Cargando…

489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA

BACKGROUND: Antenatal care is a unique opportunity to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody response in pregnant people, including those with previously unknown infection. METHODS: Pregnant people were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG during antenatal care or delivery in Seattle, Washington with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LaCourse, Sylvia, Kachikis, Alisa, Kinderknecht, Kelsey L, Galang, Romeo R, Zapata, Lauren B, Yamamoto, Krissy M, Salerno, Carol C, Greninger, Alexander L, Englund, Janet A, Drake, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644361/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.688
_version_ 1784610067713097728
author LaCourse, Sylvia
Kachikis, Alisa
Kinderknecht, Kelsey L
Galang, Romeo R
Zapata, Lauren B
Yamamoto, Krissy M
Salerno, Carol C
Greninger, Alexander L
Englund, Janet A
Drake, Alison
author_facet LaCourse, Sylvia
Kachikis, Alisa
Kinderknecht, Kelsey L
Galang, Romeo R
Zapata, Lauren B
Yamamoto, Krissy M
Salerno, Carol C
Greninger, Alexander L
Englund, Janet A
Drake, Alison
author_sort LaCourse, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antenatal care is a unique opportunity to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody response in pregnant people, including those with previously unknown infection. METHODS: Pregnant people were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG during antenatal care or delivery in Seattle, Washington with Abbott Architect chemiluminescent immunoassay which provides quantitative index (positive ≥1.4). Participants with IgG+ results or identified with RT-PCR+ results via medical records were invited to enroll in a longitudinal evaluation of antibody responses. We report preliminary results of an ongoing seroprevalence and longitudinal study with planned 18-month follow-up. RESULTS: Between September 9, 2020–May 7, 2021, we screened 1304 pregnant people; 62 (4.8%) tested SARS-CoV-2 IgG+, including 28 (45%) with known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among participants testing IgG+, median age was 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] 26–35) and median gestational age was 21 weeks (IQR 12–38) at screening; median IgG index was 3.2 (IQR 2.1–4.9, range 1.4–9.9), including 3.9 (IQR 2.3–5.8) among those with vs. 2.7 (IQR 1.9–4.2) among those without prior RT-PCR+ results (p=0.05 by Wilcoxon rank-sum). Of 30 longitudinal study participants enrolled, 24 tested IgG+ at baseline (75% with prior RT-PCR+ result) and 6 tested IgG- on enrollment but were identified as previously RT-PCR+ via medical records; 24/30 (80%) reported previous symptoms. Of 24 participants testing IgG+ at baseline, 14 (58%) had first follow-up IgG results at median of 66 days (IQR 42–104) since initial testing, with median IgG index of 2.0 (IQR 1.0–3.8). 9/14 (64%) participants with repeat IgG testing remained IgG+ at first follow-up (≤280 days after first RT-PCR+ result for those with and ≥104 days after first IgG detection for those without prior RT-PCR+ results), while 5/14 (26%) had a negative Abbott IgG test at a median of 81 days (IQR 75–112) since initial testing. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Nearly half of pregnant people testing SARS-CoV-2 IgG+ reported no known prior SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis or symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response and durability in pregnancy has implications for maternal and neonatal protection and susceptibility and highlights potential benefits of vaccination in this population. DISCLOSURES: Sylvia LaCourse, MD, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Alisa Kachikis, MD, MS, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant) Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support) Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Meissa Vaccines (Consultant)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant)Teva Pharmaceuticals (Consultant) Alison Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck (Grant/Research Support)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86443612021-12-06 489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA LaCourse, Sylvia Kachikis, Alisa Kinderknecht, Kelsey L Galang, Romeo R Zapata, Lauren B Yamamoto, Krissy M Salerno, Carol C Greninger, Alexander L Englund, Janet A Drake, Alison Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antenatal care is a unique opportunity to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody response in pregnant people, including those with previously unknown infection. METHODS: Pregnant people were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG during antenatal care or delivery in Seattle, Washington with Abbott Architect chemiluminescent immunoassay which provides quantitative index (positive ≥1.4). Participants with IgG+ results or identified with RT-PCR+ results via medical records were invited to enroll in a longitudinal evaluation of antibody responses. We report preliminary results of an ongoing seroprevalence and longitudinal study with planned 18-month follow-up. RESULTS: Between September 9, 2020–May 7, 2021, we screened 1304 pregnant people; 62 (4.8%) tested SARS-CoV-2 IgG+, including 28 (45%) with known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among participants testing IgG+, median age was 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] 26–35) and median gestational age was 21 weeks (IQR 12–38) at screening; median IgG index was 3.2 (IQR 2.1–4.9, range 1.4–9.9), including 3.9 (IQR 2.3–5.8) among those with vs. 2.7 (IQR 1.9–4.2) among those without prior RT-PCR+ results (p=0.05 by Wilcoxon rank-sum). Of 30 longitudinal study participants enrolled, 24 tested IgG+ at baseline (75% with prior RT-PCR+ result) and 6 tested IgG- on enrollment but were identified as previously RT-PCR+ via medical records; 24/30 (80%) reported previous symptoms. Of 24 participants testing IgG+ at baseline, 14 (58%) had first follow-up IgG results at median of 66 days (IQR 42–104) since initial testing, with median IgG index of 2.0 (IQR 1.0–3.8). 9/14 (64%) participants with repeat IgG testing remained IgG+ at first follow-up (≤280 days after first RT-PCR+ result for those with and ≥104 days after first IgG detection for those without prior RT-PCR+ results), while 5/14 (26%) had a negative Abbott IgG test at a median of 81 days (IQR 75–112) since initial testing. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Nearly half of pregnant people testing SARS-CoV-2 IgG+ reported no known prior SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis or symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response and durability in pregnancy has implications for maternal and neonatal protection and susceptibility and highlights potential benefits of vaccination in this population. DISCLOSURES: Sylvia LaCourse, MD, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Alisa Kachikis, MD, MS, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant) Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support) Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Meissa Vaccines (Consultant)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant)Teva Pharmaceuticals (Consultant) Alison Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644361/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.688 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
LaCourse, Sylvia
Kachikis, Alisa
Kinderknecht, Kelsey L
Galang, Romeo R
Zapata, Lauren B
Yamamoto, Krissy M
Salerno, Carol C
Greninger, Alexander L
Englund, Janet A
Drake, Alison
489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
title 489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
title_full 489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
title_fullStr 489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
title_full_unstemmed 489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
title_short 489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
title_sort 489. sars-cov-2 seroprevalence and antibody response among pregnant people in seattle, wa
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644361/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.688
work_keys_str_mv AT lacoursesylvia 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT kachikisalisa 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT kinderknechtkelseyl 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT galangromeor 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT zapatalaurenb 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT yamamotokrissym 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT salernocarolc 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT greningeralexanderl 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT englundjaneta 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa
AT drakealison 489sarscov2seroprevalenceandantibodyresponseamongpregnantpeopleinseattlewa