Cargando…
24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
BACKGROUND: mRNA vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illicit strong humoral and cellular responses and have high efficacy for preventing and reducing the risk of severe illness from COVID-19. Since solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were excluded from the phase 3 trials, the effica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644376/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.024 |
_version_ | 1784610071184932864 |
---|---|
author | Powell, Megan Sherman, Amy C Klopfer, Julia Desjardins, Michaël Cheng, Chi-An Senussi, Yasmeen Ratnaparkhi, Saee Mitre, Xhoi Feeley, Monica Avila Paz, Andres A Kim, Andy J Rutherford, Henry Cauley, Jessica Kim, Austin Chang, Jun Bai Park Liakos, Alexis Woolley, Ann E Walt, David Baden, Lindsey R |
author_facet | Powell, Megan Sherman, Amy C Klopfer, Julia Desjardins, Michaël Cheng, Chi-An Senussi, Yasmeen Ratnaparkhi, Saee Mitre, Xhoi Feeley, Monica Avila Paz, Andres A Kim, Andy J Rutherford, Henry Cauley, Jessica Kim, Austin Chang, Jun Bai Park Liakos, Alexis Woolley, Ann E Walt, David Baden, Lindsey R |
author_sort | Powell, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: mRNA vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illicit strong humoral and cellular responses and have high efficacy for preventing and reducing the risk of severe illness from COVID-19. Since solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were excluded from the phase 3 trials, the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine remains unknown. Understanding the serological responses to COVID vaccines among SOT recipients is essential to better understand vaccine protection for this vulnerable population. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, a subset of SOT recipients who were part of our center’s larger antibody study were enrolled prior to receipt of two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer, Inc) vaccine for high resolution immunophenotyping. To date, plasma has been collected for 10 participants on the day of their first dose (baseline), day of their second dose, and 28 days post second dose. 23 healthy participants planning to receive either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (ModernaTX, Inc) were also enrolled, providing plasma at the same timepoints. Ultrasensitive single-molecule array (Simoa) assays were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S), S1, receptor-binding domain (RBD) and Nucleocapsid (N) IgG antibodies. RESULTS: Participant demographics and SOT recipient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Low titers of anti-N IgG at all timepoints indicate no natural infection with COVID-19 during the study (Fig 1A). There were significantly lower magnitudes for anti-S (p< 0.0001), anti-S1 (p< 0.0001), and anti-RBD (p< 0.0001) IgG titers on the day of dose 2 and day 28 post second dose for SOT recipients compared to healthy controls (Fig 1B,C,D). Using the internally validated threshold of anti-S IgG >1.07 based on pre-pandemic controls, only 50% of the SOT sub-cohort responded to vaccine after series completion (Fig 2). There was a positive trend between months from transplant and anti-S IgG titer (Fig 3). Table 1: Demographics [Image: see text] Figure 1: Anti-N, Anti-S, Anti-S1, Anti-RBD and Anti-N Ig G for healthy v. SOT cohort [Image: see text] Black error bars denote median and 95% CI. The dotted line on panel B denotes an internally validated cutoff of 1.07; anti-S IgG titers greater than 1.07 denote a positive response. Figure 3: Time from Transplant v. anti-S IgG Titer [Image: see text] SOT recipients further out from transplant tend to have a higher anti-S IgG response. The dotted line denotes an internally validated cutoff, with anti-S IgG titers greater than 1.07 indicating a positive response. CONCLUSION: SOT recipients had a significantly decreased humoral response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines compared to the healthy cohort, with those further out from transplant more likely to respond. Further research is needed to evaluate T-cell responses and clinical efficacy to maximize the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response among SOT recipients. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: Ann E. Woolley, MD, MPH, COVAX (Consultant) David Walt, PhD, Quanterix Corporation (Board Member, Shareholder) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8644376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86443762021-12-06 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Powell, Megan Sherman, Amy C Klopfer, Julia Desjardins, Michaël Cheng, Chi-An Senussi, Yasmeen Ratnaparkhi, Saee Mitre, Xhoi Feeley, Monica Avila Paz, Andres A Kim, Andy J Rutherford, Henry Cauley, Jessica Kim, Austin Chang, Jun Bai Park Liakos, Alexis Woolley, Ann E Walt, David Baden, Lindsey R Open Forum Infect Dis Oral Abstracts BACKGROUND: mRNA vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illicit strong humoral and cellular responses and have high efficacy for preventing and reducing the risk of severe illness from COVID-19. Since solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were excluded from the phase 3 trials, the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine remains unknown. Understanding the serological responses to COVID vaccines among SOT recipients is essential to better understand vaccine protection for this vulnerable population. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, a subset of SOT recipients who were part of our center’s larger antibody study were enrolled prior to receipt of two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer, Inc) vaccine for high resolution immunophenotyping. To date, plasma has been collected for 10 participants on the day of their first dose (baseline), day of their second dose, and 28 days post second dose. 23 healthy participants planning to receive either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (ModernaTX, Inc) were also enrolled, providing plasma at the same timepoints. Ultrasensitive single-molecule array (Simoa) assays were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S), S1, receptor-binding domain (RBD) and Nucleocapsid (N) IgG antibodies. RESULTS: Participant demographics and SOT recipient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Low titers of anti-N IgG at all timepoints indicate no natural infection with COVID-19 during the study (Fig 1A). There were significantly lower magnitudes for anti-S (p< 0.0001), anti-S1 (p< 0.0001), and anti-RBD (p< 0.0001) IgG titers on the day of dose 2 and day 28 post second dose for SOT recipients compared to healthy controls (Fig 1B,C,D). Using the internally validated threshold of anti-S IgG >1.07 based on pre-pandemic controls, only 50% of the SOT sub-cohort responded to vaccine after series completion (Fig 2). There was a positive trend between months from transplant and anti-S IgG titer (Fig 3). Table 1: Demographics [Image: see text] Figure 1: Anti-N, Anti-S, Anti-S1, Anti-RBD and Anti-N Ig G for healthy v. SOT cohort [Image: see text] Black error bars denote median and 95% CI. The dotted line on panel B denotes an internally validated cutoff of 1.07; anti-S IgG titers greater than 1.07 denote a positive response. Figure 3: Time from Transplant v. anti-S IgG Titer [Image: see text] SOT recipients further out from transplant tend to have a higher anti-S IgG response. The dotted line denotes an internally validated cutoff, with anti-S IgG titers greater than 1.07 indicating a positive response. CONCLUSION: SOT recipients had a significantly decreased humoral response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines compared to the healthy cohort, with those further out from transplant more likely to respond. Further research is needed to evaluate T-cell responses and clinical efficacy to maximize the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response among SOT recipients. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: Ann E. Woolley, MD, MPH, COVAX (Consultant) David Walt, PhD, Quanterix Corporation (Board Member, Shareholder) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644376/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.024 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oral Abstracts Powell, Megan Sherman, Amy C Klopfer, Julia Desjardins, Michaël Cheng, Chi-An Senussi, Yasmeen Ratnaparkhi, Saee Mitre, Xhoi Feeley, Monica Avila Paz, Andres A Kim, Andy J Rutherford, Henry Cauley, Jessica Kim, Austin Chang, Jun Bai Park Liakos, Alexis Woolley, Ann E Walt, David Baden, Lindsey R 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients |
title | 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients |
title_full | 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients |
title_fullStr | 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients |
title_full_unstemmed | 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients |
title_short | 24. Longitudinal Assessment of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients |
title_sort | 24. longitudinal assessment of immune responses to covid-19 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients |
topic | Oral Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644376/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT powellmegan 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT shermanamyc 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT klopferjulia 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT desjardinsmichael 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT chengchian 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT senussiyasmeen 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT ratnaparkhisaee 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT mitrexhoi 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT feeleymonica 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT avilapazandresa 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT kimandyj 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT rutherfordhenry 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT cauleyjessica 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT kimaustin 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT changjunbaipark 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT liakosalexis 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT woolleyanne 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT waltdavid 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients AT badenlindseyr 24longitudinalassessmentofimmuneresponsestocovid19vaccinesinsolidorgantransplantrecipients |