT challenerdouglas 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned
AT corsinicampiolicristinag 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned
AT sohailmuhammadr 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned
AT palrajraj 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned
AT baddourlarrym 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned
AT salehomarabu 6staphylococcusaureusinasinglebloodculturebottleshouldwebeconcerned