Cargando…

40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System

BACKGROUND: Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) within long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) is challenging due to limited resources and missing patient data from transferring facilities. In October 2018, an ASP was established within a 43-hopital system consisting of LTACs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shea, Katherine M, Wayne, Segars, Stocker, Jamie, Velez, Meredith, Davis, Elizabeth, Snider, Darrell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644508/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.242
_version_ 1784610102339174400
author Shea, Katherine M
Wayne, Segars
Stocker, Jamie
Velez, Meredith
Davis, Elizabeth
Snider, Darrell
author_facet Shea, Katherine M
Wayne, Segars
Stocker, Jamie
Velez, Meredith
Davis, Elizabeth
Snider, Darrell
author_sort Shea, Katherine M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) within long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) is challenging due to limited resources and missing patient data from transferring facilities. In October 2018, an ASP was established within a 43-hopital system consisting of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals. Despite the presence of a restricted antimicrobial policy, increased utilization was observed for five restricted antimicrobials. The system ASP committee implemented a multipronged approach to optimize utilization of these five agents. Investigators sought to assess the impact of an antimicrobial intake process on antimicrobial consumption. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis within a 43-hospital system of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals, comparing use of five restricted antibiotics before (Jul19-Jun20) and after (Jul20-Apr21) implementation of a data-collection and system review process. An antibiotic intake form and process for review for five restricted antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, fidaxomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam) was approved at the system ASP committee. The intake form consisted of a restricted antibiotic form, cultures and susceptibilities, physician notes, and other pertinent data. Any orders for the five antibiotics required completion of an intake form and submission to system ASP members for review and recommendations. Antibiotic consumption was measured in cost per acute patient day (cost/pd) using a 2-sided t-test. RESULTS: Post-implementation, the five restricted antibiotics comprised 29.1% of the total antibiotic expenditure for the healthcare system compared to 35.6% pre-implementation. Ten months after program implementation, the total antibiotic cost/PD decreased 29.45% [(&12.02 ± 2.29) vs. (&8.48 ± 1.45); p=0.0003]. The cost/PD of the five restricted antibiotics decreased 42.52% [(&4.28 ± 1.09) vs. (&2.46 ± 0.99) ; p=0.0005]. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an antimicrobial intake process within a post-acute medical system resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic consumption for five targeted antibiotics as well as overall antibiotic expenditure. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86445082021-12-06 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System Shea, Katherine M Wayne, Segars Stocker, Jamie Velez, Meredith Davis, Elizabeth Snider, Darrell Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) within long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) is challenging due to limited resources and missing patient data from transferring facilities. In October 2018, an ASP was established within a 43-hopital system consisting of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals. Despite the presence of a restricted antimicrobial policy, increased utilization was observed for five restricted antimicrobials. The system ASP committee implemented a multipronged approach to optimize utilization of these five agents. Investigators sought to assess the impact of an antimicrobial intake process on antimicrobial consumption. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis within a 43-hospital system of LTACs and rehabilitation hospitals, comparing use of five restricted antibiotics before (Jul19-Jun20) and after (Jul20-Apr21) implementation of a data-collection and system review process. An antibiotic intake form and process for review for five restricted antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, fidaxomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam) was approved at the system ASP committee. The intake form consisted of a restricted antibiotic form, cultures and susceptibilities, physician notes, and other pertinent data. Any orders for the five antibiotics required completion of an intake form and submission to system ASP members for review and recommendations. Antibiotic consumption was measured in cost per acute patient day (cost/pd) using a 2-sided t-test. RESULTS: Post-implementation, the five restricted antibiotics comprised 29.1% of the total antibiotic expenditure for the healthcare system compared to 35.6% pre-implementation. Ten months after program implementation, the total antibiotic cost/PD decreased 29.45% [(&12.02 ± 2.29) vs. (&8.48 ± 1.45); p=0.0003]. The cost/PD of the five restricted antibiotics decreased 42.52% [(&4.28 ± 1.09) vs. (&2.46 ± 0.99) ; p=0.0005]. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an antimicrobial intake process within a post-acute medical system resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic consumption for five targeted antibiotics as well as overall antibiotic expenditure. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644508/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.242 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Shea, Katherine M
Wayne, Segars
Stocker, Jamie
Velez, Meredith
Davis, Elizabeth
Snider, Darrell
40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
title 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
title_full 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
title_fullStr 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
title_full_unstemmed 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
title_short 40. Impact of an Antimicrobial Intake Process within a Post-acute Medical System
title_sort 40. impact of an antimicrobial intake process within a post-acute medical system
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644508/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.242
work_keys_str_mv AT sheakatherinem 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem
AT waynesegars 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem
AT stockerjamie 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem
AT velezmeredith 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem
AT daviselizabeth 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem
AT sniderdarrell 40impactofanantimicrobialintakeprocesswithinapostacutemedicalsystem