Cargando…
40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
BACKGROUND: Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) within long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) is challenging due to limited resources and missing patient data from transferring facilities. In October 2018, an ASP was established within a 43-hopital system consisting of LTACs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644508/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.242 |
_version_ | 1784610102339174400 |
---|---|
author | Shea, Katherine M Wayne, Segars Stocker, Jamie Velez, Meredith Davis, Elizabeth Snider, Darrell |
author_facet | Shea, Katherine M Wayne, Segars Stocker, Jamie Velez, Meredith Davis, Elizabeth Snider, Darrell |
author_sort | Shea, Katherine M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) within long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) is challenging due to limited resources and missing patient data from transferring facilities. In October 2018, an ASP was established within a 43-hopital system consisting of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals. Despite the presence of a restricted antimicrobial policy, increased utilization was observed for five restricted antimicrobials. The system ASP committee implemented a multipronged approach to optimize utilization of these five agents. Investigators sought to assess the impact of an antimicrobial intake process on antimicrobial consumption. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis within a 43-hospital system of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals, comparing use of five restricted antibiotics before (Jul19-Jun20) and after (Jul20-Apr21) implementation of a data-collection and system review process. An antibiotic intake form and process for review for five restricted antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, fidaxomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam) was approved at the system ASP committee. The intake form consisted of a restricted antibiotic form, cultures and susceptibilities, physician notes, and other pertinent data. Any orders for the five antibiotics required completion of an intake form and submission to system ASP members for review and recommendations. Antibiotic consumption was measured in cost per acute patient day (cost/pd) using a 2-sided t-test. RESULTS: Post-implementation, the five restricted antibiotics comprised 29.1% of the total antibiotic expenditure for the healthcare system compared to 35.6% pre-implementation. Ten months after program implementation, the total antibiotic cost/PD decreased 29.45% [(&12.02 ± 2.29) vs. (&8.48 ± 1.45); p=0.0003]. The cost/PD of the five restricted antibiotics decreased 42.52% [(&4.28 ± 1.09) vs. (&2.46 ± 0.99) ; p=0.0005]. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an antimicrobial intake process within a post-acute medical system resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic consumption for five targeted antibiotics as well as overall antibiotic expenditure. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8644508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86445082021-12-06 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System Shea, Katherine M Wayne, Segars Stocker, Jamie Velez, Meredith Davis, Elizabeth Snider, Darrell Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) within long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) is challenging due to limited resources and missing patient data from transferring facilities. In October 2018, an ASP was established within a 43-hopital system consisting of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals. Despite the presence of a restricted antimicrobial policy, increased utilization was observed for five restricted antimicrobials. The system ASP committee implemented a multipronged approach to optimize utilization of these five agents. Investigators sought to assess the impact of an antimicrobial intake process on antimicrobial consumption. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis within a 43-hospital system of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals, comparing use of five restricted antibiotics before (Jul19-Jun20) and after (Jul20-Apr21) implementation of a data-collection and system review process. An antibiotic intake form and process for review for five restricted antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, fidaxomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam) was approved at the system ASP committee. The intake form consisted of a restricted antibiotic form, cultures and susceptibilities, physician notes, and other pertinent data. Any orders for the five antibiotics required completion of an intake form and submission to system ASP members for review and recommendations. Antibiotic consumption was measured in cost per acute patient day (cost/pd) using a 2-sided t-test. RESULTS: Post-implementation, the five restricted antibiotics comprised 29.1% of the total antibiotic expenditure for the healthcare system compared to 35.6% pre-implementation. Ten months after program implementation, the total antibiotic cost/PD decreased 29.45% [(&12.02 ± 2.29) vs. (&8.48 ± 1.45); p=0.0003]. The cost/PD of the five restricted antibiotics decreased 42.52% [(&4.28 ± 1.09) vs. (&2.46 ± 0.99) ; p=0.0005]. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an antimicrobial intake process within a post-acute medical system resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic consumption for five targeted antibiotics as well as overall antibiotic expenditure. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644508/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.242 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Shea, Katherine M Wayne, Segars Stocker, Jamie Velez, Meredith Davis, Elizabeth Snider, Darrell 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System |
title | 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System |
title_full | 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System |
title_fullStr | 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System |
title_full_unstemmed | 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System |
title_short | 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System |
title_sort | 40. impact of an antimicrobial intake process within a post-acute medical system |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644508/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheakatherinem 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem AT waynesegars 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem AT stockerjamie 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem AT velezmeredith 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem AT daviselizabeth 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem AT sniderdarrell 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem |