Cargando…

769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are one of the leading healthcare-acquired infections (HAI) with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify risk factors of CLABSI at an academic medical center to determine high-risk populations and target interventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, Zane, Kang, Minji, Thomas, Elizabeth, Arocha, Doramarie, Trivedi, Julie B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644346/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.966
_version_ 1784610064627138560
author Conrad, Zane
Kang, Minji
Thomas, Elizabeth
Arocha, Doramarie
Trivedi, Julie B
author_facet Conrad, Zane
Kang, Minji
Thomas, Elizabeth
Arocha, Doramarie
Trivedi, Julie B
author_sort Conrad, Zane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are one of the leading healthcare-acquired infections (HAI) with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify risk factors of CLABSI at an academic medical center to determine high-risk populations and target interventions. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective cohort study at William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020. Retrospective chart review was conducted to identify demographics and co-morbidities of hospitalized patients diagnosed with CLABSI as defined by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Infections due to mucosal barrier injuries were excluded. Means were compared using independent-samples T-test and proportions were compared using chi-square. RESULTS: Ninety-three CLABSI events were identified with an increase in the standardized infection ratio from 0.38 in 2017 to 0.74 in 2020 (Figure 1). Bacterial organisms were identified in 71 (76%) cases while fungal organisms were identified in 22 (24%) (Table 2). There was no significant difference in the timing of CLABSI after line insertion (p=0.09) or organism identified (p=0.61) in PICC lines (n=33, 34%) vs all other central lines (n=60, 67%). When comparing immunocompromised patients with CLABSI (n=47, 51%) vs non-immunocompromised (n=46, 50%), there was a significant difference in the indication for line (chemotherapy), but no difference was seen in the number of line days prior to event (p=0.57), line type (p=0.17), or organism identified (p=0.94). Of all CLABSI, 46% (n=43) were in the intensive care unit (ICU) with significantly more Candida species (p=0.018) identified compared to non-ICU patients with CLABSI (n= 50, 54%). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] Figure 1. CLABSI Rate and SIR from 2017 to 2020 by Quarter [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Candida species were more likely to be found in ICU patients with CLABSI as compared to non-ICU counterparts with further investigation in the ICU population revealing lack of flushing after administration of total parenteral nutrition. Otherwise, this observational cohort of CLABSI events did not identify any difference in immunosuppression status or line type. Given this information, infection prevention efforts will continue to be directed towards proper central line maintenance and removal when no longer indicated. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86443462021-12-06 769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center Conrad, Zane Kang, Minji Thomas, Elizabeth Arocha, Doramarie Trivedi, Julie B Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are one of the leading healthcare-acquired infections (HAI) with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify risk factors of CLABSI at an academic medical center to determine high-risk populations and target interventions. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective cohort study at William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020. Retrospective chart review was conducted to identify demographics and co-morbidities of hospitalized patients diagnosed with CLABSI as defined by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Infections due to mucosal barrier injuries were excluded. Means were compared using independent-samples T-test and proportions were compared using chi-square. RESULTS: Ninety-three CLABSI events were identified with an increase in the standardized infection ratio from 0.38 in 2017 to 0.74 in 2020 (Figure 1). Bacterial organisms were identified in 71 (76%) cases while fungal organisms were identified in 22 (24%) (Table 2). There was no significant difference in the timing of CLABSI after line insertion (p=0.09) or organism identified (p=0.61) in PICC lines (n=33, 34%) vs all other central lines (n=60, 67%). When comparing immunocompromised patients with CLABSI (n=47, 51%) vs non-immunocompromised (n=46, 50%), there was a significant difference in the indication for line (chemotherapy), but no difference was seen in the number of line days prior to event (p=0.57), line type (p=0.17), or organism identified (p=0.94). Of all CLABSI, 46% (n=43) were in the intensive care unit (ICU) with significantly more Candida species (p=0.018) identified compared to non-ICU patients with CLABSI (n= 50, 54%). [Image: see text] [Image: see text] Figure 1. CLABSI Rate and SIR from 2017 to 2020 by Quarter [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Candida species were more likely to be found in ICU patients with CLABSI as compared to non-ICU counterparts with further investigation in the ICU population revealing lack of flushing after administration of total parenteral nutrition. Otherwise, this observational cohort of CLABSI events did not identify any difference in immunosuppression status or line type. Given this information, infection prevention efforts will continue to be directed towards proper central line maintenance and removal when no longer indicated. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644346/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.966 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Conrad, Zane
Kang, Minji
Thomas, Elizabeth
Arocha, Doramarie
Trivedi, Julie B
769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center
title 769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center
title_full 769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center
title_fullStr 769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed 769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center
title_short 769. Risk Factors of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection in an Academic Medical Center
title_sort 769. risk factors of central line-associated bloodstream infection in an academic medical center
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644346/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.966
work_keys_str_mv AT conradzane 769riskfactorsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectioninanacademicmedicalcenter
AT kangminji 769riskfactorsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectioninanacademicmedicalcenter
AT thomaselizabeth 769riskfactorsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectioninanacademicmedicalcenter
AT arochadoramarie 769riskfactorsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectioninanacademicmedicalcenter
AT trivedijulieb 769riskfactorsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectioninanacademicmedicalcenter