Cargando…

874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND: HIV outpatient in-person (IN-P) visits were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, and most patients (pts) were cared for remotely through telehealth (TELE). We sought to evaluate the impact of TELE on HIV infected pts during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic IN-P care. METHODS: R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagarakanti, Sandhya, Bishburg, Eliahu, George, Donna, Ehlers, Kristen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644502/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1069
_version_ 1784610100871168000
author Nagarakanti, Sandhya
Bishburg, Eliahu
George, Donna
Ehlers, Kristen
author_facet Nagarakanti, Sandhya
Bishburg, Eliahu
George, Donna
Ehlers, Kristen
author_sort Nagarakanti, Sandhya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV outpatient in-person (IN-P) visits were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, and most patients (pts) were cared for remotely through telehealth (TELE). We sought to evaluate the impact of TELE on HIV infected pts during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic IN-P care. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pts in an outpatient HIV clinic, study period 03/30/2019 to 03/29/2021. Two periods were defined: pre-COVID (Pre-CO) 3/30/2019 to 3/29/2020 and COVID (CO) 3/30/2020 to 3/29/2021. Data was collected on demographics, HIV risk, type of encounter, number of encounters, CD4, HIV Viral loads (VL) at first, and last visit, treatment regimen information. HIV VL < 200 copies/ml was considered as undetectable. RESULTS: A total of 607 pts were evaluated. Mean age 51years; (Range-20-84). Male 306 (50.4%), African American 545(90%), Hispanic 50 (8.2%), white 9 (1.5%), Asian 3(0.5%). HIV risk: heterosexual 437(72%), male sex with male 118(19.4%), intravenous drug use 8 (1.3%). In the Pre-CO period, 530 pts were seen as IN-P; in the CO period 606 pts were encountered of which 304 (50.2%) were TELE visits, 89(14.7%) IN-P, 213(35%) had both TELE and IN-P encounters. Mean number of encounters were 2.59 in the Pre-CO and 2.46 during CO. The number of new pts in the Pre-CO were 36 (7%) vs. 52(8.6%) in the CO (p=0.26). During the pre-CO, 373 pts had CD4 measured at first and last visits, 353(95%) at the first visit and 352 (94.3%) at the last visit had CD4 counts ≥ 200/uL (p=.87); 373 pts had a VL done at first and last visits, 330 (88.5%) at the first visit and 337(90.3%) at last visit were undetectable (p=0.41). During CO, 445 pts had CD4 measured at first and last visits, 402 (90.3%) at the first visit and 445(94.2%) at the last visit had CD4 count ≥200/uL (p=0.03); 448 pts had VL measured at first and last encounters, 389(87%) at the first visit and 417(93%) in the last visit were undetectable (p=0.002). Antiretroviral changes occurred in 29% in the Pre-Co compared to 19% in the CO (p=0 .32). CONCLUSION: In our clinic, more pts were cared for during the CO period compared to the Pre-CO period. Significantly, more pts had undetectable HIV VL during CO period. At least one TELE visit was utilized by over ¾ of the pts. TELE has a potentially important role in future HIV care without compromising patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86445022021-12-06 874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Nagarakanti, Sandhya Bishburg, Eliahu George, Donna Ehlers, Kristen Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: HIV outpatient in-person (IN-P) visits were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, and most patients (pts) were cared for remotely through telehealth (TELE). We sought to evaluate the impact of TELE on HIV infected pts during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic IN-P care. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pts in an outpatient HIV clinic, study period 03/30/2019 to 03/29/2021. Two periods were defined: pre-COVID (Pre-CO) 3/30/2019 to 3/29/2020 and COVID (CO) 3/30/2020 to 3/29/2021. Data was collected on demographics, HIV risk, type of encounter, number of encounters, CD4, HIV Viral loads (VL) at first, and last visit, treatment regimen information. HIV VL < 200 copies/ml was considered as undetectable. RESULTS: A total of 607 pts were evaluated. Mean age 51years; (Range-20-84). Male 306 (50.4%), African American 545(90%), Hispanic 50 (8.2%), white 9 (1.5%), Asian 3(0.5%). HIV risk: heterosexual 437(72%), male sex with male 118(19.4%), intravenous drug use 8 (1.3%). In the Pre-CO period, 530 pts were seen as IN-P; in the CO period 606 pts were encountered of which 304 (50.2%) were TELE visits, 89(14.7%) IN-P, 213(35%) had both TELE and IN-P encounters. Mean number of encounters were 2.59 in the Pre-CO and 2.46 during CO. The number of new pts in the Pre-CO were 36 (7%) vs. 52(8.6%) in the CO (p=0.26). During the pre-CO, 373 pts had CD4 measured at first and last visits, 353(95%) at the first visit and 352 (94.3%) at the last visit had CD4 counts ≥ 200/uL (p=.87); 373 pts had a VL done at first and last visits, 330 (88.5%) at the first visit and 337(90.3%) at last visit were undetectable (p=0.41). During CO, 445 pts had CD4 measured at first and last visits, 402 (90.3%) at the first visit and 445(94.2%) at the last visit had CD4 count ≥200/uL (p=0.03); 448 pts had VL measured at first and last encounters, 389(87%) at the first visit and 417(93%) in the last visit were undetectable (p=0.002). Antiretroviral changes occurred in 29% in the Pre-Co compared to 19% in the CO (p=0 .32). CONCLUSION: In our clinic, more pts were cared for during the CO period compared to the Pre-CO period. Significantly, more pts had undetectable HIV VL during CO period. At least one TELE visit was utilized by over ¾ of the pts. TELE has a potentially important role in future HIV care without compromising patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644502/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1069 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Nagarakanti, Sandhya
Bishburg, Eliahu
George, Donna
Ehlers, Kristen
874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic
title 874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full 874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr 874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed 874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short 874. Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic Impact of Telehealth in HIV Ambulatory Clinic during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort 874. impact of telehealth in hiv ambulatory clinic during covid-19 pandemic impact of telehealth in hiv ambulatory clinic during covid-19 pandemic
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644502/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1069
work_keys_str_mv AT nagarakantisandhya 874impactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemicimpactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemic
AT bishburgeliahu 874impactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemicimpactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemic
AT georgedonna 874impactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemicimpactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemic
AT ehlerskristen 874impactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemicimpactoftelehealthinhivambulatoryclinicduringcovid19pandemic