Cargando…

200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel

BACKGROUND: The ePlex BCID Gram-Positive (GP) panel utilizes electrowetting technology to detect the most common causes of GP bacteremia (20 targets) and 4 antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. Rapid detection of intrinsic vancomycin resistance and acquired resistance gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meeder, Jeremy, Moates, Derek, Pierce, Hannah, Hutchinson, Jamie, White, Cameron, Cumagun, Pia, Lee, Rachael A, McCarty, Todd P, Leal, Sixto M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644396/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.402
_version_ 1784610075739947008
author Meeder, Jeremy
Moates, Derek
Pierce, Hannah
Hutchinson, Jamie
White, Cameron
Cumagun, Pia
Lee, Rachael A
McCarty, Todd P
Leal, Sixto M
author_facet Meeder, Jeremy
Moates, Derek
Pierce, Hannah
Hutchinson, Jamie
White, Cameron
Cumagun, Pia
Lee, Rachael A
McCarty, Todd P
Leal, Sixto M
author_sort Meeder, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ePlex BCID Gram-Positive (GP) panel utilizes electrowetting technology to detect the most common causes of GP bacteremia (20 targets) and 4 antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. Rapid detection of intrinsic vancomycin resistance and acquired resistance genes (mecA, mecC, vanA, vanB) enables early optimization of antimicrobial therapy whereas early detection of common contaminants decreases unnecessary antibiotic utilization and hospitalizations. METHODS: In this prospective study, we evaluated the performance of the BCID-GP panel compared to traditional standard of care culture and susceptibility testing with organism identification using the BioMerieux Vitek MS Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) Time of Flight mass spectrometry. Samples submitted for standard of care testing in Biomerieux BacT/Alert resin FA/FN blood culture bottles on the BacT/Alert VIRTUO automated blood culture system with GP bacteria on direct exam (n=100) were included. RESULTS: All GP bacteria were represented on the BCID-GP panel, most tests 97/100 (97%) yielded valid results, 53 common skin contaminants (50 coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 Bacillus, 1 Corynebacterium) were identified, and 7/7 coinfections with Gram negative (GN) bacteria were detected by the Pan GN target and identified by the BCID-GN panel. Discordant analyses revealed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 96/97 (99%) with 1 false negative CNS and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 92/97 (94.8%) with 5 false positives for either S. epidermidis or Corynebacterium. Detection of vanA yielded a PPA of 4/4 and NPA of 9/9. mecA gene detection exhibited a PPA of 14/14 and NPA of 14/14 for S. aureus and a PPA of 31/32 (97%) and NPA of 16/16 for coagulase negative staphylococci with 1 false negative methicillin resistant S. epidermidis. CONCLUSION: Detection of acquired vancomycin resistance (n=4) and absence of mecA gene detection in Staphylococcus species (n=30) represent opportunities for early optimization of antimicrobial therapy in 34/100 (34%) of samples. The BCID-GP panel provides rapid accurate detection of resistant isolates and common contaminants enabling high quality data driven optimization of antimicrobial therapy. DISCLOSURES: Todd P. McCarty, MD, Cidara (Grant/Research Support)GenMark (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria for Research Presentation)T2 Biosystems (Consultant) Sixto M. Leal, Jr., MD, PhD, Abnova (Grant/Research Support)AltImmune (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Astellas Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)CNINE Dx (Grant/Research Support)GenMark Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria- Research Presentation)IHMA (Grant/Research Support)IMMY Dx (Grant/Research Support)JMI/Sentry (Grant/Research Support)mFluiDx Dx (Grant/Research Support)SpeeDx Dx (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86443962021-12-06 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel Meeder, Jeremy Moates, Derek Pierce, Hannah Hutchinson, Jamie White, Cameron Cumagun, Pia Lee, Rachael A McCarty, Todd P Leal, Sixto M Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The ePlex BCID Gram-Positive (GP) panel utilizes electrowetting technology to detect the most common causes of GP bacteremia (20 targets) and 4 antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. Rapid detection of intrinsic vancomycin resistance and acquired resistance genes (mecA, mecC, vanA, vanB) enables early optimization of antimicrobial therapy whereas early detection of common contaminants decreases unnecessary antibiotic utilization and hospitalizations. METHODS: In this prospective study, we evaluated the performance of the BCID-GP panel compared to traditional standard of care culture and susceptibility testing with organism identification using the BioMerieux Vitek MS Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) Time of Flight mass spectrometry. Samples submitted for standard of care testing in Biomerieux BacT/Alert resin FA/FN blood culture bottles on the BacT/Alert VIRTUO automated blood culture system with GP bacteria on direct exam (n=100) were included. RESULTS: All GP bacteria were represented on the BCID-GP panel, most tests 97/100 (97%) yielded valid results, 53 common skin contaminants (50 coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 Bacillus, 1 Corynebacterium) were identified, and 7/7 coinfections with Gram negative (GN) bacteria were detected by the Pan GN target and identified by the BCID-GN panel. Discordant analyses revealed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 96/97 (99%) with 1 false negative CNS and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 92/97 (94.8%) with 5 false positives for either S. epidermidis or Corynebacterium. Detection of vanA yielded a PPA of 4/4 and NPA of 9/9. mecA gene detection exhibited a PPA of 14/14 and NPA of 14/14 for S. aureus and a PPA of 31/32 (97%) and NPA of 16/16 for coagulase negative staphylococci with 1 false negative methicillin resistant S. epidermidis. CONCLUSION: Detection of acquired vancomycin resistance (n=4) and absence of mecA gene detection in Staphylococcus species (n=30) represent opportunities for early optimization of antimicrobial therapy in 34/100 (34%) of samples. The BCID-GP panel provides rapid accurate detection of resistant isolates and common contaminants enabling high quality data driven optimization of antimicrobial therapy. DISCLOSURES: Todd P. McCarty, MD, Cidara (Grant/Research Support)GenMark (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria for Research Presentation)T2 Biosystems (Consultant) Sixto M. Leal, Jr., MD, PhD, Abnova (Grant/Research Support)AltImmune (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Astellas Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)CNINE Dx (Grant/Research Support)GenMark Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria- Research Presentation)IHMA (Grant/Research Support)IMMY Dx (Grant/Research Support)JMI/Sentry (Grant/Research Support)mFluiDx Dx (Grant/Research Support)SpeeDx Dx (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644396/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.402 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Meeder, Jeremy
Moates, Derek
Pierce, Hannah
Hutchinson, Jamie
White, Cameron
Cumagun, Pia
Lee, Rachael A
McCarty, Todd P
Leal, Sixto M
200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
title 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
title_full 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
title_fullStr 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
title_full_unstemmed 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
title_short 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
title_sort 200. prospective evaluation of the genmark dx eplex(®) blood culture identification gram positive panel
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644396/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.402
work_keys_str_mv AT meederjeremy 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT moatesderek 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT piercehannah 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT hutchinsonjamie 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT whitecameron 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT cumagunpia 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT leerachaela 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT mccartytoddp 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel
AT lealsixtom 200prospectiveevaluationofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgrampositivepanel