Cargando…

30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital

BACKGROUND: The consequences of SARS-CoV2 reinfections for patients, healthcare workers and society are unclear. We reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological characteristics of patients re-infected with genetically distinct strains of SARS-CoV2 identified by Whole Virus Genome Sequencin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutton, Una, Lynch, Judi, Fitzgerald, Niamh, Macori, Guerrino, Fanning, Séamus, Fennell, Jérôme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644504/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.030
_version_ 1784610101349318656
author Sutton, Una
Lynch, Judi
Fitzgerald, Niamh
Macori, Guerrino
Fanning, Séamus
Fennell, Jérôme
author_facet Sutton, Una
Lynch, Judi
Fitzgerald, Niamh
Macori, Guerrino
Fanning, Séamus
Fennell, Jérôme
author_sort Sutton, Una
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The consequences of SARS-CoV2 reinfections for patients, healthcare workers and society are unclear. We reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological characteristics of patients re-infected with genetically distinct strains of SARS-CoV2 identified by Whole Virus Genome Sequencing (WvGS). METHODS: Cases were selected based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test, clinical resolution, a negative interim test and a subsequent positive nasopharyngeal swab. Positive samples were prepared for sequencing by cDNA synthesis, tiled-PCR following the ARTIC protocol and amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq platform. Raw reads were mapped to the reference sequence using bowtie and Samtools was used for variants calling and to generate the consensus sequences. Comparative sequence analysis was conducted by phylogenetic inference maximum likelihood method with RAxML using the multiple sequence aligned by MAFFT. Clades and variants were assigned respectively using Nextstrain and Pangolin COVID-19 lineage assigner (Figure 1). The clinical, radiological and laboratory data were collected from patient medical notes and laboratory information system. RESULTS: Two cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection were detected by RT-PCR (patient 1 and 2). C(T) values and strain variants are presented in Table 1. The time between detection of the first and second infection was 67 and 270 days respectively. WvGS confirmed that the second episodes were due to a genetically distinct strain of SARS CoV2. These reflected the dominant contemporaneous variants in circulation. Both patients were immunocompromised from co-morbidities and medications. First and subsequent infections were minimally symptomatic. Both cases were associated with known hospital outbreaks. They passed away within 2 weeks of the second infection of unrelated causes. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Two patients in this study were diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection confirmed by WvGS. A common factor in these cases was immunocompromise. Where a previously infected patient test shows a new positive or an unexpected reduction in C(T) value is observed, we recommend individual risk assessment to determine the timing of discontinuation of isolation and infection control precautions. DISCLOSURES: Jérôme Fennell, MB BCh BAO MSc PhD FRCPath FRCPI, Roche Diagnostics (Advisor or Review Panel member)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86445042021-12-06 30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital Sutton, Una Lynch, Judi Fitzgerald, Niamh Macori, Guerrino Fanning, Séamus Fennell, Jérôme Open Forum Infect Dis Oral Abstracts BACKGROUND: The consequences of SARS-CoV2 reinfections for patients, healthcare workers and society are unclear. We reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological characteristics of patients re-infected with genetically distinct strains of SARS-CoV2 identified by Whole Virus Genome Sequencing (WvGS). METHODS: Cases were selected based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test, clinical resolution, a negative interim test and a subsequent positive nasopharyngeal swab. Positive samples were prepared for sequencing by cDNA synthesis, tiled-PCR following the ARTIC protocol and amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq platform. Raw reads were mapped to the reference sequence using bowtie and Samtools was used for variants calling and to generate the consensus sequences. Comparative sequence analysis was conducted by phylogenetic inference maximum likelihood method with RAxML using the multiple sequence aligned by MAFFT. Clades and variants were assigned respectively using Nextstrain and Pangolin COVID-19 lineage assigner (Figure 1). The clinical, radiological and laboratory data were collected from patient medical notes and laboratory information system. RESULTS: Two cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection were detected by RT-PCR (patient 1 and 2). C(T) values and strain variants are presented in Table 1. The time between detection of the first and second infection was 67 and 270 days respectively. WvGS confirmed that the second episodes were due to a genetically distinct strain of SARS CoV2. These reflected the dominant contemporaneous variants in circulation. Both patients were immunocompromised from co-morbidities and medications. First and subsequent infections were minimally symptomatic. Both cases were associated with known hospital outbreaks. They passed away within 2 weeks of the second infection of unrelated causes. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Two patients in this study were diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection confirmed by WvGS. A common factor in these cases was immunocompromise. Where a previously infected patient test shows a new positive or an unexpected reduction in C(T) value is observed, we recommend individual risk assessment to determine the timing of discontinuation of isolation and infection control precautions. DISCLOSURES: Jérôme Fennell, MB BCh BAO MSc PhD FRCPath FRCPI, Roche Diagnostics (Advisor or Review Panel member) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644504/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.030 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Abstracts
Sutton, Una
Lynch, Judi
Fitzgerald, Niamh
Macori, Guerrino
Fanning, Séamus
Fennell, Jérôme
30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital
title 30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital
title_full 30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr 30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital
title_short 30. SARS-CoV2 Reinfections in a University Teaching Hospital
title_sort 30. sars-cov2 reinfections in a university teaching hospital
topic Oral Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644504/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.030
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonuna 30sarscov2reinfectionsinauniversityteachinghospital
AT lynchjudi 30sarscov2reinfectionsinauniversityteachinghospital
AT fitzgeraldniamh 30sarscov2reinfectionsinauniversityteachinghospital
AT macoriguerrino 30sarscov2reinfectionsinauniversityteachinghospital
AT fanningseamus 30sarscov2reinfectionsinauniversityteachinghospital
AT fennelljerome 30sarscov2reinfectionsinauniversityteachinghospital