Cargando…

379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12

BACKGROUND: Rapid testing to identify asymptomatically infected students with SARS-CoV-2 in elementary schools has been suggested as a possible method to reduce risk for in person instruction. As of August 3, 2020 (updated on January 25, 2021), California schools who obtained a waiver to conduct in-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veltman, Jennifer, Papayanis, Philip, Dubov, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644276/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.580
_version_ 1784610048377356288
author Veltman, Jennifer
Papayanis, Philip
Dubov, Alex
author_facet Veltman, Jennifer
Papayanis, Philip
Dubov, Alex
author_sort Veltman, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid testing to identify asymptomatically infected students with SARS-CoV-2 in elementary schools has been suggested as a possible method to reduce risk for in person instruction. As of August 3, 2020 (updated on January 25, 2021), California schools who obtained a waiver to conduct in-person instruction are not required to have mandatory testing for asymptomatic students, except for high contact sports which are required to undergo weekly testing. We explored the uptake of voluntary vs mandatory testing in a private waivered school. METHODS: Between the dates January 25, 2021 to April 16, 2021, the K-12 school superintendent sent an email to all parents outlining the voluntary testing program with a link to the on-line sign up and consent form. All students were offered weekly self-collected anterior nares BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test. Signed parental consent was required and tests were performed at the school. Students participating in contact sports were required to undergo testing the week a varsity game was played as a condition of participation. Data was gathered from the school administration and de-identified. RESULTS: K-5 Lower school had a school population of 448 students. Testing was offered on 8 weeks during the period of 2/15-2/19 to 4/5-4/9. 2 students (0.45%) receive screening on the week of 3/22-3/26. The other seven weeks when screening was offered 0 students received screening. 6-12 Upper school had a school population of 360 enrolled students. Testing was offered 3/8-3/12 and 3/15-3/19. The upper school had 22 students (6.11%) receive testing on the week of 3/8-3/12 and 21 students (5.83%) on the week of 3/15-3/19. Contact sports teams had 67 students on their roster. Weekly testing was offered from 3/22-3/26 to 4/12-4/16. Contact sports teams had 10 students (14.93%) receive testing on the week of 3/22-3/26, 33 students (52.24%) on the week of 4/5-4/9, and 32 students (49.25%) on the week of 4/12-4/16. Figure 1. Percent of students from each campus and sports team screened per week offered. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Voluntary SARS-CoV-2 screening was not a feasible approach for detection of asymptomatically infected individuals due to low uptake, however in the same school, mandatory testing had high uptake and would be a feasible strategy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86442762021-12-06 379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12 Veltman, Jennifer Papayanis, Philip Dubov, Alex Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Rapid testing to identify asymptomatically infected students with SARS-CoV-2 in elementary schools has been suggested as a possible method to reduce risk for in person instruction. As of August 3, 2020 (updated on January 25, 2021), California schools who obtained a waiver to conduct in-person instruction are not required to have mandatory testing for asymptomatic students, except for high contact sports which are required to undergo weekly testing. We explored the uptake of voluntary vs mandatory testing in a private waivered school. METHODS: Between the dates January 25, 2021 to April 16, 2021, the K-12 school superintendent sent an email to all parents outlining the voluntary testing program with a link to the on-line sign up and consent form. All students were offered weekly self-collected anterior nares BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test. Signed parental consent was required and tests were performed at the school. Students participating in contact sports were required to undergo testing the week a varsity game was played as a condition of participation. Data was gathered from the school administration and de-identified. RESULTS: K-5 Lower school had a school population of 448 students. Testing was offered on 8 weeks during the period of 2/15-2/19 to 4/5-4/9. 2 students (0.45%) receive screening on the week of 3/22-3/26. The other seven weeks when screening was offered 0 students received screening. 6-12 Upper school had a school population of 360 enrolled students. Testing was offered 3/8-3/12 and 3/15-3/19. The upper school had 22 students (6.11%) receive testing on the week of 3/8-3/12 and 21 students (5.83%) on the week of 3/15-3/19. Contact sports teams had 67 students on their roster. Weekly testing was offered from 3/22-3/26 to 4/12-4/16. Contact sports teams had 10 students (14.93%) receive testing on the week of 3/22-3/26, 33 students (52.24%) on the week of 4/5-4/9, and 32 students (49.25%) on the week of 4/12-4/16. Figure 1. Percent of students from each campus and sports team screened per week offered. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Voluntary SARS-CoV-2 screening was not a feasible approach for detection of asymptomatically infected individuals due to low uptake, however in the same school, mandatory testing had high uptake and would be a feasible strategy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644276/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.580 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Veltman, Jennifer
Papayanis, Philip
Dubov, Alex
379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12
title 379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12
title_full 379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12
title_fullStr 379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12
title_full_unstemmed 379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12
title_short 379. Abstract For Comparison of Mandatory vs Non-Mandatory Compliance Rates For SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Grades K-12
title_sort 379. abstract for comparison of mandatory vs non-mandatory compliance rates for sars-cov-2 testing in grades k-12
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644276/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.580
work_keys_str_mv AT veltmanjennifer 379abstractforcomparisonofmandatoryvsnonmandatorycomplianceratesforsarscov2testingingradesk12
AT papayanisphilip 379abstractforcomparisonofmandatoryvsnonmandatorycomplianceratesforsarscov2testingingradesk12
AT dubovalex 379abstractforcomparisonofmandatoryvsnonmandatorycomplianceratesforsarscov2testingingradesk12